Yuku free message boards

Screerider wrote:

---

ml66uk2 wrote:

---

And it's not just "a little bit of skin". It's actually the most sensitive part of a man's penis (if it hasn't been cut off that is).

That's a great argument for circumcision. If I was even more sensitive, I'd never get anything done and sex would last 2 seconds (if I'm lucky).

That and wanting one's dick to look like most porn stars' dicks. Well, the het ones. Wouldn't know if uncuts are more prevalent in the gae porn, but they're not the norm in straight.

In some countries, there are articulate, educated circumcised women who say that it's improved their sex lives btw. I don't believe them either.

I just don't see how a circumcised man can know how good sex is supposed to be. Sure you can have great sex without a foreskin, but I just don't see how it can possibly be as good. I know where I'm most sensitive (by far), and if I was circumcised, the most important parts just wouldn't be there. The glans itself isn't all that sensitive.

If someone's too sensitive, it's not actually a huge problem to fix anyway. You can train yourself to last longer, or even use a desensitizer if it's really bad. I'd be a lot more worried about not having enough sensitivity. I don't know how old you are, but you lose a lot of sensitivity as you get older. You might wish you were more sensitive when you're 50 or 60.

I don't know about gay porn either, but in the UK, being circumcised is more of a gay thing (except for Muslims and Jews). If it's hard, you normally can't tell whether someone's circed or not anyway, unless you're looking for the color change or the scar line, and let's face it, no-one straight's going to be looking that close.