ArtieeLange wrote:It removes all strategy from the game.
There is no valid argument against my system, as I just proved again.
See how easy it is to refute points when all I do is cut out small portions of what people say?
0 Kudos
- Survivor Sucks
- Lions, Tigers, Survivors - Oh My!
- Survivor Spoilers
- MESS Hall Tribal Council
- MESS Hall Archive
- Survivor Speculation
- Survivor 21+
- The Amazing Race
- Big Brother
- Big Brother - PAST SEASONS
- The Apprentice
- American Idol
- American Idol PAST SEASONS
- The Mole
- Lost
- Other Shows That Suck
- Off Topic
- Clubs That Suck. No, Really.
- The Dump
- Monster Island
- Purgatory
- FAQ
- In Memory, 9/11/01
An idea to improve Survivor so that weaklings dont comprise the finals
| Started By | Comment | ||
|---|---|---|---|
 Kitty Pryde1 |
|||
|
Posts: 5834 (10/13/08 12:04 PM) |
See how easy it is to refute points when all I do is cut out small portions of what people say? |
||
|
Dr Will Hatch two point oh |
|||
|
Posts: 5405 (10/13/08 12:42 PM) Registered user |
Bobby Jon goes apeshit wrote: Well, it's certainly funnier. |
||
|
ArtieeLange |
|||
|
Posts: 261 (10/13/08 8:27 PM) |
Kitty Pryde1 wrote: That's like saying the current system removes all strategy from the game, after the merge. There is no valid argument against my system, as I just proved again. |
||
|
BobBob77 |
|||
|
Posts: 1366 (10/13/08 8:28 PM) |
It is nothing like saying that.
|
||
|
Kitty Pryde1 |
|||
|
Posts: 5839 (10/13/08 10:11 PM) |
ArtieeLange wrote: Post-merge: Do you vote out a strong player as a threat, or do you keep him (c'mon, if you're voting anyone out as a physical threat, it's a him, at least according to your views, Artiee) around as either a leader or as an extra vote? Do you vote out a physical threat or a strategic threat? Your system: Vote out the strongest person of the losers, based on overall performances in challenges, basically fucking anyone who's really good at challenges and has bad luck in ONE round. |
||
|
Dr Will Hatch two point oh |
|||
|
Posts: 5413 (10/13/08 10:41 PM) Registered user |
Actually Kitty, you are doing a bad job of defending yourself. Artiee, I have a question. Would you extend this "merit based system" past the merge
if you thought it would increase ratings?
|
||
|
BobBob77 |
|||
|
Posts: 1375 (10/14/08 2:50 PM) |
It's like you want more people to hate you.
|
||
|
Dr Will Hatch two point oh |
|||
|
Posts: 5427 (10/14/08 2:58 PM) Registered user |
Hes a troll, of course he does. Either that, or the most narrow minded person on Sucks.
|
||
|
ArtieeLange |
|||
|
Posts: 262 (10/14/08 10:10 PM) |
Dr Will Hatch two point oh wrote:You are just going to lower her self-esteem even more 
Dr Will Hatch two point oh wrote:Who cares about ratings, I don't get paid by CBS, ratings are just a by-product of an entertaining show (and lacking on a boring show), which is the point. The best way to start would be to keep the merge as it is, and only replace the team portion with my system. |
||
|
Kitty Pryde1 |
|||
|
Posts: 5843 (10/14/08 10:24 PM) |
I swear, you don't even understand your own system anymore, and even worse, you don't understand the reasoning behind implementing your system.
|
||
|
ArtieeLange |
|||
|
Posts: 263 (10/15/08 3:05 PM) |
Kitty Pryde1 wrote:Why don't you follow up your infantile "swear" with some elaboration on wtf you're talking about. |
||
|
Kitty Pryde1 |
|||
|
Posts: 5852 (10/15/08 8:35 PM) |
ArtieeLange wrote: You want me to mention how you've changed the rules of your system about four times since the start of the thread after people pointed out undebatable flaws, or the fact that your whole reasoning for changing Survivor is because it gets crappy ratings, and now you're saying ratings don't matter. P.S. A show isn't interesting because of a bunch of players no one cares about competing in challenges, unless you turn those challenges into a complete joke, like Wipeout. By making Survivor all about the challenges, you make it boring, because no one gives a shit about the cast and it's no fun to watch them succeed, thus ratings drop off, and you've killed Survivor. That's all your system would do. It'd kill a show that still gets over 13 million viewers per episode just because you're a shithead who doesn't like watching losers succeed because you're a loser and yet you never succeed at anything, including creating this retarded system. |
||
|
Thailandsurvivor |
|||
|
Posts: 2133 (10/15/08 8:46 PM) |
Am I the only one who thought it was ArtieLarge? Now, I have new faith in this topic.
But actually, I saw an ORG with this kind of format, and it seemed to have worked out pretty well. Then again, I havn't read all the episodes so I'm not 100%. http://z4.invisionfree.co...vivorPhantasma/index.php? |
||
|
Kitty Pryde1 |
|||
|
Posts: 5854 (10/15/08 9:20 PM) |
Don't bring up ORGs. Artiee already says they don't matter, which he'll have to stick to, even if it benefits his case.
|
||
|
ArtieeLange |
|||
|
Posts: 264 (10/16/08 2:29 PM) |
Kitty Pryde1 wrote:Precisely, Rosie. You do that, and do it now. Kitty Pryde1 wrote:You have proven over a dozen times how low your reading comprehension is, and there it is again. My reasoning for changing Survivor is because the current system is boring, and I prefer to be entertained. That the ratings have decreased every season is evidence that the current system is boring to the original Survivor fans. That does not mean I care about the ratings, Rosie. |
||
|
2 Timer |
|||
|
Posts: 72 (10/16/08 2:33 PM) |
I like this
|
||
|
finishthemoff |
|||
|
Posts: 11547 (10/16/08 2:37 PM) Registered user |
Who are you?
|
||
|
BobBob77 |
|||
|
Posts: 1416 (10/16/08 2:38 PM) |
ArtieeLange1 wrote: Actually Artiee, I think you do care. |
||
|
Kitty Pryde1 |
|||
|
Posts: 5857 (10/16/08 4:56 PM) |
ArtieeLange wrote: It's boring to YOU, and given that the only people who would want to watch your system are dumbass MTV fans who already don't give a shit about Survivor, I don't see why CBS should alienate the core fanbase to appease one person. Besides, regardless of all the dumb shit you say, you still watch the show. You bitch and moan about how boring it is, yet you still watch the show. You see, you're in a catch 22 situation, Artiee. You can't watch the show, because then you'd be proven as a hypocrite and a liar for all this bullshit about your system when you're going to watch the show anyway. And you can't NOT watch the show, because then if you're proven wrong, as you've been proven wrong several times this season, you have no way of defending against it because you don't know the context of the episode. Either way, you're never going to stop watching Survivor, no one on this forum is dumb enough to think your system would actually work, and you're just an attention whore that acts like a bully over the internet because you're a fatass loser in real life who can't get any respect. |
||
|
Kitty Pryde1 |
|||
|
Posts: 5885 (10/17/08 10:27 AM) |
Yeah, your system just got fucking OWNED. GC was the weakest member who wanted to quit. Sugar, while weak, did not want to quit. It would've been SMART to boot Sugar because she had the idol, and you would bitch about weaklings booting the strong. But they were STUPID and voted out the worst competitor in the game. So yeah, your system sucks and the current system doesn't need to be changed. It's working just fine. |
||
- Survivor Sucks
- Lions, Tigers, Survivors - Oh My!
- Survivor Spoilers
- MESS Hall Tribal Council
- MESS Hall Archive
- Survivor Speculation
- Survivor 21+
- The Amazing Race
- Big Brother
- Big Brother - PAST SEASONS
- The Apprentice
- American Idol
- American Idol PAST SEASONS
- The Mole
- Lost
- Other Shows That Suck
- Off Topic
- Clubs That Suck. No, Really.
- The Dump
- Monster Island
- Purgatory
- FAQ
- In Memory, 9/11/01
