GodHatesAllOfUs wrote:

---

I feel we were robbed of not seeing Alex's reaction to being voted back in...sorry, having a chance to be voted back in...after spending weeks with that squeaky cocktease Amanda.

Alex America loves you, but our lame twist doesn't.

I feel... ]]> feeds@yuku.com (GodHatesAllOfUs) http://survivorsucks.com/sreply/2640700 Thu, 13 Mar 2008 23:13:13 GMT http://survivorsucks.com/reply/2640499/t/Worst-twist-in-history.html#reply-2640499
Couples. They were in there for a few days, created alliances and then it was all shot to hell when they all got matched up with other people. Loved that. The game immediately changed for everyone and we on the feeds were the recipients of the drama that ensued. Thanks BB.

Going to singles. SA knows better than anyone that twist was my fave because Allison still left. Regardless, it totally changed up their games... ]]> feeds@yuku.com (tdugan333) http://survivorsucks.com/sreply/2640499 Thu, 13 Mar 2008 22:41:57 GMT http://survivorsucks.com/reply/2638139/t/Worst-twist-in-history.html#reply-2638139 GodHatesAllOfUs wrote:

I feel we were robbed of not seeing Alex's reaction to being voted back in...sorry, having a chance to be voted back in...after spending weeks with that squeaky cocktease Amanda.

Alex America loves you, but our lame twist doesn't.

I feel robbed, too. I can't believe they didn't even show him again after the vote-in took place.... ]]> feeds@yuku.com (Piperett) http://survivorsucks.com/sreply/2638139 Thu, 13 Mar 2008 17:32:18 GMT http://survivorsucks.com/reply/2638047/t/Worst-twist-in-history.html#reply-2638047 GrenadeJumper85 wrote:

he didn't deserve to go out like that and now I'm glad he hasn't...

On the contrary, I think the twist of having them be couples worked great. Although certainly the two other twists to go along with that at the start, the secret couple and the ex couple completely blew up on them and never should have been tried in the first place.

denise4925 wrote:

---

StarRider wrote:

---

Face it, the original couples twist ruined the show from the start, but allowing anybody back after being evicted is just plain unfair from a strategic point of view. It's great for a viewer fan, but really fucks up the players... ]]> feeds@yuku.com (denise4925) http://survivorsucks.com/sreply/2637780 Thu, 13 Mar 2008 15:54:57 GMT http://survivorsucks.com/reply/2637769/t/Worst-twist-in-history.html#reply-2637769 he didn't deserve to go out like that and now I'm glad he hasn't...

Uuuuh, he deserved to get EVICTED just as much as the five people that got evicted before him did, even more so
for him. He and Josh were just so confident they had this past week wrapped up, and couldn't see the writing on the wall if it came up and fucked them in the ass. (No pun intended, really) ]]> feeds@yuku.com (GrenadeJumper85) http://survivorsucks.com/sreply/2637769 Thu, 13 Mar 2008 15:53:08 GMT http://survivorsucks.com/reply/2637749/t/Worst-twist-in-history.html#reply-2637749 denise4925 wrote:

---

StarRider wrote:

---

Face it, the original couples twist ruined the show from the start, but allowing anybody back after being evicted is just plain unfair from a strategic point of view. It's great for a viewer fan, but really fucks up the players who played their hands in the boot. It's just stupid to do period.

I totally... ]]> feeds@yuku.com (willsucks402) http://survivorsucks.com/sreply/2637749 Thu, 13 Mar 2008 15:48:54 GMT http://survivorsucks.com/reply/2637727/t/Worst-twist-in-history.html#reply-2637727 ]]> feeds@yuku.com (chad6) http://survivorsucks.com/sreply/2637727 Thu, 13 Mar 2008 15:42:12 GMT http://survivorsucks.com/reply/2637677/t/Worst-twist-in-history.html#reply-2637677 StarRider wrote:

---

Face it, the original couples twist ruined the show from the start, but allowing anybody back after being evicted is just plain unfair from a strategic point of view. It's great for a viewer fan, but really fucks up the players who played their hands in the boot. It's just stupid to do period.

I so completely agree. No matter who it is, I think it is wrong to give someone another chance... ]]> feeds@yuku.com (SimplyKimberly) http://survivorsucks.com/sreply/2637464 Thu, 13 Mar 2008 14:47:28 GMT http://survivorsucks.com/reply/2637455/t/Worst-twist-in-history.html#reply-2637455 I think the twist was somewhat different, which made it interesting, but stupid nonetheless. It makes no sense to keep all those people sequestered for nothing. I hear rumors of the writer's strike coming up again so i just think CBS is doing what they can to make the season longer, if need be. They could always cut two or three at a time if they have to end it earlier than suspected. It seems the producers are playing it by ear with what the writer's are going to do. Either... ]]> feeds@yuku.com (Kelegyrl) http://survivorsucks.com/sreply/2637455 Thu, 13 Mar 2008 14:45:58 GMT http://survivorsucks.com/reply/2637380/t/Worst-twist-in-history.html#reply-2637380
you all should just laugh, too. it's not going to change so long as allison grodner runs this
]]> feeds@yuku.com (gokkun) http://survivorsucks.com/sreply/2637380 Thu, 13 Mar 2008 14:30:09 GMT http://survivorsucks.com/reply/2637356/t/Worst-twist-in-history.html#reply-2637356 feeds@yuku.com (StarRider) http://survivorsucks.com/sreply/2637356 Thu, 13 Mar 2008 14:25:42 GMT http://survivorsucks.com/reply/2637348/t/Worst-twist-in-history.html#reply-2637348 roxbury123 wrote: