Re: Alexis????? Someone please explain...

feeds@yuku.com (Loony Moonie) — Wed, 07 May 2008 08:20:50 GMT

Your logic was astonishing, AllMenAreIslands! At first glance, I thought it was a bad move, but after reading your post... yeah, Parvati is smarter than I thought.

Re: Alexis????? Someone please explain...

feeds@yuku.com (yosimtesam) — Tue, 06 May 2008 20:29:31 GMT

it may appear that the logic is impeccable; but i ask you this; if you pour a glass exactly half ful... is it half full or half empty... is it.... is it.... im just saying...

Re: Alexis????? Someone please explain...

feeds@yuku.com (WatchMeNext) — Mon, 05 May 2008 22:14:57 GMT

ok, I concede

Re: Alexis????? Someone please explain...

feeds@yuku.com (AllMenAreIslands) — Sun, 04 May 2008 14:01:05 GMT

WatchMeNext wrote:
It was dumb. Vote out the challenge threat Natalie, five are left. UNLESS Alexis won immunity, which she wouldn't because of her leg, then vote her out next. This way - either Erik or Natalie are in line to win immunities.

Miss Beauty Pageant, who theoretically has mastered the art of answering questions on the fly and speaking in public, still flubbed her final TC performance. Just because...

Re: Alexis????? Someone please explain...

feeds@yuku.com (AllMenAreIslands) — Sun, 04 May 2008 13:48:50 GMT

WatchMeNext wrote:
Seriously? Parvati who everyone says she mistakenly believes she's in control of the game? I laugh.

Yes, they all did say that. And yet editing went to the effort of showing us later how Parvati GOT HER WAY when it came to whom to boot, Alexis or Natalie. Remember, Amanda wanted to target Natalie probably in a bid to reduce the number of solid allies Parvati would have left in the...

Re: Alexis????? Someone please explain...

feeds@yuku.com (survivorisdabest) — Sun, 04 May 2008 03:32:51 GMT

Exactly, natalie can beat erik in immunity for them. Now its a position where one of the two immunity threats is going to lose ANYWAY, so they'll just vote them out.

Re: Alexis????? Someone please explain...

feeds@yuku.com (sunflower100) — Sun, 04 May 2008 00:05:22 GMT

Another good point about them still need to take out Erik. They might have also wanted to keep Natalie around to increase their odds, that someone can beat Erik in the next immunity challenge.

Re: Alexis????? Someone please explain...

feeds@yuku.com (Kirblar) — Sat, 03 May 2008 23:57:03 GMT

Keep in mind that they NEED Erik to lose immunity. They can't beat him.

Re: Alexis????? Someone please explain...

feeds@yuku.com (sunflower100) — Sat, 03 May 2008 23:48:55 GMT

noigres wrote:

WatchMeNext wrote:
why voting out the non-threatening-challenge gimp Alexis was smarter than voting out the cat lady? Someone?

Amanda wasted her immunity idol over a jealous twinge, sending her rival STRAIGHT into the arms of her boyfriend. Yeah, that was brilliant.

Re: Alexis????? Someone please explain...

feeds@yuku.com (kishuu) — Sat, 03 May 2008 23:36:08 GMT
face it or not, Alexis would be the jury threat after Amanda. Amanda's just getting rid of her competitor in terms of jury votes. Amanda can openly say she did something, without having to go to great pains explaining it, and unless whoever's in the final three can convince the jury of giving them the votes, Amanda is probably the shoe-in to win this round. Hello? Erik was revealed to be a two-faced bitch to the jury and if he went to the jury he would be like...

Jury:...

Re: Alexis????? Someone please explain...

feeds@yuku.com (Sole Survivor Genius) — Sat, 03 May 2008 20:49:17 GMT
Well look what happened when they never voted Amber off.

Sorry I compared that slut/man to Amber!

Re: Alexis????? Someone please explain...

feeds@yuku.com (emjoi) — Sat, 03 May 2008 18:53:34 GMT
Alexis would have been like Amanda in China at the Final Tribal Council.
She's look like an obvious win, having offended no one, but then the Jury would ask her "And what did you actually do?".
And then she'd get perhaps 2 votes from Erik and Natalie.

Re: Alexis????? Someone please explain...

feeds@yuku.com (sunnfllower) — Sat, 03 May 2008 14:53:11 GMT
Watch Me Next hit the target. Alexis was gimpy legged & in enuf pain to be worthless at challenges. Cirie already worthless at challenges. Amanda let her emotions get in the way & wanted Alexis voted out cause she flirted with Ozzy. But all she did was send Alexis to Ponderosa where she'll have a week or so left to play with Ozzy & get to know him.

She should have left her in the game, she was no threat & not very well liked & certainly has shown no...

Re: Alexis????? Someone please explain...

feeds@yuku.com (Syoma) — Sat, 03 May 2008 05:17:45 GMT

WatchMeNext wrote:
It was dumb. Vote out the challenge threat Natalie, five are left. UNLESS Alexis won immunity, which she wouldn't because of her leg, then vote her out next. This way - either Erik or Natalie are in line to win immunities.

Miss Beauty Pageant, who theoretically has mastered the art of answering questions on the fly and speaking in public, still flubbed her final TC performance. Just because...

Re: Alexis????? Someone please explain...

feeds@yuku.com (mrnoluvstill) — Fri, 02 May 2008 21:46:41 GMT
Well obviously was thinking that Cire who was honest to her and told her she was going to vote for her can be trusted, Parv can be trusted, so it was either sexy girl or plain jane Alexis, thank GOD she got rid of plain jane.

Re: Alexis????? Someone please explain...

feeds@yuku.com (yellowfang) — Fri, 02 May 2008 20:53:32 GMT
She's kind of a motivational speaker for a living.

Re: Alexis????? Someone please explain...

feeds@yuku.com (XXWildcat) — Fri, 02 May 2008 18:07:45 GMT

WatchMeNext wrote:
all of them also said that Alexis never shuts up, so I don't necessarily believe she's the jury darling that you're all making her out to be

Parv was the correct answer to that question, two people did pick Alexis, and one of them was Parv of course.

Re: Alexis????? Someone please explain...

feeds@yuku.com (WatchMeNext) — Fri, 02 May 2008 16:21:34 GMT
all of them also said that Alexis never shuts up, so I don't necessarily believe she's the jury darling that you're all making her out to be

Re: Alexis????? Someone please explain...

feeds@yuku.com (AmightyRo) — Fri, 02 May 2008 15:25:18 GMT

WatchMeNext wrote:
It was dumb. Vote out the challenge threat Natalie, five are left. UNLESS Alexis won immunity, which she wouldn't because of her leg, then vote her out next. This way - either Erik or Natalie are in line to win immunities.

Miss Beauty Pageant, who theoretically has mastered the art of answering questions on the fly and speaking in public, still flubbed her final TC performance. Just because...

Re: Alexis????? Someone please explain...

feeds@yuku.com (Boo Radley 2001) — Fri, 02 May 2008 13:56:14 GMT
BuffytheThreadSlaryer wrote:

Parvati no longer needs Natalie to be 100 per cent loyal as long as Cirie votes with her and Amanda.

The way Cirie was acting, it seemed to me she was ready to drop Amanda and Parvati and join up with the fnas. It would have been a good move for her, but I'm glad it didn't happen.

br

edited to fix quote and spacing.

Alexis????? Someone please explain...

feeds@yuku.com (WatchMeNext) — Thu, 01 May 2008 21:24:03 GMT
why voting out the non-threatening-challenge gimp Alexis was smarter than voting out the cat lady? Someone?

Amanda wasted her immunity idol over a jealous twinge, sending her rival STRAIGHT into the arms of her boyfriend. Yeah, that was brilliant.