Good guy, don't get me wrong. But undeserving.

New Poll
| Started By | Comment | ||
|---|---|---|---|
indiekid26 |
|||
|
Ugh, I'm preparing myself for an unfortunate win by Bob. Completely undeserved and only because of a spiteful, bitter jury.
Good guy, don't get me wrong. But undeserving. |
|||
tutorial |
|||
indiekid26 wrote: Indie, I can't agree with you more. I like bitter juries towards the finalists but vote with their brain stating who played the best game. If it is a S/S/B finals, then Bob did play an average game, but he did not make power moves like what Sugar and Susie (Marcus boot) did; which is why I think he is undeserving. Compartively, Parvati played an amazing game in FvF, which makes her a great winner, even though I want Cirie to win badly. |
|||
Kirblar |
|||
|
It's just the nature of the game though- any player who powers out of the minority into the F3 via an IC run is very likely to win. But if a majority
player makes an IC run to the finals- it doesn't mean jack.
|
|||
Apple6666 |
|||
|
SF have Ken matty and F3 BSS
But ACME said matty 5th and kenny 4th. |
|||
tutorial |
|||
|
Hmm, seems like it would be a crappy end to an awesome season. It always happened this way. I am just glad that Miss Parvati Shallow won last season. :)
|
|||
shoeless rye |
|||
tutorial wrote: You don't think he is deserving because he has a penis. |
|||
WhoLetTheBlTCHout |
|||
|
Posts: 154 (12/14/08 05:39 PM) I don't take hints
|
indiekid26 wrote:
|
||
Apple6666 |
|||
|
what does ACME mean it is waiting on votes.
|
|||
BlueDamsel |
|||
|
S18 location confirmed. See S18+ forum. Logo too (the crew guy's drawing)
|
|||
The Marquesan Godfather |
|||
|
I support a Bob win just to see Edgic go crazy... again. |
|||
sunflower101 |
|||
|
Here is another interview with Jeff Probst about the Survivor Finale.
http://a1135.g.akamai.net...S-FM/jeffprobst121208.mp3 |
|||
uvawe |
|||
|
I'm ok with Bob winning, although I'd prefer it be Sugar. Either one is better than Kenny, Matty, or Susie IMO.
Edgic would self-destruct with a Bob win. |
|||
Apple6666 |
|||
|
SS What do you think ACME need they are waiting on votes.
|
|||
The Heartbreak Yid |
|||
indiekid26 wrote: Just out of curiosity, who really does deserve to win? First off, all of the people left are only there because of a well timed(for them anyway) tribal swap. The only remainig player who was a strategist of any kind was Kenny. Mattys did nothing. Sugar did nothing. Susie did less. At least Bob played around with his little fake immunity idols and pulled the wool over some heads and bought himself some more time. If it werent for said swap, we should be looking at a predictable final 3 with the onions, which could have at least got us some ammusing jury speeches. |
|||
Casey333 |
|||
uvawe wrote: A Bob win would sink edgic even worse than Danni's win, because at least then you could somewhat justify it because of the 2 returning players. This time there are no excuses. |
|||
sunflower101 |
|||
indiekid26 wrote:If Bob wins I don't get his edit at all. I am surprised if he is the winner he didn't get a heroic under dog edit. Bob is the type of winner that most of the audience is going to be happy with. So why didn't he get a better edit? |
|||
RobVanStratus |
|||
|
It doesn't matter who wins, Edgic will spin it so that they've pegged the winner somehow. I just would fucking LOVE Susie to win because it would
completely kill them. Or Sugar, since she's gotten a dreaded INV according to their charts, even though Kenny should have one as well, but apparently
solving a puzzle in a tribal IC in the 3rd episode and doing nothing else isn't invisible. Not to mention they split their ratings for the first episode
because even though it was clearly 2 episodes, it was shown as ONE.
|
|||
NeroRules |
|||
|
Bob's a nice guy, so I would be "okay" with him winning, but I agree that Sugar or Susie would have deserved it more if that's the F3.
It's kind of irrelevant to talk about a tribal swap being a factor in whether someone deserves to win or not because we don't know what might have
happened. For all we know, Fang might have still squeaked on by with Sugar's HI, and Susie switching sides. Imo, Bob would not even be there if it
weren't for Sugar because she's the one who was pushing for Randy to leave, and she's the one who warned Bob that Kenny was going to blindside him,
so she clearly deserves to win MUCH more than he does. He's just kind of been carried around, won a lot of IC's, made great fake idols, and let other
people plan out what to do with them (Sugar and Corrine). He's no Yau Man, for sure, but I guess he's a tolerable winner....
|
|||
survivorready |
|||
NeroRules wrote:I agree with everything u r saying except that Bob and Susie are pretty much on the same boat. It wasn't like Susie manipulated the whole Marcus Boot. It was mostly Crystal and a little bit of Kenny. Thats all she can be associated with in terms of "strategy". Wt seems wrong with ur statement is that u seem to be putting sugar and susie on the same boat. Sugar>>>Susie! |
|||
pjadedd |
|||
NeroRules wrote:While Susie did make a game-changing move, she has basically been invisible since then (which I don't think they're hiding some strategic genius). One move, in my opinion, doesn't make you deserving of the win. I do give her credit for making the final 3. I mean, when she was trying to make the deal with Marcus, I thought there was no way she was getting there. At least once Charlie left, Bob tried to make moves. If Susie was in that position, I imagine all she would do is offer up a vote. Valid (worked for Sandra), but not exactly the move of a strategic genius. As for Bob not having an underdog edit, there's really no way they could've given him one. Prior to the last swap, he was on the tribe that was in control. They could have shown a little more strategy (though, I remember a lot of people saying in interviews that he basically napped through strategy sessions), but it's hard to paint an underdog when he's on the more dominant tribe and part of the dominant alliance on that tribe (though, he was seen as expendable later on). |
|||