Let's see........who really would feel good about Kenny winning? He has been shown over playing the game and has emerged as a liar. I am not sure the average viewer would feel good about that. I think the audience would be happy with a Matty, Sugar, or Bob win. Kenny or Susie......NO.And that, my friends is the power of editing. You've already labelled your season as "Earth's last Eden". You assign a certain kind of negative tone to those who haven't won, you portray the winner and a couple of others as the good guys. And voila: You have a titanic 'Good v Evil' (or ''Saints'' v ''Sinners'') which you trumpet at every opportunity.
Does anyone really, really believe that the producers can get away with one of the good guys not winning now?
And, TLS, I guess the theme of Crystal's edit, apart from the Olympian joke at her expense (lol at the slam dunk) and apart from her not being a team player (as per the inserted confessional after that IC) was her instability. As her final words about how she shouldn't have dissed Matty proved. Even the season's edited worst player (Kelly) was right about her. That's why that was shown and that was why Probst repeated it right after her.
















