hi i have spoilers too!!! http://survivorsucks.com/topic/58494/t/hi-i-have-spoilers-too-.html en-us Copyright 2006, Yuku feeds@yuku.com (FeedMaster) webmaster@yuku.com (WebMaster) Fri, 02 Oct 2009 23:28:56 GMT Thu, 10 Dec 2009 04:42:15 GMT Yuku Feeds 1.0 http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss 60 Yuku http://static.yuku.com//feed/bypass/images/button-yuku.png http://survivorsucks.com/topic/58494/t/hi-i-have-spoilers-too-.html Yuku - free hosted forums and profiles 88 31 {pics-1.1 "http://www.icra.org/ratingsv02.html" l gen true for "http://yuku.com" r (nz 1 vz 1 lz 1 oz 1 cz 1 ) "http://www.rsac.org/ratingsv01.html" l gen true for "http://yuku.com" r (n 0 s 0 v 0 l 0 )) Search Search Domain q http://yuku.com/search/direct/ <![CDATA[ Re: hi i have spoilers too!!! ]]> http://survivorsucks.com/reply/5410066/t/hi-i-have-spoilers-too-.html#reply-5410066 Stryme wrote:
Is anyone else strangely looking forward to the Ponderosa vids of Coach and Courtney?
Yeah, I was thinking about that the other day.

I wish we got to see footage from the pre-jury loser lodge too. Randy getting reunited with sugar <3

]]> feeds@yuku.com (tomash) http://survivorsucks.com/sreply/5410066 Thu, 10 Dec 2009 04:42:15 GMT <![CDATA[ Re: hi i have spoilers too!!! ]]> http://survivorsucks.com/reply/5410056/t/hi-i-have-spoilers-too-.html#reply-5410056 ]]> feeds@yuku.com (Stryme) http://survivorsucks.com/sreply/5410056 Thu, 10 Dec 2009 04:34:57 GMT <![CDATA[ Re: hi i have spoilers too!!! ]]> http://survivorsucks.com/reply/5409938/t/hi-i-have-spoilers-too-.html#reply-5409938 chapera rocks wrote:
I think you can quantify it in certain cases.

Fairplay doesn't quit (which is an unlikely scenario, let's be real) and Parvati is voted out that night. There were 6 votes against her. They had lost the immunity challenge.

No outcast twist. 5 vs. 5. Shawn is unhappy. Tijuana is unhappy. Sandra is the least threatening of the Drakes. That is not a direct detriment to... ]]> feeds@yuku.com (Katy Carney) http://survivorsucks.com/sreply/5409938 Thu, 10 Dec 2009 02:10:16 GMT <![CDATA[ Re: hi i have spoilers too!!! ]]> http://survivorsucks.com/reply/5409836/t/hi-i-have-spoilers-too-.html#reply-5409836 Katy Carney wrote:
Not at all. I've never denied Parvati or any other winner was lucky. I just resist quantifying it. "oh Winner X was more lucky than Winner Y because I know exactly what would have happened if Scenario A had occurred instead of Scenario B..." and "DIRECT impact" and all that (sounds so ridiculous to me considering it gave her side an immediate advantage and eventually led to that woman... ]]> feeds@yuku.com (chapera rocks) http://survivorsucks.com/sreply/5409836 Thu, 10 Dec 2009 00:41:12 GMT <![CDATA[ Re: hi i have spoilers too!!! ]]> http://survivorsucks.com/reply/5409786/t/hi-i-have-spoilers-too-.html#reply-5409786 feeds@yuku.com (Ahora) http://survivorsucks.com/sreply/5409786 Thu, 10 Dec 2009 00:09:06 GMT <![CDATA[ Re: hi i have spoilers too!!! ]]> http://survivorsucks.com/reply/5409768/t/hi-i-have-spoilers-too-.html#reply-5409768 feeds@yuku.com (Katy Carney) http://survivorsucks.com/sreply/5409768 Wed, 09 Dec 2009 23:54:46 GMT <![CDATA[ Re: hi i have spoilers too!!! ]]> http://survivorsucks.com/reply/5409736/t/hi-i-have-spoilers-too-.html#reply-5409736 ]]> feeds@yuku.com (chapera rocks) http://survivorsucks.com/sreply/5409736 Wed, 09 Dec 2009 23:40:59 GMT <![CDATA[ Re: hi i have spoilers too!!! ]]> http://survivorsucks.com/reply/5409730/t/hi-i-have-spoilers-too-.html#reply-5409730 hated Sandra and JFP at first. lol I'm going to stop now. This is speculation and could go any which way considering it's imaginary and maybe Sandra would have won regardless, idk. But postmerge PI was HUGELY impacted by the Outcast twist and Sandra's alliance immediately profited from it. That's undeniable. I mean, objectively, it happened. In real life. She, like all winners, benefitted from a lot of things not... ]]> feeds@yuku.com (Katy Carney) http://survivorsucks.com/sreply/5409730 Wed, 09 Dec 2009 23:38:27 GMT <![CDATA[ Re: hi i have spoilers too!!! ]]> http://survivorsucks.com/reply/5409690/t/hi-i-have-spoilers-too-.html#reply-5409690 ]]> feeds@yuku.com (chapera rocks) http://survivorsucks.com/sreply/5409690 Wed, 09 Dec 2009 23:23:29 GMT <![CDATA[ Re: hi i have spoilers too!!! ]]> http://survivorsucks.com/reply/5409662/t/hi-i-have-spoilers-too-.html#reply-5409662 chapera rocks wrote:
The outcast didn't directly benefit Sandra. It benefited Fairplay the most out of anyone besides Lill/Burton, obviously.


I disagree. Without Lill the Morgans would have gone in a very solid 5 against a very fractured Drake. JFP and Shawn were on the outs and either would have flipped on the others in a heartbeat. Even if they didn't they would have had to face a tie. It was... ]]> feeds@yuku.com (Katy Carney) http://survivorsucks.com/sreply/5409662 Wed, 09 Dec 2009 23:16:42 GMT <![CDATA[ Re: hi i have spoilers too!!! ]]> http://survivorsucks.com/reply/5409628/t/hi-i-have-spoilers-too-.html#reply-5409628 ]]> feeds@yuku.com (chapera rocks) http://survivorsucks.com/sreply/5409628 Wed, 09 Dec 2009 23:01:48 GMT <![CDATA[ Re: hi i have spoilers too!!! ]]> http://survivorsucks.com/reply/5409610/t/hi-i-have-spoilers-too-.html#reply-5409610 LKMOSCAR wrote:

Although I disagree with the notion that Sandra isn't much of a player, I also know what she DOES DO in season 20 and can guarantee people that weren't amazed with her the first time around that they'll be very impressed. She'll make just as good of a winner, and probably better, as Parvati would have.:)



I just hope she's still "her". Idgaf about... ]]> feeds@yuku.com (Katy Carney) http://survivorsucks.com/sreply/5409610 Wed, 09 Dec 2009 22:54:09 GMT <![CDATA[ Re: hi i have spoilers too!!! ]]> http://survivorsucks.com/reply/5409602/t/hi-i-have-spoilers-too-.html#reply-5409602
Im not gunna make a newbi-ish new thread so i'll just ask here; what do you think the new ancient voices will be like? ASS 1 it made sense to do a 'megamix', if you will, of all previous themes because there was a castaway from each season...now we only have season 2, 4, 7, (8), 10, (11), 12, 13, 15, (16), 17, 18, 19...so you think they will do a whole new song or a mix of ALL previous themes... ]]> feeds@yuku.com (JerseyJerk) http://survivorsucks.com/sreply/5409602 Wed, 09 Dec 2009 22:51:41 GMT <![CDATA[ Re: hi i have spoilers too!!! ]]> http://survivorsucks.com/reply/5409568/t/hi-i-have-spoilers-too-.html#reply-5409568 Although I disagree with the notion that Sandra isn't much of a player, I also know what she DOES DO in season 20 and can guarantee people that weren't amazed with her the first time around that they'll be very impressed. She'll make just as good of a winner, and probably better, as Parvati would have.:)

]]> feeds@yuku.com (LKMOSCAR) http://survivorsucks.com/sreply/5409568 Wed, 09 Dec 2009 22:39:53 GMT <![CDATA[ Re: hi i have spoilers too!!! ]]> http://survivorsucks.com/reply/5409555/t/hi-i-have-spoilers-too-.html#reply-5409555
Yeah, Sandra engineered Trish's outster. Trish was breaking up the majority alliance for no reason. Rupert was an honest, loyal player. Why the fuck should Sandra vote him out? SHE saved him, lol at spinning it to her just being his sidekick.

Tijuana was saying... ]]> feeds@yuku.com (chapera rocks) http://survivorsucks.com/sreply/5409555 Wed, 09 Dec 2009 22:38:31 GMT <![CDATA[ Re: hi i have spoilers too!!! ]]> http://survivorsucks.com/reply/5409468/t/hi-i-have-spoilers-too-.html#reply-5409468 chapera rocks wrote:
Sandra got into a majority alliance that outnumbered Burton/Shawn/Michelle.

Sandra engineered Trish's outster, which put her in a great position at Drake.

Sandra flipped Tijuana, and took her out when she got power hungry.

Sandra tried to convince the girls to take out the boys, but they were too under their spell, which was their stupidity not hers.
... ]]> feeds@yuku.com (Katy Carney) http://survivorsucks.com/sreply/5409468 Wed, 09 Dec 2009 22:17:19 GMT <![CDATA[ Re: hi i have spoilers too!!! ]]> http://survivorsucks.com/reply/5409277/t/hi-i-have-spoilers-too-.html#reply-5409277
Sandra engineered Trish's outster, which put her in a great position at Drake.

Sandra flipped Tijuana, and took her out when she got power hungry.

Sandra tried to convince the girls to take out the boys, but they were too under their spell, which was their stupidity not hers.

Sandra was aware of how Fairplay was playing the game and used it to her advantage; she could... ]]> feeds@yuku.com (chapera rocks) http://survivorsucks.com/sreply/5409277 Wed, 09 Dec 2009 21:37:22 GMT <![CDATA[ Re: hi i have spoilers too!!! ]]> http://survivorsucks.com/reply/5409245/t/hi-i-have-spoilers-too-.html#reply-5409245
Burton's boot is the only one throughout the game that can really be attributed to Sandra. It was a good move amid four or five stupid, petty and personal ones... ]]> feeds@yuku.com (Katy Carney) http://survivorsucks.com/sreply/5409245 Wed, 09 Dec 2009 21:31:35 GMT <![CDATA[ Re: hi i have spoilers too!!! ]]> http://survivorsucks.com/reply/5409136/t/hi-i-have-spoilers-too-.html#reply-5409136 Oowatanite wrote:
Mypoody2 wrote:
...you're an amber fan.
So ? What's your point ?


Amber played an almost perfect game in ASS. She was part of the controlling tribe and alliance the whole game. She had an excellent social game. She was good in challenges but was not a threat. She threw challenges to Rob to... ]]> feeds@yuku.com (roxbury123) http://survivorsucks.com/sreply/5409136 Wed, 09 Dec 2009 21:06:21 GMT <![CDATA[ Re: hi i have spoilers too!!! ]]> http://survivorsucks.com/reply/5408900/t/hi-i-have-spoilers-too-.html#reply-5408900
She was the one constantly trying to rally the troops and it took forever for Darrah and Lill to see it.

She also would have won against anyone in the final 6, maybe 7. Darrah may have won but I doubt it, Burton and Jon respected Sandra's game the most out of the three women (which doesn't say much since they didn't respect any of the... ]]> feeds@yuku.com (chapera rocks) http://survivorsucks.com/sreply/5408900 Wed, 09 Dec 2009 20:10:32 GMT <![CDATA[ hi i have spoilers too!!! ]]> http://survivorsucks.com/topic/58494/t/hi-i-have-spoilers-too-.html
I been away for a bit.

Jenna Morasca was indeed out there on location, interviewing (thats all) all the Villains & Heroes...btw, it's VILLAINS vs Heroes, not the other way around.

On Natilie Bolton, she was there and eventually cut on location.

Who said Boston Rob is on Heroes? Nah, he's a Viallain.

This "LA Alliance" does NOT exist.

Danielle DiLorenzo is really, actually out there. I just... ]]> feeds@yuku.com (SurvivorsUnite) http://survivorsucks.com/topic/58494 Fri, 02 Oct 2009 23:28:56 GMT