...because it is impossible to know with arbitrary precision both WHOM/WHERE and WHEN when she will SUGARPWN her next victim!!!
...and she has nice particles!
| Started By | Comment | ||
|---|---|---|---|
micronesia |
Sugar is the living proof of the Heisenberg uncertainty principle... |
Lead | |
|
...because it is impossible to know with arbitrary precision both WHOM/WHERE and WHEN when she will SUGARPWN her next victim!!!
|
|||
LPalmer75 |
|||
|
I honestly think she gave up on the hope of winning some time ago which makes her a very dangerous player because she has no interest in keeping equally
disliked players in the game to further her chances. She realised a few shows ago she cannot win given her relationship with the people on the jury so it seems
her goal has been to go as far as possible while helping the "good guys" (in her eyes) win.
She has made some fantastic strategic moves in the last few weeks, yes she does seem to change on the wind in terms of her emotions and her alliances but if you accept she understands she cannot win whatever she does she really has made some smart plays. |
|||
pinoyako |
|||
|
soz Sugar just sealed her faith. She won't receive any jury votes.
|
|||
micronesia |
|||
LPalmer75 wrote:
She is truly a good person!
Last Edited By: micronesia
12/12/08 7:50 AM.
Edited 1 times.
|
|||
poshpixel |
|||
|
but sugar quits before jury speaks to them on the last TC. so dumb but touching at the same time.
|
|||
micronesia |
|||
|
I hope Randy and Corrinne dont make her cry too much at the FTC (unlikely, I know)...
|
|||
poshpixel |
|||
|
um, she actually quits before all those jury bombardings.
Last Edited By: poshpixel
12/12/08 7:48 AM.
Edited 1 times.
|
|||
SucksSucks |
|||
|
Make up your mind. Which is it?
|
|||
Eugene Schwindlemyer |
|||
LPalmer75 wrote: that is exactly what I was going to say. I think the most dangous person in the worl is the one with nothing to lose. sugar has nothing to lose, she is free to move as she sees fit, when and how she wants, even if it is on a whim. She wants to see good guys geet ahead, so she is taking that action, good for her, nothing wromg with playing according to your heart in stead of your stratigy it is just another way of playing. I think that sidpite all that has happened and if she has given up hope of wining, she still has a real shot at winning. |
|||
Beefcake |
|||
|
The fascination of Survivor has always been that it's a microcosm of society. And now we're seeing a player who is playing idealistically, not caring
if she wins, but wanting to make sure that an asshole doesn't win. There are people who live this way in real life, so it's interesting to watch. And
what I really like about Sugar is that she isn't sanctamonious about it. We've had plenty of high and mighty types who think only 'moral'
people should win, and I've always thought those people were idiots. Sugar doesn't sit there saying she's moral or honest; she's fine with
playing the game. She just doesn't want an ass to win.
|
|||
PrettyGoodYear1988 |
|||
|
Oh STFU! There is no such thing as a "good person" in Survivor anymore than there is a "good person" in a game of checkers. All Sugar's done is fuck over her own game because she can't separate gameplay from real life. She had a decent shot with Crystal and Susie in the F3 (she didn't know that the Onions were planning to vote in a block), and she blew it by getting all "moral" at the last minute. If that makes her a good person, does that make cutthroat "anything for the win" players like Cirie, Todd, Earl, Yul, or Stephenie "bad people"? There aren't "good people" or "bad people" in Survivor. There are only good players or bad players. How good of a player you are directly correlates to how well you position yourself to win, given the circumstances you have. Thus, Sugar is a bad player. |
|||
pearly whites |
|||
|
She's been on a fucking island eating termites for 36 days, and she's still a FATASS? How does that happen?
|
|||
petenale |
|||
PrettyGoodYear1988 wrote:---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- You can play cutthroat and be a 'good' person. Sugar didn't turn against Ken/Cystal becasue they were going to vote Matty off.. She didn;t turn because they turned member of their alliance. Sugar was going to vote for Matty also. She turned against them because of the rotton way they treated Matty once they decided he was going. She thought they could vote hin off without being mean to Matty. Maty had been a loyal ally and Sugar thougth he deserved better treatment even if he was getting voted off. Sugar is a great player. She understand the game and she has been controling or strongly influencing every vote since she blindsided Ace. How good of a player you are directly correlates to how well you position yourself to win, given the circumstances you have is not compltely tru or as least not teh whole truth. How good aplayer you are also correlates to how far you can advance and adjustment during the game given the circumstances you are in. It also depend on what you goals are. Sugar has decided she can't win but she want to go as far as she can and she wants to influnace who does win. She is doing great at that. |
|||
shoeless rye |
|||
|
Not playing to win is lame, and worse than quitting. Anybody can screw the game up for others when they are not trying to win.
|
|||
maersk |
|||
pearly whites wrote: you and i have radically different definitions of fat............... |
|||
micronesia |
|||
PrettyGoodYear1988 wrote: LOL, the "good person" comment was meant in regard of educating the audience about the Heisenberg uncertainty principle, which was a joke in the 1st place... I prefer cutthroat anytime, and of course Sugar is a retard for completely destroying the last glimpse of hope she had to win the whole thing, but thats not the point of this thread... |
|||
maersk |
|||
|
100,000 is a good consolation prize............
|
|||
ThrowMeGabon |
|||
|
I agree it wasn't predictable, but I don't think it lost her any jury votes. Crystal and Kenny are both gamers, and will appreciate a good game.
Meanwhile, I didn't think I'd ever see Corinne hootin and hollerin for a move by Sugar. Shit can happen, Sugar can still definitely win.
|
|||
EATYORICEGOHOME |
|||
petenale wrote: Rotten way they treated Matty? Look at what she did to Randy. Yes he was a troll and I found that whole tribal council to be the most hilarious moment of survivor, however was it completely necessary for her to laugh continuously and make him look stupid? Talk about beating someone when they're down. I mean she went to the extent of saying she hopes he dies alone. I love Sugar but thats a little hypocritical of her. And Matty whines all day about everything. If you remember he tried to get Crystal out and even voted for her the night Ace went home, but did she pout and have a hissy fit when that happened? No. However the minute Matty gets a vote he flips out! And if you recall Matty began the argument with Kenny. Yea him and Crystal went a little overboard, but nothing near what Sugar did to Randy. And plus how is Matty such a loyal ally? He didn't even become their ally until he decided to boot Randy. He even said it in one of his interviews, that when he voted for Randy, his closest ally in the game, he showed his loyalty to them. And last night after the reward challenge Matty says that he's been gunning for Crystal and Kenny since day 1, but you know thats all fair game, however if they vote Matty, he throws a temper tantrum. So this whole thing about playing for the good guys is a load of crap. Sugar is playing to lose, which is retarded. Why even sign up for the show? And her so called Good Guys (Matty the whiny ass who can talk the talk but can't walk the walk, and Bob the pathological liar) aren't really all that good. |
|||
maersk |
|||
|
i have no sympathy for randy...........the only thing that would have made his tribal council better would be him getting hit by a garbage truck on his way
down the path to exile.......
|
|||
chilibmom |
|||
Beefcake wrote: I agree. And I love her for this. Unlike Corrine Sugar is not sanctimonious. I hope she wins, but I doubt she will. I also would like to see Bob win too, and then Matty, then Ken. The last person I would like to see win would be Susie. |
|||