pastordice wrote:
Well technically his meat looks great

| Started By | Comment | ||
|---|---|---|---|
dettigersnw22 |
|||
pastordice wrote: |
|||
fat little fingers |
|||
|
The Kellyburger comes with triple cheese.
|
|||
Warrior |
|||
|
Excellent recap post flf.
Hit refresh if you don't see week 5. .......
|
|||
OnlyTheHunter |
|||
|
:-) 70% eliminate Crystal, one vote to her for the win!
Pretty consistent for the season for Marcus. Randy's stats look like Penner's from Cook Islands just slightly less visible. CP with Tone all over the place. Michael |
|||
BlakeB717 |
|||
|
Warrior, flf voted UTR for Susie.
|
|||
Warrior |
|||
|
I know Blake...it says UTR1.
|
|||
BlakeB717 |
|||
|
omg LOL tricky boy!!!!!!!!!
|
|||
Kaizer |
|||
|
Only guys huh
|
|||
fat little fingers |
|||
|
Warrior, you realize there's now going to be a serious push for a gray UTR1 don't you? Or are you the one
leading the pack? ;-)
|
|||
Skyline |
|||
Warrior wrote: |
|||
unduli clone |
|||
|
Ooh, Crystal got an OTTN. Delicious. |
|||
tropical rain |
|||
|
I was so confused until I looked at the graph closely... good one Warrior. XD
|
|||
Kitty Pryde1 |
|||
|
I still say that Susie as UTR is extremely wrong. I mean, we have Charlie who's UTR1 with just one confessional.
|
|||
unduli clone |
|||
|
^ So you're saying Charlie should be INV too, or that he was way more visible than Susie? I agree with flf's reasoning behind his UTR1 choice. She received SPV that developed her... UTR. |
|||
Warrior |
|||
|
^
But if it developed her shouldn's she be CP1? |
|||
Warrior |
|||
Electric Catfish - UTR1 Marcus: "There was this tiny little fish and every time you pick him up he sends a little electric charge through your hand." It might be damn little story and it might be there to support other people's stories (Marcus and Randy in this case), but it's story and that's not INV. Visibility - 1 from SPV |
|||
Kitty Pryde1 |
|||
Warrior wrote: And with sarcasm, Warrior proves my point nicely. |
|||
9RedWing19 |
|||
|
If people are going to push for a CP for the Catfish based on SPV, then I reserve the right to change the rating for "my" elephant from OTT to CP.
|
|||
TheLurkerSpeaks |
|||
fat little fingers wrote:FLF, Your impression is wrong. Look just a few of my posts above this observation of yours, and you'll see I specifically state that whether someone is likely to win has absolutely no bearing on whether they are CP. I objected to this standard when you raised it an episode ago to decide on OTT for Sugar, and I object again in this discussion. I can't speak for others, but I know my opinions on current ratings are not based at all upon Marcus being the likely winner. My analysis is, but my ratings are not. As I've been saying for awhile now, rate first, analyze afterwards. I don't know what you mean by "CP winner quotes". Winner quotes don't make a player CP. I discussed this with CL a few pages back, but ties with foreshadowing to the endgame may be complex editing, but it isn't CP editing if the personality inolved is not developed. |
|||
TheLurkerSpeaks |
|||
unduli clone wrote: Are we supposed to be rooting for ratings? I prefer accurate ratings to ones that improve or worsen a particular player's Edgic profile. Crystal did not have an OTTN edit this episode, and comparing her edit to OTTN's of the past shows just how ridiculous this is. I get the strong feeling many voted that way because they personally do not like her and wanted to eliminate her from Edgic consideration. That kind of thinking distorts the Edgic process, and I don't see it as something to be cheered. I suspect many of you believe I do the same (or the reverse in this case). I don't. I'm not particularly fond of Crystal as she's been portrayed, and I've said from the beginning that she's more or less the Gary Hogeboom of the season so probably does not win. I've kept her as Edgically viable because she should be, but I don't believe she wins. |
|||