| Started By | Comment | ||
|---|---|---|---|
phoenixtobootcamp |
|||
|
Why won't you people just. let. it. die?
|
|||
survivoronline2005 |
|||
|
Dear God. I agree with Dr Will Hatch for once!
|
|||
Dr Will Hatch two point oh |
|||
|
Posts: 3849 (06/05/08 8:28 PM) Registered user |
I like you too
|
||
ArtieeLange1 |
|||
Dr Will Hatch two point oh wrote: Look at the big brain on Dr Will. You think you've discovered something, uncovered some flaw in my system or my thinking.
In doing so you failed to realize that you understand neither, and I will now enlighten your ignorance.
The crux of the problem with Survivor is that it offers advantages to certain players (weak) and disadvantages other players (strong) during the team-phase. Survivor mimics real life when this random, forced, semi-permanent teaming is over, and the individual immunity starts.
Thats what people like about most game-shows, contests, and sports; the fairness and meritocracy ensures that the best compete against the best.
Big sporting event coming up Saturday, the Belmont Stakes. Under Survivor system, "Big Brown" would not be in the race because the lesser
competitors would have mobbed up and voted him off. Then you have a race, a finale, of weaklings, something no one wants.
That in a nutshell is why Survivor ratings are dropping like bird shit, whether you can accept that or not.
Last Edited By: ArtieeLange1
06/05/08 9:14 PM.
Edited 1 times.
|
|||
m0t0 maj1 |
|||
|
Where did Dr Will become sarcastic in his post?
|
|||
SFC |
|||
ArtieeLange1 wrote:I'm pretty sure viewers enjoy entertaining characters. Take Cook Islands and Fiji for instance, both seasons "Strong" yet boring characters were the ones who made around near the end (Yul, Ozzy, Adam, Nate, Earl, Alex, Boo, Mookie, Edgardo). Yet the ones that were the most talked about and Fan Favorites were the "Weak" (Cao Boi, Jonathan (to an extent), and Yau Man). Only James and Ozzy are the two "Strong" contestants to be favorites. And James was popular for his personality not his Challenge wins, while Ozzy was the only real Immunity favorite. And about Big Brown, it would suck under the Survivor rules because that is not what the fans want to see, They want to see a good game. It's just like what would happen to Survivor under your system the fans want to see Blindsides, Backstabbing, and Lying. |
|||
tdugan333 |
|||
|
Teams then a merge (challenge ability, wits, social game are all in play): Initially, the "weak" will be voted off for the most part in order for the team to continue to win immunity until the merge After that the alliances tend to re-form and
new strategies put into play. It's anyone's game at this point. Social strategy, backstabbing, secret deals, blindsides and alliance betrayals galore
the entire 39 glorious days. Yay! Fun stuff!
No Teams no real merge (completely challenge based): The "strongest" player on the losing side will be voted off in almost every possible instance in order for the "weak" to stay in the game and move up closer to the winning side. The losing "weak" players will most certainly circle the "strongest" player like sharks after chum to get them out of there. No strategy needed what so ever. "Hey guys JoeBlow one one challenge already and we haven't....kthxbye." Zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz |
|||
pinoyako |
|||
|
Will this ever end?
|
|||
Shallownage |
|||
|
Not as long as Artie has his way.
|
|||
m0t0 maj1 |
|||
|
Did he ever?
|
|||
Shallownage |
|||
|
Nope, not yet anyways.
|
|||
tdugan333 |
|||
|
Sorry, sorry. No mas.
|
|||
ArtieeLange1 |
|||
oh ehm gee wrote: What makes RR vs RW different, and better, is that competitive players remain because the teams need them and want them.
The exact opposite of Survivor.
oh ehm gee wrote: You unknowingly prove my point, once again. The final challenge in RW/RR challenge are inherently biased against teams with more weak people, and inherently
biased in favor of teams with more strong people.
The exact opposite of Survivor.
Last Edited By: ArtieeLange1
06/06/08 6:24 AM.
Edited 1 times.
|
|||
oh ehm gee |
|||
|
Seriously people, LET THIS SHIT DIE. It's clear that no one is going to change their opinion anytime soon. So we can either keep talking in circles,
boiling away the donations until we have ads in our posts again, or we can just stop and focus on the important things: clues to the identity of the Mole!
|
|||
Dr Will Hatch two point oh |
|||
|
Posts: 3851 (06/06/08 8:08 PM) Registered user |
ArtieeLange1 wrote: Who cares who has an advantage? If a strongman isn't cunning or lucky enough to mitigate the effects of an evil fascist like Chet, he should have played better. Your assuming that the weak folk will always band together,is this true? Lets look at every single tribe in Survivor history to see if your Marxian prospects ring true Pagong-Well yes, they voted out Joel, but you could argue that Greg and Gretchen would never leave in the team phase, which would work since their the best survivalists.So this ones up in the air Tagi-Well,the Tagi 4 weren't exactly the heirs of Hercules, so you might be right. But was Dirk really all that strong in the long run? Eventually he would have ran out of gas Ogakor-With Kel yes, with Mad Dog and Mitchell,no. So your wrong on this one. Kucha-Nope,the strong prospered.They didn't need Debb or Kimmi Boran-Nope, the strong prospered Samburu-It wasn't weak vs strong,it was young vs old. NuBoran-Hard to say, but I seriously doubt Ethan or Clarence would have been booted from this tribe NuSamburu-Nope Maraamu-Robs a tough guy, so is Sean, so nope,your theory is still wrong NuMaraaumu-They clearly kept the stongest folk for what they had, eh, maybe they didn't,hard to say NuRotu-John,Tammy and arguably The General were all strong Chuay Ghan-The strongest went to the end except for John Sook Jai-You've got me on this one Tambaqui-Yeah, you're right here too Jaburu-Hard to tell,they were all strong women NuTambaqui-no NuJaburu-No Drake-Yes Morgan-No Mogo Mogo- Yes Chapera-No Saboga-Yes,cept for Rupert NuMogo Mog-Hells yes NuChapera-No Lopevi-Yes,this is the most obvious example in your defense, but its only an isolated incident Yasur-Well they won didn't they? The strong women must have stayed NuYasur-Depends on your interpretation NuLopevi-No,John K would of flipped Koror-Not at all Ulong-Yes and No Yaxha-No Nakum-No NUYaxha-No NuNakum-No Casaya(older women)-yes Casaya(weirdo tribe)-Except for Bobdawg,no La Mina-Hell no Hiki-Yes(from what we could see) Aitu(Latin tribe)-No Aitu(Jonathans initial tribe)-No Raro(Adams initial tribe)-No Raro(post mutiny)-No Ravu-No Moto-No NuMoto-No NuRavu-Not at all Fei Long-Depends.JR was strong,but so was everyone else Zhan Hu-Apparently not NuFei Long-No NuZhan Hu-Yes Malakal-No Airai-Yes NuMalakal-No NuAirai-No So obviously your wrong, unless you interpret it differently, but I think I'm mostly spot on. Certain tribes vote out the strong to insure their own survival. Should Chris have blown his brains out just so Brady could have advanced? Survivor is NOT a sporting event. Under your system it would be, and thats bullshit. It comes down to whether you want Survivor to be like a sport or not,most of us don't.It cheapens the whole point of the show. I like the microcosm aspect better.Survivor is primarily watched by people to be entertained and occasionally enthralled,but editing aside,Survivor is actually a good potrait of how human beings act.If it was just about Darwinism, it would be insulting the audiences intelligence. But I have to admit, you are partially right about the drop in viewers. People stoped watching once they realized that nobody was actually going to die on the show, and that the show was more about the internal politics of the castaways, and that the term "Survivor" was just a metaphor. I'm disapointed a little bit too actually,I wish there was still wild out there. And I have nothing against alpha players,they just need to back it up with the right stuff |
||
ArtieeLange1 |
|||
Dr Will Hatch two point oh wrote: Again you miss the whole point, which is that "playing better" is not what determines a players status, it is the good luck or bad luck of being
randomly forced onto specific team.
|
|||
ArtieeLange1 |
|||
tdugan333 wrote: Happens all the time, just ask Chet and Kathy
tdugan333 wrote: And that player can blame his/herself for being on that "losing side".
Much better than what happens now; the "strongest" player on randomly selected semi-permanent "team" voted off.
|
|||
tubecam |
|||
pinoyako wrote: No, he has an idea that so many people think is stupid that he will have to defend it perpetually against any and all reasonable persons. |
|||
pinoyako |
|||
ArtieeLange1 wrote: dumbass. kathy is not voted off. |
|||
doc |
|||
ArtieeLange1 wrote: So now you admit the fundamental problem with your idea. With no need for a team to do well, it's not the weakest of the weak that gets eliminated, it's the strongest of the weak. Halfway through you're left with the very strongest overall and the very weakest overall. Is that what you want to see, because I can't see that showing lasting for 16 years in the top 20. And what happens if a really strong player like Ozzie slips and loses his balance during a challenge and winds up in the loser group. Do you really think he'll be able to survive that TC? So then do we add a rule that gives a player individual immunity the first time they're in the loser group coming over from the winners? Why do we even have a show? Just give the Terrys and the Ozzies a million just for being so awesome. What's your obsession with destroying Survivor? Who do you work for? |
|||