
| Started By | Comment | ||
|---|---|---|---|
Yeaster |
|||
|
Cirie deserves it the most, I think. Amanda, like, JUST playing. If she won...I don't know, I would be totally indifferent. I just don't find her
interesting at all. Same goes for Erik. I'd root for Parvati or Natalie before those two.
|
|||
mtj1282 |
|||
|
Posts: 1079 (05/03/08 07:26 AM) |
what i really want to know is if alexis or nat used amanda getting to the final three last time as reason to want to get rid of her. everyone out there knows
she already made it to the end last season so i dont know why they wouldnt feel threatened by that?!?!
|
||
Ozzmanda Fan234 |
|||
1. Will you feel it's deserved?? Yes!!! Amanda is a great player and she would definetly deserve it.
|
|||
hippo2002 |
|||
|
If Amanda wins,then Micronesia is the best season ever!
|
|||
angstygoldfish |
|||
|
How could this even be a valid question now?
|
|||
dayzdnconfuzd |
|||
riskysurv wrote: I agree, erik does not deserve to win. He's a follower. I got sick of his "i'm not worthy!" schtick with ozzy long ago.
|
|||
hippo2002 |
|||
|
Amanda did want to vote out Natalie,but Parvaty wanted to voted out Alexis because she thought Alexis was a threat in F3
|
|||
kennethp21 |
|||
hippo2002 wrote: hence, amanda < parv
|
|||
Relynn |
|||
DGVision1 wrote: There are different ways of playing the game. One could argue that it is a risk not to make millions of alliances with millions of people. But that risk
pays off when you get to the jury. Survivor is all about deciding what risks/to take what risks not to take. Still Amanda does take risks in the game, she
took out James last Season..But she also insisted that they take out James at 7 when the fans numbers had dwindled. I suspect that Amanda might have wanted to
take out Ozzy/James, but she probably wanted to wait until a few more fans were gone. If the fans hadn' been so completely stupid, they could have taken
control of the game. In challenges, Ozzy was clearly not as strong as he was in Cook Islands.
Why we already knew from editing that Amanda didn't want to face Alexis in the Final 3. |
|||
riverheightsnancy |
|||
|
I only want Cirie to win, with Parvati 2nd. Cirie has been outspoken about most of the boots ALL season long, unlike Amanda. Amanda was too busy making little
Ozzlettes to give a shit about the game. Amanda thought they she could coast to a final 4 with her showmance alliance. For myself, finally giving a shit and
playing the odds by playing the HII at final 5, is a little too little too late. I liked Amanda during China and really thought that she was the mastermind of
Todd, but her implosion killed it for me. I cannot stand her bottom lip out with the big sad look and doe eyes. If she wins I will be LIVID. Furthermore, the
lividAmanda thread needs her to lose so that it can continue on in livid glory.
|
|||
platinumtlc |
|||
|
Amanda JUST started playing, AKA NELEH. Cirie and Parvati have been playing since the very beginning. THe way I see it, Amanda is no different than Catalie in
terms of when they actually started playing the game.
|
|||
Relynn |
|||
platinumtlc wrote: What are you talking about.. We saw Amanda on the boat with Cirie/Pavarti discussing their Final 3 alliance in Episode what was it FOUR. In fact, they
panned to Amanda I believe when Cirie talked about how people should be offering her stuff.
|
|||
platinumtlc |
|||
|
I don't think making a deal to be F3 is 'playing the game'. I think playing the game is making power plays and strategic votes and being IN power.
|
|||
Relynn |
|||
platinumtlc wrote: Whatever..There are different ways to play the game. Todd/Amanda in China wanted Aaron to think that he was the leader of the tribe (Todd even agreed to
boot off Leslie with this aim) They wanted to do this so that some of the heat would be taken off them, and when the time was right they planned to backstabb
Aaron, before he oculd reach the Final 3. There are different ways to play this game. And sometimes smart players know there are times to follow, as well as
times to lead. (If Parvarti/Cirie wanted to do Amanda's dirty work for her by getting rid of Ozzy, well good for them) Smart players though, know when to
follow and when also to take the lead. Plus, since Parvarti/Cirie did Amanda's dirty work by getting rid of Ozzy, it's not so stupid know for Amanda
to just continue not making promises and continue to make sure she gets to the end. If she can convince Cirie/Parvarti to keep her around, inspite of the fact
that she's pissed off a lot less jury members, that's Cirie/Parvarti's mistake.
|
|||
Bobby Jon goes apeshit |
|||
|
Meh...anyone but Erik.
|
|||
platinumtlc |
|||
|
Meh... anyone but Manhanda.
|
|||
ProbstFan123 |
|||
|
^ Agreed.
|
|||
AnomyBC |
|||
|
Will you feel it's deserved?
I think Amanda would be a deserving winner, but Parvati and Cirie would be more deserving. Will you still consider this to be a great season? Yes. Will it make this season worth it? This season is already "worth it". It has been since "It's just a stick!" Will it be the perfect story book ending? No. Will you be pissed? I might be a little bit LIVID that Parvati or Cirie didn't win, but I love Amanda too (and Catalie as well.) Will it make the season just mediocre? No. It would still be an awesome season. |
|||
LaurenTheLush |
|||
|
Will you feel it's deserved?
Not really. While I loved the wonderful acting job she did with the HII, it doesn't make up for her coattailing the previous 30 days. Will you still consider this to be a great season? Most definitely, I loved this season. Will it make this season worth it? This season was amazing regardless of who wins. Will it be the perfect story book ending? Negative. Will you be pissed? No, Amanda isn't undeserving, I just don't think she is the most deserving. Will it make the season just mediocre? No. It would still be an awesome season. |
|||
Relynn |
|||
|
See my thinking is kind of this if Cirie and Parvarti (Perhaps this game's versions of Stephanie and Rafe) let Amanda (Danni) into the finals then maybe
you deserve to lose. Eliza said it very well, a lot of players make the mistake of taking likeable people to the finals.
If Richard Hatch had let Rudy get into the Finals, Rudy would have won! If Jan/Helen had gotten into the finals they would have beaten Brian James/Pei Gee would have beaten Todd. easily. So if they are letting Amanda, who is clearly paying a much better social game this time get into the finals, with her hands clean. Well then one could argue that perhaps they deserve to lose because they were warned that Amanda would be hard to beat. After all it's not "just making moves" it's also convincing the rest to give you a million dollars...That's why you have to bring the goat to the finals. Not someone who everyone knows was a game player, but also stayed true to her alliances. |
|||