<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/">

	<channel>
	  <!-- main channel info -->
        <title>The Sophie G. Clarke Edit </title>
        <link>http://survivorsucks.com/topic/92817/The-Sophie-G-Clarke-Edit</link>
        <description>
        <![CDATA[ Kim is getting the Sophie G. Clarke edit.&nbsp; Is anybody else realizing this beautiful symmetry with last year's season?&nbsp; Sophie was never portrayed in a negative light when it came to her strategy.&nbsp; Every edit displayed a calm, confident woman who always had a broader perspective of where the game would take her (although, as I discuss later, was hid from the viewer).&nbsp; This is exactly how Kim has been portrayed.&nbsp; Her quote "time will tell" within the first episode made... ]]>
        </description>

		<!-- optional elements -->
		<language>en-us</language>
		<copyright>Copyright 2011, Yuku</copyright>
		<managingEditor>feeds@yuku.com (FeedMaster)</managingEditor>
		<webMaster>webmaster@yuku.com (WebMaster)</webMaster>
		<!-- note: dates need to be RFC 822 formated "Sat, 07 Sep 2002 00:00:01 GMT" -->
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2012 22:00:10 GMT</pubDate>
		<lastBuildDate>Sun, 11 Mar 2012 05:15:30 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>Kickapps Feeds 1.0</generator>
		<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
		<ttl>60</ttl>

		<rating>
		{pics-1.1 &quot;http://www.icra.org/ratingsv02.html&quot; l gen true for &quot;http://yuku.com&quot; r (nz 1 vz 1 lz 1 oz 1 cz 1 ) &quot;http://www.rsac.org/ratingsv01.html&quot; l gen true for &quot;http://yuku.com&quot; r (n 0 s 0 v 0 l 0 ))
		</rating>
		<textInput>
			<title>Search</title>
			<description>Search Domain</description>
			<name>q</name>
			<link>http://yuku.com/search/direct/</link>
		</textInput>
		<!-- skip
		<skipHours>
			<hour>23</hour>
		</skipHours>
		<skipDays>
			<day>Monday</day>
			<day>Wednesday</day>
			<day>Friday</day>
		</skipDays>-->
		<!-- extensions -->


		<!-- channel items -->
		<!-- descriptions should be shorter than 500 char to be polite -->
		<!-- html shoud be stripped or escaped -->
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: The Sophie G. Clarke Edit  ]]></title>
			<link>http://survivorsucks.com/reply/8173516/The-Sophie-G-Clarke-Edit#reply-8173516</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Bendis....I could care less whether people like Sophie or not.&nbsp; I probably would have voted for Coach that season if I was on the jury.&nbsp; He played the best game but he fucking sucked at the end because he had no balls and couldn't just say "I pl...<br /><a href="http://survivorsucks.com/reply/8173516/The-Sophie-G-Clarke-Edit#reply-8173516">Read More</a> ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (RussellsHiddenIdol)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://survivorsucks.com/reply/8173516</guid>
			<pubDate>Sun, 11 Mar 2012 05:15:30 PST</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: The Sophie G. Clarke Edit  ]]></title>
			<link>http://survivorsucks.com/reply/8170891/The-Sophie-G-Clarke-Edit#reply-8170891</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ RussellsHiddenIdol wrote:LooneyTunes, you are spot on about the Danni edit!&nbsp; I am confused though why our theories about the editing cannot both make sense.&nbsp; In my analysis, there is room for your argument.&nbsp; I agree about the whole overall ...<br /><a href="http://survivorsucks.com/reply/8170891/The-Sophie-G-Clarke-Edit#reply-8170891">Read More</a> ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Bendis)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://survivorsucks.com/reply/8170891</guid>
			<pubDate>Sat, 10 Mar 2012 01:49:46 PST</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: The Sophie G. Clarke Edit  ]]></title>
			<link>http://survivorsucks.com/reply/8170706/The-Sophie-G-Clarke-Edit#reply-8170706</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Jedijake thanks for the post :) ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (RussellsHiddenIdol)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://survivorsucks.com/reply/8170706</guid>
			<pubDate>Sat, 10 Mar 2012 00:21:46 PST</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: The Sophie G. Clarke Edit  ]]></title>
			<link>http://survivorsucks.com/reply/8170646/The-Sophie-G-Clarke-Edit#reply-8170646</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ It's a good comparison for a typical female winner edit (not that we've had a whole of female winners anyway).However, Kim is a souped up version. She's already had more at this point than both Danni and Sophie combined (I think). Every confessional is im...<br /><a href="http://survivorsucks.com/reply/8170646/The-Sophie-G-Clarke-Edit#reply-8170646">Read More</a> ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Jedijake)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://survivorsucks.com/reply/8170646</guid>
			<pubDate>Sat, 10 Mar 2012 00:00:18 PST</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: The Sophie G. Clarke Edit  ]]></title>
			<link>http://survivorsucks.com/reply/8170523/The-Sophie-G-Clarke-Edit#reply-8170523</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Kim is not like Danni at all neither is Sophie.
We saw absolutely no strategy talk from Danni pre-F6.
She was so WTF winner. She seemed like she won just because no one liked Steph.
I don't know many things she done well for her game. Except the social...<br /><a href="http://survivorsucks.com/reply/8170523/The-Sophie-G-Clarke-Edit#reply-8170523">Read More</a> ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (Cfc)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://survivorsucks.com/reply/8170523</guid>
			<pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2012 23:19:04 PST</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: The Sophie G. Clarke Edit  ]]></title>
			<link>http://survivorsucks.com/reply/8170445/The-Sophie-G-Clarke-Edit#reply-8170445</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ It will be interesting if they both end up on the same tribe next week if this tribal switch really happens. ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (RussellsHiddenIdol)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://survivorsucks.com/reply/8170445</guid>
			<pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2012 22:56:04 PST</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: The Sophie G. Clarke Edit  ]]></title>
			<link>http://survivorsucks.com/reply/8170429/The-Sophie-G-Clarke-Edit#reply-8170429</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Danni, Sophie, and Kim are all quiet gamers who  keep there strategic game in focus and make moves in the end when it really counts. Notice how most of the cast expect for Kim and Jay seem to be distractions of some sort. ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (LooneyTunes)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://survivorsucks.com/reply/8170429</guid>
			<pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2012 22:51:36 PST</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: The Sophie G. Clarke Edit  ]]></title>
			<link>http://survivorsucks.com/reply/8170398/The-Sophie-G-Clarke-Edit#reply-8170398</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ This still does not erase the fact that her edit is similar in that both were edited immediately in the first episode with having a degree of adaptability that proves to be helpful in their game. ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (RussellsHiddenIdol)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://survivorsucks.com/reply/8170398</guid>
			<pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2012 22:43:12 PST</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: The Sophie G. Clarke Edit  ]]></title>
			<link>http://survivorsucks.com/reply/8170376/The-Sophie-G-Clarke-Edit#reply-8170376</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ LooneyTunes, you are spot on about the Danni edit!&nbsp; I am confused though why our theories about the editing cannot both make sense.&nbsp; In my analysis, there is room for your argument.&nbsp; I agree about the whole overall story arc being about Coa...<br /><a href="http://survivorsucks.com/reply/8170376/The-Sophie-G-Clarke-Edit#reply-8170376">Read More</a> ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (RussellsHiddenIdol)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://survivorsucks.com/reply/8170376</guid>
			<pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2012 22:37:00 PST</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: The Sophie G. Clarke Edit  ]]></title>
			<link>http://survivorsucks.com/reply/8170357/The-Sophie-G-Clarke-Edit#reply-8170357</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Sophie got the edit she got because she was in an alliance filled with distractions and the other tribe had Ozzy and Cochran too. This season is much more evenly edited so you can't really compare the two just yet. ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (juicyfruit)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://survivorsucks.com/reply/8170357</guid>
			<pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2012 22:29:21 PST</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: The Sophie G. Clarke Edit  ]]></title>
			<link>http://survivorsucks.com/reply/8170352/The-Sophie-G-Clarke-Edit#reply-8170352</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ You know, I was hoping I wasn't going to end my comment with something hasty like that.You are right, I went off on a tangent at the end.&nbsp; You are referring to the rankings she does with Gordon Holmes right?&nbsp; From listening to her talk about the...<br /><a href="http://survivorsucks.com/reply/8170352/The-Sophie-G-Clarke-Edit#reply-8170352">Read More</a> ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (RussellsHiddenIdol)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://survivorsucks.com/reply/8170352</guid>
			<pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2012 22:26:01 PST</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: The Sophie G. Clarke Edit  ]]></title>
			<link>http://survivorsucks.com/reply/8170347/The-Sophie-G-Clarke-Edit#reply-8170347</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Sophie was giving the edit she got because out of the final 3 with Coach and Albert,  She was more tolerable.  Sophie played a good strategic game and her edit was subdued a bit due to Ozzy-Brandon-Coach screen time.  Her season was heavily male dominated...<br /><a href="http://survivorsucks.com/reply/8170347/The-Sophie-G-Clarke-Edit#reply-8170347">Read More</a> ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (LooneyTunes)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://survivorsucks.com/reply/8170347</guid>
			<pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2012 22:25:13 PST</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: The Sophie G. Clarke Edit  ]]></title>
			<link>http://survivorsucks.com/reply/8170320/The-Sophie-G-Clarke-Edit#reply-8170320</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Where has Sophie supported Kim? I've only seen her power rankings. ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (evans992)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://survivorsucks.com/reply/8170320</guid>
			<pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2012 22:16:14 PST</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ The Sophie G. Clarke Edit  ]]></title>
			<link>http://survivorsucks.com/topic/92817/The-Sophie-G-Clarke-Edit</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Kim is getting the Sophie G. Clarke edit.&nbsp; Is anybody else realizing this beautiful symmetry with last year's season?&nbsp; Sophie was never portrayed in a negative light when it came to her strategy.&nbsp; Every edit displayed a calm, confident woma...<br /><a href="http://survivorsucks.com/topic/92817/The-Sophie-G-Clarke-Edit">Read More</a> ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@yuku.com (RussellsHiddenIdol)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://survivorsucks.com/topic/92817</guid>
			<pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2012 22:00:10 PST</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
    <!-- end items -->

  </channel>
</rss>
