<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" href="/feed/bypass/styles/feed.css" media="screen"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="/feed/bypass/styles/feed.xsl"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/">

	<channel>
	  <!-- main channel info -->
        <title>Ep 1/2 Editing/Winner Analysis.  (NOT edgic-based.) </title>
        <link>http://survivorsucks.com/topic/39194/t/Ep-1-2-Editing-Winner-Analysis-NOT-edgic-based-.html</link>
        <description>
        <![CDATA[ Prefacing this- This is pretty much pure spec- going by editing, Probst&#39;s comments, and a tiny, tiny hint from a MySpace page.  Also, Edgic is a good
concept (Tapewatcher&#39;s editing analyses were amazing.) taken to a ridiculous, stupid extreme.  Edgic takes art and tries to turn it into science.  And in
the process misses what&#39;s patently obvious to everyone else (Steph loses, duh.)  It&#39;s about the story the editors are trying to tell.  Not the
arbitrary ratings that are... ]]>
        </description>

		<!-- optional elements -->
		<language>en-us</language>
		<copyright>Copyright 2006, Yuku</copyright>
		<managingEditor>feeds@yuku.com (FeedMaster)</managingEditor>
		<webMaster>webmaster@yuku.com (WebMaster)</webMaster>
		<!-- note: dates need to be RFC 822 formated "Sat, 07 Sep 2002 00:00:01 GMT" -->
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 12:51:18 GMT</pubDate>
		<lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2008 15:29:46 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>Yuku Feeds 1.0</generator>
		<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
		<!-- <cloud domain="rpc.yuku.com" port="80" path="/RPC2" registerProcedure="pingMe" protocol="soap"/>-->
		<ttl>60</ttl>
		<!-- feed image -->
		
		<rating>
		{pics-1.1 &quot;http://www.icra.org/ratingsv02.html&quot; l gen true for &quot;http://yuku.com&quot; r (nz 1 vz 1 lz 1 oz 1 cz 1 ) &quot;http://www.rsac.org/ratingsv01.html&quot; l gen true for &quot;http://yuku.com&quot; r (n 0 s 0 v 0 l 0 ))
		</rating>
		<textInput>
			<title>Search</title>
			<description>Search Domain</description>
			<name>q</name>
			<link>http://yuku.com/search/direct/</link>
		</textInput>
		<!-- skip
		<skipHours>
			<hour>23</hour>
		</skipHours>
		<skipDays>
			<day>Monday</day>
			<day>Wednesday</day>
			<day>Friday</day>
		</skipDays>-->
		<!-- extensions -->


		<!-- channel items -->
		<!-- descriptions should be shorter than 500 char to be polite -->
		<!-- html shoud be stripped or escaped -->
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Ep 1/2 Editing/Winner Analysis.  (NOT edgic-based.)  ]]></title>
			<link>http://survivorsucks.com/reply/3698811/t/Ep-1-2-Editing-Winner-Analysis-NOT-edgic-based-.html#reply-3698811</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ I am just speculating based on Randy/Matty&#39;s/Sugar&#39;s edit. Matty has been shown at odds with Crystal/Ken on. Sugar has had a big edit and has been
shown to not be too happy with Ken. It&#39;s possible that Matty/Sugar realize they need to take out a couple of the onion alliance members, before they make
their move against Kenny/Crystal. If they are smart that is what they will do, or it just might be Randy that figures out after Marcus is voted out that is
what he needs to do to have... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (sunflower101)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://survivorsucks.com/sreply/3698811</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2008 15:29:46 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Ep 1/2 Editing/Winner Analysis.  (NOT edgic-based.)  ]]></title>
			<link>http://survivorsucks.com/reply/3683293/t/Ep-1-2-Editing-Winner-Analysis-NOT-edgic-based-.html#reply-3683293</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Nah, Bob&#39;s next.  I&#39;l bet nunuKota throw the challenge to axe Bob, and then Charlie is the first merge casualty. (assuming merge at 8)
<br> ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (cyclehausen)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://survivorsucks.com/sreply/3683293</guid>
			<pubDate>Sun, 09 Nov 2008 17:24:35 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Ep 1/2 Editing/Winner Analysis.  (NOT edgic-based.)  ]]></title>
			<link>http://survivorsucks.com/reply/3683161/t/Ep-1-2-Editing-Winner-Analysis-NOT-edgic-based-.html#reply-3683161</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ <blockquote>
  <strong class="quote-title">cindidindi76 wrote:</strong>
  <hr>

  <blockquote>
    Matt has three big problems
    <br>
    <br>
    1. He&#39;s the last alpha male standing, thanks to the loses of Dan/Ace/Marcus he&#39;s the last young athletic male which means he will be a target, he
    might have to run the table
  </blockquote>
  <br>
  <br>
  Charlie is also a young athletic male. I know he&#39;s not your typical alpha male, since he&#39;s gay, but it&#39;s not like... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Nods)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://survivorsucks.com/sreply/3683161</guid>
			<pubDate>Sun, 09 Nov 2008 16:26:36 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Ep 1/2 Editing/Winner Analysis.  (NOT edgic-based.)  ]]></title>
			<link>http://survivorsucks.com/reply/3683076/t/Ep-1-2-Editing-Winner-Analysis-NOT-edgic-based-.html#reply-3683076</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ and Bob has been simply astounding in challenges.... better in fact than many of the younger people.
<br>
<br>
Matty has something that the other players don&#39;t really have... his story is directly tied to the theme of the show...Earth&#39;s Last Eden. He introduced
us to that theme in the 1st 5 minutes of the show.... and he has been consistently shown to relate the game play to the Eden theme. Survivor loves the
themes... they regularly tied Earl to the Have/Have Not theme, Todd was tied... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Phoenix1269)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://survivorsucks.com/sreply/3683076</guid>
			<pubDate>Sun, 09 Nov 2008 15:44:37 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Ep 1/2 Editing/Winner Analysis.  (NOT edgic-based.)  ]]></title>
			<link>http://survivorsucks.com/reply/3682844/t/Ep-1-2-Editing-Winner-Analysis-NOT-edgic-based-.html#reply-3682844</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ <blockquote>
  Matt has three big problems
  <br>
  <br>
  1. He&#39;s the last alpha male standing, thanks to the loses of Dan/Ace/Marcus he&#39;s the last young athletic male which means he will be a target, he
  might have to run the table
</blockquote>
<br>
<br>
Charlie is also a young athletic male. I know he&#39;s not your typical alpha male, since he&#39;s gay, but it&#39;s not like it&#39;s Matty and a bunch of old
ladies. ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (cindidindi76)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://survivorsucks.com/sreply/3682844</guid>
			<pubDate>Sun, 09 Nov 2008 14:10:40 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Ep 1/2 Editing/Winner Analysis.  (NOT edgic-based.)  ]]></title>
			<link>http://survivorsucks.com/reply/3681226/t/Ep-1-2-Editing-Winner-Analysis-NOT-edgic-based-.html#reply-3681226</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ I believe Randy wins too.
<br> ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (IluvGoddessCirie)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://survivorsucks.com/sreply/3681226</guid>
			<pubDate>Sun, 09 Nov 2008 04:54:39 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Ep 1/2 Editing/Winner Analysis.  (NOT edgic-based.)  ]]></title>
			<link>http://survivorsucks.com/reply/3680387/t/Ep-1-2-Editing-Winner-Analysis-NOT-edgic-based-.html#reply-3680387</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Matt has three big problems
<br>
<br>
1. He&#39;s the last alpha male standing, thanks to the loses of Dan/Ace/Marcus he&#39;s the last young athletic male which means he will be a target, he might
have to run the table
<br>
<br>
2. He will go into the final three as a challenge hog, if Ozzy couldn&#39;t win then he has no chance rarely does a player who wins multiple challenges win the
final prize, in 80% of the cases that person loses, 100% in the 3 juror era.
<br>
<br>
3. He was under the... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Nods)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://survivorsucks.com/sreply/3680387</guid>
			<pubDate>Sat, 08 Nov 2008 21:28:53 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Ep 1/2 Editing/Winner Analysis.  (NOT edgic-based.)  ]]></title>
			<link>http://survivorsucks.com/reply/3680040/t/Ep-1-2-Editing-Winner-Analysis-NOT-edgic-based-.html#reply-3680040</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Matty is also a winner pick.  If you ascribe to the theory that the winner has a confessional interspered during Probst&#39;s opening narrative which ends with
&quot;18 people, 39 days, 1 Survivor!&quot;, then Matty is the only one of the 6 contestants who gave those confessionals that can win.  GC, Ace and Marcus
have been voted out.  Crystal has too negative an edit to win and Bob has no game.  Matty has been naive but with Ace, Dan and Marcus eliminated, Matty can
make it to the final 3 by... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (tullfan2)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://survivorsucks.com/sreply/3680040</guid>
			<pubDate>Sat, 08 Nov 2008 19:35:50 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Ep 1/2 Editing/Winner Analysis.  (NOT edgic-based.)  ]]></title>
			<link>http://survivorsucks.com/reply/3679889/t/Ep-1-2-Editing-Winner-Analysis-NOT-edgic-based-.html#reply-3679889</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ I think we have one of three winners
<br>
<br>
Randy - Has been the protypical player this season, thats not to say he wins or loses Cirie, Yau-Man, James, Jonathon, Terry all had the same amount of face
time.  My guess is that Randy is the &quot;star&quot; of the show who makes it to the final five or final three.  But with all of that said Randy has been
portrayed and played the game like a snake.  He has made it clear that he will allign with or eliminate anyone so that he can survive.... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Nods)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://survivorsucks.com/sreply/3679889</guid>
			<pubDate>Sat, 08 Nov 2008 18:53:44 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Ep 1/2 Editing/Winner Analysis.  (NOT edgic-based.)  ]]></title>
			<link>http://survivorsucks.com/reply/3679213/t/Ep-1-2-Editing-Winner-Analysis-NOT-edgic-based-.html#reply-3679213</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ <p align="left">I had some thoughts this morning.  Namely, we&#39;ve all been assuming that the main biblical metaphor going this season is the Adam/Eve kicked
out of the garden story.  And this storyline has been central to game, particularly with the actions on Fang and the Ace boot.  This metaphor revolves around
Sugar (Eve), Kenny (the Snake), Matty (Adam), and Ace (God).  This story has generally been played out with Ace&#39;s boot.
<br>
<br>
Yet underneath this metaphor has lied a... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Tyran Amiros)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://survivorsucks.com/sreply/3679213</guid>
			<pubDate>Sat, 08 Nov 2008 15:27:13 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Ep 1/2 Editing/Winner Analysis.  (NOT edgic-based.)  ]]></title>
			<link>http://survivorsucks.com/reply/3675996/t/Ep-1-2-Editing-Winner-Analysis-NOT-edgic-based-.html#reply-3675996</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ <blockquote>
  - At the same time, everyone this season seems as scared of the HII as they were in Cook Islands for some reason. Everyone mentions flushing it out, but
  nobody does. Sugar will prance her way to the F4 with the idol in her back pocket at this rate.
</blockquote>I don&#39;t think it&#39;s that.  Matty knew he was on the outs of GC/Ken/Crystal and so he latched onto Ace/Sugar.  When GC quit, it gave him the
opening to essentially &quot;force&quot; Kelly out because had... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Kirblar)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://survivorsucks.com/sreply/3675996</guid>
			<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 13:49:07 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Ep 1/2 Editing/Winner Analysis.  (NOT edgic-based.)  ]]></title>
			<link>http://survivorsucks.com/reply/3675969/t/Ep-1-2-Editing-Winner-Analysis-NOT-edgic-based-.html#reply-3675969</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Can we make this the official random speculation thread?  Um...as long as we agree that Randy is important?  Done!
<br>
<br>
- Susie is P.I.Sandra but with loose lips.  She is playing a less successful social game and I think she will make F3 by whoring her vote every time.
<br>
<br>
- Don&#39;t make too much of the Sugar/Matty alliance, methinks.  Sugar is being edited as &quot;last person to talk to her gets her trust.&quot;  She is too
flippant, and people who rely on her will fall hard.... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (cyclehausen)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://survivorsucks.com/sreply/3675969</guid>
			<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 13:43:04 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Ep 1/2 Editing/Winner Analysis.  (NOT edgic-based.)  ]]></title>
			<link>http://survivorsucks.com/reply/3671860/t/Ep-1-2-Editing-Winner-Analysis-NOT-edgic-based-.html#reply-3671860</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Like this thread :)  Hope it continues.  I might give my thoughts later. ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (XSurVivoR1FaNx)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://survivorsucks.com/sreply/3671860</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 18:46:49 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Ep 1/2 Editing/Winner Analysis.  (NOT edgic-based.)  ]]></title>
			<link>http://survivorsucks.com/reply/3669612/t/Ep-1-2-Editing-Winner-Analysis-NOT-edgic-based-.html#reply-3669612</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ One other thing I&#39;m now considering.  It&#39;s possible Randy may be telling us how the winner wins.
<br> ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Kirblar)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://survivorsucks.com/sreply/3669612</guid>
			<pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 23:42:51 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Ep 1/2 Editing/Winner Analysis.  (NOT edgic-based.)  ]]></title>
			<link>http://survivorsucks.com/reply/3657065/t/Ep-1-2-Editing-Winner-Analysis-NOT-edgic-based-.html#reply-3657065</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ 6 Fang members are in the first half of the credits, along with Bob, Corrine, and Kelly.  6 Kota members are in the second half, alongside Michelle, Gillian,
and Randy.
<br> ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Kirblar)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://survivorsucks.com/sreply/3657065</guid>
			<pubDate>Sun, 02 Nov 2008 22:36:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Ep 1/2 Editing/Winner Analysis.  (NOT edgic-based.)  ]]></title>
			<link>http://survivorsucks.com/reply/3656658/t/Ep-1-2-Editing-Winner-Analysis-NOT-edgic-based-.html#reply-3656658</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ <blockquote>
  <strong class="quote-title">Kirblar wrote:</strong>
  <hr>
  Credits- There are 3 people from Fang out of order in the intro. Gillian, Michelle, and Randy. Two of them were voted out. One was not. 
  <br>
  <br>
  <strong>hmm I want to know what you mean by this.</strong>
  <br>
  <br>
    
</blockquote> ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (TheEasyOne)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://survivorsucks.com/sreply/3656658</guid>
			<pubDate>Sun, 02 Nov 2008 21:28:54 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Ep 1/2 Editing/Winner Analysis.  (NOT edgic-based.)  ]]></title>
			<link>http://survivorsucks.com/reply/3655298/t/Ep-1-2-Editing-Winner-Analysis-NOT-edgic-based-.html#reply-3655298</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ <blockquote>
  It&#39;s about the story the editors are trying to tell. Not the arbitrary ratings that are assigned to them.
</blockquote>&lt;3 this thread.
<br>
<br>
ok, so the editors have been wet for the whole genesis theme ever since james&#39;s soundapplebite/present to them in china and understandably so. it&#39;s a
nice twist on the whole morality/ethics of playing survivor that they&#39;ve been working with since season 1. it allows them to ramp up the symbolism and
subtexty shit... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (even number)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://survivorsucks.com/sreply/3655298</guid>
			<pubDate>Sun, 02 Nov 2008 15:31:40 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Ep 1/2 Editing/Winner Analysis.  (NOT edgic-based.)  ]]></title>
			<link>http://survivorsucks.com/reply/3654031/t/Ep-1-2-Editing-Winner-Analysis-NOT-edgic-based-.html#reply-3654031</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Interesting post Kirblar! Thanks.
<br> ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (spyzsrvvrcharmd)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://survivorsucks.com/sreply/3654031</guid>
			<pubDate>Sun, 02 Nov 2008 03:57:15 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Ep 1/2 Editing/Winner Analysis.  (NOT edgic-based.)  ]]></title>
			<link>http://survivorsucks.com/reply/3651579/t/Ep-1-2-Editing-Winner-Analysis-NOT-edgic-based-.html#reply-3651579</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ <p>Randy as the second place finisher is also possible, if he&#39;s getting the Steph treatment.  (I don&#39;t think he is, though.)</p> ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Kirblar)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://survivorsucks.com/sreply/3651579</guid>
			<pubDate>Sat, 01 Nov 2008 14:08:33 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Ep 1/2 Editing/Winner Analysis.  (NOT edgic-based.)  ]]></title>
			<link>http://survivorsucks.com/reply/3651373/t/Ep-1-2-Editing-Winner-Analysis-NOT-edgic-based-.html#reply-3651373</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Yeah I don&#39;t know if they&#39;ve ever dedicated an entire preview to the winner being in charge.
<br> ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (FranklinBluth)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://survivorsucks.com/sreply/3651373</guid>
			<pubDate>Sat, 01 Nov 2008 12:34:46 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Ep 1/2 Editing/Winner Analysis.  (NOT edgic-based.)  ]]></title>
			<link>http://survivorsucks.com/topic/39194/t/Ep-1-2-Editing-Winner-Analysis-NOT-edgic-based-.html</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Prefacing this- This is pretty much pure spec- going by editing, Probst&#39;s comments, and a tiny, tiny hint from a MySpace page.  Also, Edgic is a good
concept (Tapewatcher&#39;s editing analyses were amazing.) taken to a ridiculous, stupid extreme.  Edgic takes art and tries to turn it into science.  And in
the process misses what&#39;s patently obvious to everyone else (Steph loses, duh.)  It&#39;s about the story the editors are trying to tell.  Not the
arbitrary ratings that are... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Kirblar)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://survivorsucks.com/topic/39194</guid>
			<pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 12:51:18 GMT</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
    <!-- end items -->

  </channel>
</rss>