| Started By | Comment | ||
|---|---|---|---|
 Sir Viver |
Not Cool |
Lead | |
|
Posts: 1 (04/16/09 11:00 PM) |
So, Taj, Stephen and JT decide to blindside Brendan. Okay...I wouldn't have, but I guess they have some misguided plan. But why the double blindside?
Why not clue in Sierra? Leaving her to twist in the wind was totally uncool. That moved stripped away any respect or integrity that three may have had.
If Sierra gets voted off, I'll have nobody left to root for. |
||
|
Stanley McSmith |
|||
|
Posts: 9 (04/18/09 12:51 AM) |
Let me start by stressing that I am not attempting to suppress anyone's opinions, nor do I intend to demean Taj/Stephen/JT personally for his beliefs or
worldviews. But I do warrant that I must reach the broadest possible audience with the message that Taj/Stephen/JT was rather wide of the mark when he said
that he is always being misrepresented and/or persecuted.
Before you declare me effrontive, let me assert that it has been said that the similarities between Taj/Stephen/JT and drugged-out blockheads should not be taken lightly. I believe that to be true. I also believe that he contends that cannibalism, wife-swapping, and the murder of infants and the elderly are acceptable behavior. Excuse me, but where exactly did this little factoid come from? Do you ever get the feeling that his claims will surely lead to decay, to dissolution, to chaos, and to ruin? Well, you should because he is secretly planning to supply the chains that bind the individual to notions of self-loathing and unworthiness. I realize that that may sound rather conspiratorial and farfetched to most people, which is why you need to understand that Taj/Stephen/JT hates you-yes, you, because you, like me, want to stand uncompromised in a world that's on the brink of Taj/Stephen/JT-induced disaster. Taj/Stephen/JT is crazier than a road lizard. Which brings us to the harsh reality that must be faced: I'm willing to accept that I went puce with rage when I first heard Taj/Stephen/JT say that his causeries are a breath of fresh air amid our modern culture's toxic cloud of chaos. I'm even willing to accept that his proposed social programs are uniformly riddled by an unbelievable degree of ignorance. But I have one itsy-bitsy problem with his cop-outs. Videlicet, they produce culturally degenerate films and tapes. And that's saying nothing about how I recently received some mail in which the writer stated, "My contempt for Taj/Stephen/JT is boundless." I included that quote not because it is exceptional in any way, but rather because it is typical of much of the mail I receive. I included it to show you that I'm not the only one who thinks that my goal is to get Taj/Stephen/JT to realize that he turns to medieval legends of poisoned wells in order to frighten insolent, saturnine crackpots into forcing me to serve as a human shield for his bombardments. Of course, if he insists on remaining an ignorant, uninformed, and ill-informed despot, that's his prerogative. Taj/Stephen/JT wants nothing less than to impede the free flow of information, hence his repeated, almost hypnotic, insistence on the importance of his ignominious smears. He wants us to emulate the White Queen from Lewis Carroll's Through the Looking Glass, who strives to believe "as many as six impossible things before breakfast". Then again, even the White Queen would have trouble believing that children should belong to the state. I prefer to believe things that my experience tells me are true, such as that an armed revolt against Taj/Stephen/JT is morally justified. However, I think that it is not yet strategically justified. Is there anyone else out there who's noticed that his slaves must be exposed and neutralized wherever they lurk? I ask because some day, in the far, far future, he will realize that none of what he says carries any weight. This realization will sink in slowly but surely and will be accompanied by a comprehension of how there is a problem here. A very large, footling, lethargic problem. Here's the heart of the matter: Taj/Stephen/JT is doing everything in his power to make me expend all of my wit and energy in trivial pursuits. The only reason I haven't yet is that I believe in the four P's: patience, prayer, positive thinking, and perseverance. It's not just that part of the myth that Taj/Stephen/JT perpetuates is that he can change his pusillanimous ways but also that I correctly predicted that he would provide logorrheic spongers with a milieu in which they can focus too much on one side of the equation and not enough on the broader perspective of things. Alas, I didn't think he'd do that so effectively-or so soon. This is what Taj/Stephen/JT's followers try to prevent us from hearing about on radio and television or reading about in popular magazines and large-circulation papers, but that's really beside the point. Some would say that this is a platitude. Would that it were! Rather, Taj/Stephen/JT likes saying that misinformed freeloaders and intolerant, pathological barbarians should rule this country. Okay, that's a parody-but not a very gross one. In point of fact, Taj/Stephen/JT has recently been going around claiming that the Queen of England heads up the international drug cartel. You really have to tie your brain in knots to be gullible enough to believe that junk. I would fain expose the connections between the gruesome problems that face us and the key issues of autism and nonrepresentationalism but I'm a bit worried that Taj/Stephen/JT will retaliate by causing riots in the streets. I'm worried because if you're the type who dares to think for yourself, then you've probably already determined that his adulators believe that he is as innocent as a newborn lamb. It should not be surprising that they believe this, however. As we all know, minds that have been so maimed that they believe that people don't mind having their communities turned into war zones can believe anything, especially if it's false. When he was first found trying to pull the levers of neocolonialism and oil the gears of corporatism, I was scared. I was scared not only for my personal safety; I was scared for the people I love. And now that Taj/Stephen/JT is planning to take over society's eyes, ears, mind, and spirit, I'm downright terrified. The largest problem, however, is that we wouldn't have a problem with obstructionism if it weren't for Taj/Stephen/JT. Although he created the problem, aggravated the problem, and escalated the problem, Taj/Stephen/JT insists that he can solve the problem if we just grant him more power. How naïve does he think we are? Truly, Taj/Stephen/JT's scurrilous ideologies induce paralysis of the cerebrum. Let me try to explain what I mean by that in a single sentence: Taj/Stephen/JT likes to cite poll results that "prove" that it is better that a hundred thousand people should perish than that he should be even slightly inconvenienced. Really? Have you ever been contacted by one of his pollsters? Chances are good that you never have been contacted and never will be. Otherwise, the polls would show that if I withheld my feelings on this matter, I'd be no less avaricious than Taj/Stephen/JT. Taj/Stephen/JT's planning to exploit issues such as the global economic crisis and the increase in world terrorism in order to instigate planet-wide chaos. Planet-wide chaos is his gateway to global tyranny, which will in turn enable him to instill a general ennui. Thoughtful people are being forced to admit, after years of evading the truth, that I have been right. I was right when I said that Taj/Stephen/JT's cajoleries, though creative, are a yawning abyss of nihilism. I was right when I said that Taj/Stephen/JT has done inestimable damage to everything around him. And I was right when I said that we were put on this planet to be active, to struggle, and to exert a positive influence on the type of world that people will live in a thousand years from now. We were not put here to supplant national heroes with spineless gauleiters, as Taj/Stephen/JT might feel. Taj/Stephen/JT not only lies but he brags about his lying to his confreres. The next time he decides to arrest and detain his enemies indefinitely without charge, without trial, and without access to legal counsel, he should think to himself, cui bono?-who benefits? Mankind needs to do more to present a noble vision of who we were, who we are, and who we can potentially be. Understand, I am not condemning mankind for not doing enough; I am merely stating that Taj/Stephen/JT can't attack my ideas, so he attacks me. It could be worse, I suppose. He could lower this country's moral tone and depreciate its commercial integrity. Okay, I've written enough for one letter, so let me just finish by saying that Taj/Stephen/JT's head is so far in rectal defilade it would require major surgery to extricate it. |
||
|
SurvivorArctic |
|||
|
Posts: 16572 (04/18/09 12:53 AM) Not a team player
|
holy fuck
TOO LONG WILL NEVER READ Jesus Christ! WHo left the Retard Gate open? |
||
|
Mrpoopypants |
|||
|
Posts: 292 (04/18/09 1:15 AM) |
Stanley McSmith wrote: Regarding the comment in paragraph seven line one: What does Autism have to do with anything here ? Also Paragraph eight the end of line one and beginning of line two are redundant. |
||
|
WTFscissoring8 |
|||
|
Posts: 1115 (04/18/09 6:01 AM) |
I am angry. Angry that events have transpired that lead me to write this statement. I assume you already know that to my mind, Stanley McSmith's ruses show a degree of acrimonious sickness that even I didn't expect, but I have something more important to tell you. Here are a few points to ponder: 1. Stanley McSmith's contentious monographs are chockablock with careerism.
Those points may at first seem unrelated but when you connect the dots it becomes clear that while Stanley McSmith has been beating the drums of unilateralism, I've been trying to lead us all toward a better, brighter future. In doing so, I've learned that his opinion is that it is better that a hundred thousand people should perish than that he should be even slightly inconvenienced. Of course, opinions are like sphincters: we all have them. So let me tell you my opinion. My opinion is that someone just showed me a memo supposedly written by Stanley McSmith. The memo spells out his plans to overthrow western civilization through the destruction of its four pillars-family, nation, religion, and democracy. If this memo is authentic, it tells us that we've tolerated Stanley McSmith's amoral dissertations long enough. It's time to lose our patience and chill our kindness. It's time to compile readers' remarks and suggestions and use them to point out the glaring contradiction between Stanley McSmith's idealized view of militarism and reality. It's time to shout to the world that to Stanley McSmith's mind, two wrongs make a right. So that means that phallocentrism forms the core of any utopian society, right? No, not right. The truth is that Stanley McSmith uses racialism to strip the world of conversation, friendship, and love. That's the large elephant in the room that nobody talks about. Nevertheless, I certainly believe that people really ought to start talking about it because then they'd realize that Stanley McSmith likes forcing me to wind up in a straitjacket and locked in a padded cell. That's the most damnable thing about him. It's also why Stanley McSmith's accomplices are too lazy to place blame where it belongs-in the hands of Stanley McSmith and his illiterate, morally crippled rank-and-file followers. They just want to sit back, fasten their mouths on the public teats, and casually forget that when I was younger I wanted to teach what I call irrational quidnuncs about tolerance. I still want to do that but now I realize that it's quite easy for him to declaim my proposals. But when is Stanley McSmith going to provide an alternative proposal of his own? As you ponder the answer to that question, consider that I am not fooled by Stanley McSmith's mad and eristic rhetoric. I therefore gladly accept the responsibility of notifying others that that's just one side of the coin. The other side is that if I had my druthers, Stanley McSmith would never have had the opportunity to cripple his enemies politically, economically, socially, morally, and psychologically. As it stands, I never used to be particularly concerned about Stanley McSmith's stratagems. Any damned fool, or so I thought, could see that my cause is to encourage individuals to come out of their cocoons and flourish. I call upon men and women from all walks of life to support my cause with their life-affirming eloquence and indomitable spirit of human decency and moral righteousness. Only then will the whole world realize that Stanley McSmith's vaporings are not an abstract problem. They have very concrete, immediate, and unpleasant consequences. For instance, each rung on the ladder of exclusionism is a crisis of some kind. Each crisis supplies an excuse for Stanley McSmith to hurt others physically or emotionally. That is the standard process by which obdurate, vitriolic freebooters break down age-old institutions and customs. I claim that many incomprehensible prodigal-types are taken in by Stanley McSmith's attestation that you and I are morally inferior to petty tossers. Stanley McSmith will almost certainly tiptoe around that glaringly evident fact because if he didn't, you might come to realize that his janissaries remain largely silent when asked about the correlative connecting him to commercialism. The rare times they do deign to comment they invariably skew the issue to prevent people from realizing that Stanley McSmith's causing all sorts of problems for us. We must grasp these problems with both hands and deal with them in a forthright way. We must tell it like it is. If we fail in this, we are not failing someone else; we are not disrupting some interest separate from ourselves. Rather, it is
we who suffer when we neglect to observe that Stanley McSmith's lies come in many forms. Some of his lies are in the form of obloquies. Others are in the
form of off-the-cuff comments. Still more are in the form of folksy posturing and pretended concern and compassion. As I see it, if I were elected Ruler of the
World, my first act of business would be to defy Stanley McSmith. I would further use my position to inform certain segments of the Earth's population that
Stanley McSmith wants us to believe that we can solve all of our problems by giving him lots of money. We might as well toss that money down a well because
we'll never see it again. What we will see, however, is that Stanley McSmith possesses no significant intellectual skills whatsoever and has no interest in
erudition. Heck, he can't even spell or define "erudition", much less achieve it. In short, only chthonic tricksters are capable of imagining
that Stanley McSmith's way of life is correct and everyone else's isn't. What you really need to do to be convinced of that, however, is to study
the matter for yourself. I'll be happy to send you enough facts to get you started. Just write to me.
also:
Spoiler
|
||
|
TroubleInTampa |
|||
|
Posts: 4951 (04/18/09 6:14 AM) Registered user |
<3 WTF
|
||
|
Crush On Alex |
The old days | ||
|
Posts: 160 (04/18/09 6:55 AM) Registered user |
Reminiscent of the old days...when more Sucks members than not not only had, but also used a vocabulary bigger than there are genius cells in Coach's
brain.
|
||
|
Fokkerdr1 |
|||
|
Posts: 1379 (04/18/09 7:07 AM) Registered User |
|
||
|
MikeHaggarKJ |
|||
|
Posts: 900 (04/18/09 7:41 AM) |
i dont get why it was a bad move at all to get rid of brendan. hes strong, has an idol and is hella smart. calling him a threat would be an understatement.
especially when they chose to keep a goat instead. |
||
|
Surfing Hippo in Trouble |
|||
|
Posts: 958 (04/18/09 8:16 AM) |
MikeHaggarKJ wrote:X And its pretty obvious why they didn't keep Sierra because she was gone if Brendan had used the idol. In retrospect, it is kind of a good move on their part because now they can take advantage of Erinn's swing vote and go after Tyson/Coach/Merhag as long as Sierra doesn't go along with those three. |
||
|
JaniTholeMyDolly |
|||
|
Posts: 5980 (04/18/09 8:25 AM) Dicked....by Evel that is
|
SurvivorArctic wrote: It's like Scout posted or something! 
|
||
|
Dictatorship |
|||
|
Posts: 8504 (04/18/09 8:26 AM) |
I'd like to take a minute of your time to share some of my thoughts about JT with you. First, the misinformation: JT suggests that his philippics won't be used for political retribution. Where the heck did he come up with that? The answer is a bit of a taboo subject but that won't stop me from telling you. You see, you might say, "JT's attitudes, opinions, and aspirations are forged by a desire to stifle the voices of those who are simply seeking to be heard." Fine, I agree. But those of us who are too lazy or disinterested to look at our situation realistically and from a viewpoint that takes in the whole picture have no right to complain when he and his goons set the hoops through which we all must jump. Apparently, we can't stop him overnight. It takes time, patience and experience to detail the specific steps and objectives needed to thwart his recalcitrant schemes. JT's secret police have discounted their brain as a useless organ. And I can say that with a clear conscience because while we do nothing, those who play the blame game are gloating and smirking. And they will keep on gloating and smirking until we highlight all of the problems with JT's namby-pamby vituperations. Prudence is no vice. Cowardice-especially JT's noxious form of it-is. JT must have some sort of problem with reading comprehension. That's the only explanation I can come up with as to why JT accuses me of admitting that the health effects of secondhand smoke are negligible. What I actually said is that JT looks primarily at a person's superficial qualities such as physiognomy and mannerisms. I, in contrast, consider how likely a person is to treat the disease, not the symptoms. That's what's important to me. Either way, anti-intellectualism has served as the justification for the butchering, torture, and enslavement of more people than any other "ism". That's why it's JT's favorite; it makes it easy for him to glamorize drug usage. I may be questioning the regnant conventional wisdom by stating this but maybe JT thinks we want him to create a system of Maoism characterized by confidential files, closed courts, gag orders, and statutory immunity. Excuse me, but maybe I have never read anything he has written that I would consider wise, logical, pertinent, reasonable, or scientific. JT's statement that the majority of mumpish authoritarians are heroes, if not saints, is no exception. What's more, his memoranda are geared toward the continuation of social stratification under the rubric of "tradition". Funny, that was the same term that JT's devotees once used to popularize a genre of music whose graphic lyrics explicitly urge impertinent prigs to treat people's bona fide personal devastation as bathos. Perhaps one day we will live in a world where good people are not troubled by fear of dysfunctional fomenters of revolution. Until that day arrives, however, we must spread the word that it may seem difficult at first to lay out some ideas and interpretations that hold the potential for insight. It is. But if a cogent, logical argument entered JT's brain, no doubt a concussion would result. Just don't expect consistency from a man who is absolutely and definitely acrimonious. On a television program last night, I heard one of this country's top scientists conclude that, "JT's adulators lay down diktats that force me to burst into +$%*!, as though it were a disgrace to tell you a little bit about JT and his dissolute pronouncements." That's exactly what I have so frequently argued and I am pleased to have my view confirmed by so eminent an individual. I have often maintained that reasonable people can reasonably disagree. Unfortunately, when dealing with JT and his underlings, that claim assumes facts not in evidence. So let me claim instead that JT's belief systems do not represent progress. They represent insanity masquerading as progress. Am I being too idealistic-a Pollyanna-when I suggest that all we need to do is break the neck of his policy of pessimism once and for all? I don't think so. Admittedly, I'm giving JT the benefit of the doubt, which is more than he's ever given me, but his ability to reason from premise to conclusion is nearly non-existent. Don't make the mistake of thinking otherwise. JT does, and that's why he demands absolute and blind obedience from his faithfuls. If he didn't, they might question his orders to destroy everything beautiful and good. This unrelenting demand of obedience also implies that JT recently claimed that a richly evocative description of a problem automatically implies the correct solution to that problem. I would have found this comment shocking had I not heard similar garbage from him a hundred times before. So that there may be no misunderstanding, let me make it clear that rigid adherence to dogmatic purity will lead only to disunity while we clearly need unity to set the record straight. That's just a fancy way of saying that JT likes to brag about how the members of his club are ideologically diverse. Perhaps that means that some of them prefer Stalin over Hitler. In any case, I indubitably don't believe that everyone and everything discriminates against JT-including the writing on the bathroom stalls. So when he says that that's what I believe, I see how little he understands my position. From a purely technical point of view, people tell me that JT's epigrams are merely a fig leaf that hides his efforts to mobilize support for the special interests that dominate state and private activity. And the people who tell me this are correct, of course. As I make no claim to be an authority on the subject, I defer to the judgments of an Oxford University professor, who has observed that we can no longer afford to do nothing about JT's contumacious projects. Instead, we must strike while the iron is hot and prevent his brain-damaged prevarications from spreading like a malignant tumor. Although the Gospel According to JT says that the rest of us are an inferior group of people, fit only to be enslaved, beaten, and butchered at the whim of our betters, I think that he claims to be fighting for equality. What JT's really fighting for, however, is equality in degradation, by which I mean that now that I've been exposed to JT's invectives I must admit that I don't completely understand them. Perhaps I need to get out more. Or perhaps there is still hope for our society, real hope-not the false sense of hope that comes from the mouths of eccentric pettifoggers but the hope that makes you eager to stick to the facts and offer only those arguments that can be supported by those facts. I can't predict the future, but I do know this: I can say one thing about JT. He understands better than any of us that psychological impact is paramount-not facts, not anybody's principles, not right and wrong. I'm not suggesting that we behave likewise. I'm suggesting only that if you can go more than a minute without hearing JT talk about alcoholism, you're either deaf, dumb, or in a serious case of denial. One indication of this is the fact that his understrappers actually believe the bunkum they're always mouthing. That's because these sorts of pesky, directionless troublemakers are idealistic, have no sense of history or human nature, and they think that what they're doing will somehow improve the world sometime soon. In reality, of course, JT unquestionably yearns for the Oriental despotisms of pre-Hellenic times, the neolithic culture that preceded the rise of self-consciousness and egoism. By the same token, he abhors the current era, in which people are free to offer true constructive criticism-listening to the whole issue, recognizing the problems, recognizing what is being done right, and getting involved to help remedy the problem. When people say that bigotry and hate are alive and well, they're right. And JT is to blame. His programs of Gleichschaltung have paid off: Already, he has had some success in his efforts to undermine everyone's capacity to see, or change, the world as a whole. Although it requires risk, commitment, and follow-through to shield people from his adversarial and disloyal deceptions, he claims that "the truth", "the whole truth", and "nothing but the truth" are three different things. I respond that he has come very close to making me turn pale and run for cover. The problem with JT is not that he's whiney. It's that he wants to don the mantel of allotheism and rouse the agitated petite bourgeoisie to chauvinistic fervor and hoodwink them into turning the trickle of materialism into a tidal wave. Even his rank-and-file followers couldn't deal with the full impact of his traducements. That's why they created "JT-ism," which is just a rotten excuse to perpetuate inaccurate and dangerous beliefs about male-female relationships. Some day, I want to fight tooth and nail against JT. But you don't have to wait for that. What you can do now is talk to everyone you know about the things I've told you in this letter. Use every medium available to you. Use the Internet. Use your telephone. Use radio and newspapers. And whatever you do, never be afraid to speak out against the evil that is JT. ETA: typos This took me a good 20+ minutes to type, so I want some worthy responses.
Last Edited By: Dictatorship
04/18/09 8:30 AM.
Edited 2 times.
|
||
|
JaniTholeMyDolly |
|||
|
Posts: 5981 (04/18/09 8:39 AM) Dicked....by Evel that is
|
WTFscissoring8 wrote:WTFScissioring, I normaly agree with you, but you're wrong. But this is MY point, as illustrated below: [1] Coach is the dragon slayer. Sierra is the poo of the dragon, so Coach must slay the poo also. The head of the dragon is gone now, so they just have a dragon torso left at camp. Clearly, Taj is NOT the dragon and is the snake. Son, Coach will slay the snake. He will THEN become the snake slayer. [2] If any of our earls or barons, or anyone else holding from us in chief by military service should die, and should his heir be of full age and owe relief, the heir is to have his inheritance for the ancient relief, namely the heir or heirs of an earl for a whole county £100, the heir or heirs of a baron for a whole barony 100 marks, the heir or heirs of a knight for a whole knight's fee 100 shillings at most, and he who owes less will give less, according to the ancient custom of (knights') fees. [3] If, however, the heir of such a person is under age, his lord is not to have custody of him and his land until he has taken homage from the heir, and after such an heir has been in custody, when he comes of age, namely at twenty-one years old, he is to have his inheritance without relief and without fine, saving that if, whilst under age, he is made a knight, his land will nonetheless remain in the custody of his lords until the aforesaid term. [4] The keeper of the land of such an heir who is under age is only to take reasonable receipts from the heir's land and reasonable customs and reasonable services, and this without destruction or waste of men or things. And if we assign custody of any such land to a sheriff or to anyone else who should answer to us for the issues, and such a person should commit destruction or waste, we will take recompense from him and the land will be assigned to two law-worthy and discreet men of that fee who will answer to us or to the person to whom we assign such land for the land's issues. And if we give or sell to anyone custody of any such land and that person commits destruction or waste, he is to lose custody and the land is to be assigned to two law-worthy and discreet men of that fee who similarly will answer to us as is aforesaid. [5] The keeper, for as long as he has the custody of the land of such (an heir), is to maintain the houses, parks, fishponds, ponds, mills and other things pertaining to that land from the issues of the same land, and he will restore to the heir, when the heir comes to full age, all his land stocked with ploughs and all other things in at least the same condition as when he received it. All these things are to be observed in the custodies of archbishoprics, bishoprics, abbeys, priories, churches and vacant offices which pertain to us, save that such custodies ought not to be sold. [6] Heirs are to be married without disparagement. [7] A widow, after the death of her husband, is immediately and without any difficulty to have her marriage portion and her inheritance, nor is she to pay anything for her dower or her marriage portion or for her inheritance which her husband and she held on the day of her husband's death, and she shall remain in the chief dwelling place of her husband for forty days after her husband's death, within which time dower will be assigned her if it has not already been assigned, unless that house is a castle, and if it is a castle which she leaves, then a suitable house will immediately be provided for her in which she may properly dwell until her dower is assigned to her in accordance with what is aforesaid, and in the meantime she is to have her reasonable necessities (estoverium) from the common property. As dower she will be assigned the third part of all the lands of her husband which were his during his lifetime, save when she was dowered with less at the church door. No widow shall be distrained to marry for so long as she wishes to live without a husband, provided that she gives surety that she will not marry without our assent if she holds of us, or without the assent of her lord, if she holds of another. [8] Neither we nor our bailiffs will seize any land or rent for any debt, as long as the existing chattels of the debtor suffice for the payment of the debt and as long as the debtor is ready to pay the debt, nor will the debtor's guarantors be distrained for so long as the principal debtor is able to pay the debt; and should the principal debtor default in his payment of the debt, not having the means to repay it, or should he refuse to pay it despite being able to do so, the guarantors will answer for the debt and, if they wish, they are to have the lands and rents of the debtor until they are repaid the debt that previously they paid on behalf of the debtor, unless the principal debtor can show that he is quit in respect to these guarantors. [9] The city of London is to have all its ancient liberties and customs. Moreover we wish and grant that all other cities and boroughs and vills and the barons of the Cinque Ports and all ports are to have all their liberties and free customs. [10] No-one is to be distrained to do more service for a knight's fee or for any other free tenement than is due from it. [11] Common pleas are not to follow our court but are to be held in a certain fixed place. [12] Recognisances of novel disseisin and of mort d'ancestor are not to be taken save in their particular counties and in the following way. We or, should we be outside the realm, our chief justiciar, will send our justices once a year to each county, so that, together with the knights of the counties, that may take the aforesaid assizes in the counties; and those assizes which cannot be completed in that visitation of the county by our aforesaid justices assigned to take the said assizes are to be completed elsewhere by the justices in their visitation; and those which cannot be completed by them on account of the difficulty of various articles (of law) are to be referred to our justices of the Bench and completed there. [13] Assizes of darrein presentment are always to be taken before our justices of the Bench and are to be completed there. [14] A freeman is not to be amerced for a small offence save in accordance with the manner of the offence, and for a major offence according to its magnitude, saving his sufficiency (salvo contenemento suo), and a merchant likewise, saving his merchandise, and any villain other than one of our own is to be amerced in the same way, saving his necessity (salvo waynagio) should he fall into our mercy, and none of the aforesaid amercements is to be imposed save by the oath of honest and law-worthy men of the neighbourhood. Earls and barons are not to be amerced save by their peers and only in accordance with the manner of their offence. [15] No town or free man is to be distrained to make bridges or bank works save for those that ought to do so of old and by right. [16] No bank works of any sort are to be kept up save for those that were in defense in the time of King H(enry II) our grandfather and in the same places and on the same terms as was customary in his time. [17] No sheriff, constable, coroner or any other of our bailiffs is to hold pleas of our crown. [18] If anyone holding a lay fee from us should die, and our sheriff or bailiff shows our letters patent containing our summons for a debt that the dead man owed us, our sheriff or bailiff is permitted to attach and enroll all the goods and chattels of the dead man found in lay fee, to the value of the said debt, by view of law-worthy men, so that nothing is to be removed thence until the debt that remains is paid to us, and the remainder is to be released to the executors to discharge the will of the dead man, and if nothing is owed to us from such a person, all the chattels are to pass to the (use of) the dead man, saving to the dead man's wife and children their reasonable portion. [19] No constable or his bailiff is to take corn or other chattels from anyone who not themselves of a vill where a castle is built, unless the constable or his bailiff immediately offers money in payment of obtains a respite by the wish of the seller. If the person whose corn or chattels are taken is of such a vill, then the constable or his bailiff is to pay the purchase price within forty days. [20] No constable is to distrain any knight to give money for castle guard if the knight is willing to do such guard in person or by proxy of any other honest man, should the knight be prevented from doing so by just cause. And if we take or send such a knight into the army, he is to be quit of (castle) guard in accordance with the length of time the we have him in the army for the fee for which he has done service in the army. [21] No sheriff or bailiff of ours or of anyone else is to take anyone's horses or carts to make carriage, unless he renders the payment customarily due, namely for a two-horse cart ten pence per day, and for a three-horse cart fourteen pence per day. No demesne cart belonging to any churchman or knight or any other lady (sic) is to be taken by our bailiffs, nor will we or our bailiffs or anyone else take someone else's timber for a castle or any other of our business save by the will of he to whom the timber belongs. [22] We shall not hold the lands of those convicted of felony save for a year and a day, whereafter such land is to be restored to the lords of the fees. [23] All fish weirs (kidelli) on the Thames and the Medway and throughout England are to be entirely dismantled, save on the sea coast. [24] The writ called 'praecipe' is not to be issued to anyone in respect to any free tenement in such a way that a free man might lose his court. [25] There is to be a single measure for wine throughout our realm, and a single measure for ale, and a single measure for Corn, that is to say the London quarter, and a single breadth for dyed cloth, russets, and haberjects, that is to say two yards within the lists. And it shall be the same for weights as for measures. [26] Henceforth there is to be nothing given for a writ of inquest from the person seeking an inquest of life or member, but such a writ is to be given freely and is not to be denied. [27] If any persons hold from us at fee farm or in socage or burgage, and hold land from another by knight service, we are not, by virtue of such a fee farm or socage or burgage, to have custody of the heir or their land which pertains to another's fee, nor are we to have custody of such a fee farm or socage or burgage unless this fee farm owes knight service. We are not to have the custody of an heir or of any land which is held from another by knight service on the pretext of some small serjeanty held from us by service of rendering us knives or arrows or suchlike things. [28] No bailiff is henceforth to put any man on his open law or on oath simply by virtue of his spoken word, without reliable witnesses being produced for the same. [29] No freeman is to be taken or imprisoned or disseised of his free tenement or of his liberties or free customs, or outlawed or exiled or in any way ruined, nor will we go against such a man or send against him save by lawful judgement of his peers or by the law of the land. To no-one will we sell or deny of delay right or justice. [30] All merchants, unless they have been previously and publicly forbidden, are to have safe and secure conduct in leaving and coming to England and in staying and going through England both by land and by water to buy and to sell, without any evil exactions, according to the ancient and right customs, save in time of war, and if they should be from a land at war against us and be found in our land at the beginning of the war, they are to be attached without damage to their bodies or goods until it is established by us or our chief justiciar in what way the merchants of our land are treated who at such a time are found in the land that is at war with us, and if our merchants are safe there, the other merchants are to be safe in our land. [31] If anyone dies holding of any escheat such as the honour of Wallingford, Boulogne, Nottingham, Lancaster or of other escheats which are in our hands and which are baronies, his heir is not to give any other relief or render any other service to us that would not have been rendered to the baron if the barony were still held by a baron, and we shall hold such things in the same way as the baron held them, nor, on account of such a barony or escheat, are we to have the escheat or custody of any of our men unless the man who held the barony or the escheat held elsewhere from us in chief. [32] No free man is henceforth to give or sell any more of his land to anyone, unless the residue of his land is sufficient to render due service to the lord of the fee as pertains to that fee. [33] All patrons of abbeys which have charters of the kings of England over advowson or ancient tenure or possession are to have the custody of such abbeys when they fall vacant just as they ought to have and as is declared above. [34] No-one is to be taken or imprisoned on the appeal of woman for the death of anyone save for the death of that woman's husband. [35] No county court is to be held save from month to month, and where the greater term used to be held, so will it be in future, nor will any sheriff or his bailiff make his tourn through the hundred save for twice a year and only in the place that is due and customary, namely once after Easter and again after Michaelmas, and the view of frankpledge is to be taken at the Michaelmas term without exception, in such a way that every man is to have his liberties which he had or used to have in the time of King H(enry II) my grandfather or which he has acquired since. The view of frankpledge is to be taken so that our peace be held and so that the tithing is to be held entire as it used to be, and so that the sheriff does not seek exceptions but remains content with that which the sheriff used to have in taking the view in the time of King H(enry) our grandfather. [36] Nor is it permitted to anyone to give his land to a religious house in such a way that he receives it back from such a house to hold, nor is it permitted to any religious house to accept the land of anyone in such way that the land is restored to the person from whom it was received to hold. If anyone henceforth gives his land in such a way to any religious house and is convicted of the same, the gift is to be entirely quashed and such land is to revert to the lord of that fee. [37] Scutage furthermore is to be taken as it used to be in the time of King H(enry) our grandfather, and all liberties and free customs shall be preserved to archbishops, bishops, abbots, priors, Templars, Hospitallers, earls, barons and all others, both ecclesiastical and secular persons, just as they formerly had. All these aforesaid customs and liberties which we have granted to be held in our realm in so far as pertains to us are to be observed by all of our realm, both clergy and laity, in so far as pertains to them in respect to their own men. For this gift and grant of these liberties and of others contained in our charter over the liberties of the forest, the archbishops, bishops, abbots, priors, earls, barons, knights, fee holders and all of our realm have given us a fifteenth part of all their movable goods. Moreover we grant to them for us and our heirs that neither we nor our heirs will seek anything by which the liberties contained in this charter might be infringed or damaged, and should anything be obtained from anyone against this it is to count for nothing and to be held as nothing. With these witnesses: the lord S(tephen) archbishop of Canterbury, E(ustace) bishop of London, J(ocelin) bishop of Bath, P(eter) bishop of Winchester, H(ugh) bishop of Lincoln, R(ichard) bishop of Salisbury, W. bishop of Rochester, W(illiam) bishop of Worcester, J(ohn) bishop of Ely, H(ugh) bishop of Hereford, R(anulf) bishop of Chichester, W(illiam) bishop of Exeter, the abbot of (Bury) St Edmunds, the abbot of St Albans, the abbot of Battle, the abbot of St Augustine's Canterbury, the abbot of Evesham, the abbot of Westminster, the abbot of Peterborough, the abbot of Reading, the abbot of Abingdon, the abbot of Malmesbury, the abbot of Winchcombe, the abbot of Hyde (Winchester), the abbot of Chertsey, the abbot of Sherborne, the abbot of Cerne, the abbot of Abbotsbury, the abbot of Milton (Abbas), the abbot of Selby, the abbot of Cirencester, H(ubert) de Burgh the justiciar, H. earl of Chester and Lincoln, W(illiam) earl of Salisbury, W(illiam) earl Warenne, G. de Clare earl of Gloucester and Hertford, W(illiam) de Ferrers earl of Derby, W(illiam) de Mandeville earl of Essex, H(ugh) Bigod earl of Norfolk, W(illiam) earl Aumale, H(umphrey) earl of Hereford, J(ohn) constable of Chester, R(obert) de Ros, R(obert) fitz Walter, R(obert) de Vieuxpont, W(illiam) Brewer, R(ichard) de Montfiquet, P(eter) fitz Herbert, W(illiam) de Aubigné, G. Gresley, F. de Braose, J(ohn) of Monmouth, J(ohn) fitz Alan, H(ugh) de Mortemer, W(illiam) de Beauchamp, W(illiam) de St John, P(eter) de Maulay, Brian de Lisle, Th(omas) of Moulton, R(ichard) de Argentan, G(eoffrey) de Neville, W(illiam) Mauduit, J(ohn) de Baalon and others. Given at Westminster on the eleventh day of February in the ninth year of our reign. We, holding these aforesaid gifts and grants to be right and welcome, conceed and confirm them for ourselves and our
heirs and by the terms of the present (letters) renew them, wishing and granting for ourselves and our heirs that the aforesaid charter is to be firmly and
inviably observed in all and each of its articles in perpetuity, including any articles contained in the same charter which by chance have not to date been
observed. In testimony of which we have had made these our letters patent. Witnessed by Edward our son, at Westminster on the twelfth day of October in the
twenty-fifth year of our reign. (Chancery warranty by John of) Stowe.
|
||
|
gabonguerrero |
|||
|
Posts: 346 (04/18/09 8:42 AM) |
Best thread ever!
|
||
|
Licorice |
|||
|
Posts: 1081 (04/18/09 8:45 AM) |
Clearly, education is a commodity. In order to stand out these days, you've got to be a moron - but in a new and innovative way.
|
||
|
JaniTholeMyDolly |
|||
|
Posts: 5982 (04/18/09 8:49 AM) Dicked....by Evel that is
|
Licorice wrote: True. Or, you can just copy and paste the Magna Carta like I did.
|
||
|
kishuu |
|||
|
Posts: 1627 (04/18/09 10:43 AM) |
Scunt has arrived in this thread.
|
||
|
Quiddity |
|||
|
Posts: 5272 (04/18/09 10:53 AM) Registered User |
Let me start by stressing that I am not attempting to suppress anyone's opinions, nor do I intend to demean Taj/Stephen/JT personally for his beliefs or
worldviews. But I do warrant that I must reach the broadest possible audience with the message that Taj/Stephen/JT was rather wide of the mark when he said
that he is always being misrepresented and/or persecuted.
Before you declare me effrontive, let me assert that it has been said that the similarities between Taj/Stephen/JT and drugged-out blockheads should not be taken lightly. I believe that to be true. I also believe that he contends that cannibalism, wife-swapping, and the murder of infants and the elderly are acceptable behavior. Excuse me, but where exactly did this little factoid come from? Do you ever get the feeling that his claims will surely lead to decay, to dissolution, to chaos, and to ruin? Well, you should because he is secretly planning to supply the chains that bind the individual to notions of self-loathing and unworthiness. I realize that that may sound rather conspiratorial and farfetched to most people, which is why you need to understand that Taj/Stephen/JT hates you-yes, you, because you, like me, want to stand uncompromised in a world that's on the brink of Taj/Stephen/JT-induced disaster. Taj/Stephen/JT is crazier than a road lizard. Which brings us to the harsh reality that must be faced: I'm willing to accept that I went puce with rage when I first heard Taj/Stephen/JT say that his causeries are a breath of fresh air amid our modern culture's toxic cloud of chaos. I'm even willing to accept that his proposed social programs are uniformly riddled by an unbelievable degree of ignorance. But I have one itsy-bitsy problem with his cop-outs. Videlicet, they produce culturally degenerate films and tapes. And that's saying nothing about how I recently received some mail in which the writer stated, "My contempt for Taj/Stephen/JT is boundless." I included that quote not because it is exceptional in any way, but rather because it is typical of much of the mail I receive. I included it to show you that I'm not the only one who thinks that my goal is to get Taj/Stephen/JT to realize that he turns to medieval legends of poisoned wells in order to frighten insolent, saturnine crackpots into forcing me to serve as a human shield for his bombardments. Of course, if he insists on remaining an ignorant, uninformed, and ill-informed despot, that's his prerogative. Taj/Stephen/JT wants nothing less than to impede the free flow of information, hence his repeated, almost hypnotic, insistence on the importance of his ignominious smears. He wants us to emulate the White Queen from Lewis Carroll's Through the Looking Glass, who strives to believe "as many as six impossible things before breakfast". Then again, even the White Queen would have trouble believing that children should belong to the state. I prefer to believe things that my experience tells me are true, such as that an armed revolt against Taj/Stephen/JT is morally justified. However, I think that it is not yet strategically justified. Is there anyone else out there who's noticed that his slaves must be exposed and neutralized wherever they lurk? I ask because some day, in the far, far future, he will realize that none of what he says carries any weight. This realization will sink in slowly but surely and will be accompanied by a comprehension of how there is a problem here. A very large, footling, lethargic problem. Here's the heart of the matter: Taj/Stephen/JT is doing everything in his power to make me expend all of my wit and energy in trivial pursuits. The only reason I haven't yet is that I believe in the four P's: patience, prayer, positive thinking, and perseverance. It's not just that part of the myth that Taj/Stephen/JT perpetuates is that he can change his pusillanimous ways but also that I correctly predicted that he would provide logorrheic spongers with a milieu in which they can focus too much on one side of the equation and not enough on the broader perspective of things. Alas, I didn't think he'd do that so effectively-or so soon. This is what Taj/Stephen/JT's followers try to prevent us from hearing about on radio and television or reading about in popular magazines and large-circulation papers, but that's really beside the point. Some would say that this is a platitude. Would that it were! Rather, Taj/Stephen/JT likes saying that misinformed freeloaders and intolerant, pathological barbarians should rule this country. Okay, that's a parody-but not a very gross one. In point of fact, Taj/Stephen/JT has recently been going around claiming that the Queen of England heads up the international drug cartel. You really have to tie your brain in knots to be gullible enough to believe that junk. I would fain expose the connections between the gruesome problems that face us and the key issues of autism and nonrepresentationalism but I'm a bit worried that Taj/Stephen/JT will retaliate by causing riots in the streets. I'm worried because if you're the type who dares to think for yourself, then you've probably already determined that his adulators believe that he is as innocent as a newborn lamb. It should not be surprising that they believe this, however. As we all know, minds that have been so maimed that they believe that people don't mind having their communities turned into war zones can believe anything, especially if it's false. When he was first found trying to pull the levers of neocolonialism and oil the gears of corporatism, I was scared. I was scared not only for my personal safety; I was scared for the people I love. And now that Taj/Stephen/JT is planning to take over society's eyes, ears, mind, and spirit, I'm downright terrified. The largest problem, however, is that we wouldn't have a problem with obstructionism if it weren't for Taj/Stephen/JT. Although he created the problem, aggravated the problem, and escalated the problem, Taj/Stephen/JT insists that he can solve the problem if we just grant him more power. How naïve does he think we are? Truly, Taj/Stephen/JT's scurrilous ideologies induce paralysis of the cerebrum. Let me try to explain what I mean by that in a single sentence: Taj/Stephen/JT likes to cite poll results that "prove" that it is better that a hundred thousand people should perish than that he should be even slightly inconvenienced. Really? Have you ever been contacted by one of his pollsters? Chances are good that you never have been contacted and never will be. Otherwise, the polls would show that if I withheld my feelings on this matter, I'd be no less avaricious than Taj/Stephen/JT. Taj/Stephen/JT's planning to exploit issues such as the global economic crisis and the increase in world terrorism in order to instigate planet-wide chaos. Planet-wide chaos is his gateway to global tyranny, which will in turn enable him to instill a general ennui. Thoughtful people are being forced to admit, after years of evading the truth, that I have been right. I was right when I said that Taj/Stephen/JT's cajoleries, though creative, are a yawning abyss of nihilism. I was right when I said that Taj/Stephen/JT has done inestimable damage to everything around him. And I was right when I said that we were put on this planet to be active, to struggle, and to exert a positive influence on the type of world that people will live in a thousand years from now. We were not put here to supplant national heroes with spineless gauleiters, as Taj/Stephen/JT might feel. Taj/Stephen/JT not only lies but he brags about his lying to his confreres. The next time he decides to arrest and detain his enemies indefinitely without
charge, without trial, and without access to legal counsel, he should think to himself, cui bono?-who benefits? Mankind needs to do more to present a
noble vision of who we were, who we are, and who we can potentially be. Understand, I am not condemning mankind for not doing enough; I am merely stating that
Taj/Stephen/JT can't attack my ideas, so he attacks me. It could be worse, I suppose. He could lower this country's moral tone and depreciate its
commercial integrity. Okay, I've written enough for one letter, so let me just finish by saying that Taj/Stephen/JT's head is so far in rectal defilade
it would require major surgery to extricate it.
Before you declare me effrontive, let me assert that it has been said that the similarities between Taj/Stephen/JT and drugged-out blockheads should not be taken lightly. I believe that to be true. I also believe that he contends that cannibalism, wife-swapping, and the murder of infants and the elderly are acceptable behavior. Excuse me, but where exactly did this little factoid come from? Do you ever get the feeling that his claims will surely lead to decay, to dissolution, to chaos, and to ruin? Well, you should because he is secretly planning to supply the chains that bind the individual to notions of self-loathing and unworthiness. I realize that that may sound rather conspiratorial and farfetched to most people, which is why you need to understand that Taj/Stephen/JT hates you-yes, you, because you, like me, want to stand uncompromised in a world that's on the brink of Taj/Stephen/JT-induced disaster. Taj/Stephen/JT is crazier than a road lizard. Which brings us to the harsh reality that must be faced: I'm willing to accept that I went puce with rage when I first heard Taj/Stephen/JT say that his causeries are a breath of fresh air amid our modern culture's toxic cloud of chaos. I'm even willing to accept that his proposed social programs are uniformly riddled by an unbelievable degree of ignorance. But I have one itsy-bitsy problem with his cop-outs. Videlicet, they produce culturally degenerate films and tapes. And that's saying nothing about how I recently received some mail in which the writer stated, "My contempt for Taj/Stephen/JT is boundless." I included that quote not because it is exceptional in any way, but rather because it is typical of much of the mail I receive. I included it to show you that I'm not the only one who thinks that my goal is to get Taj/Stephen/JT to realize that he turns to medieval legends of poisoned wells in order to frighten insolent, saturnine crackpots into forcing me to serve as a human shield for his bombardments. Of course, if he insists on remaining an ignorant, uninformed, and ill-informed despot, that's his prerogative. Taj/Stephen/JT wants nothing less than to impede the free flow of information, hence his repeated, almost hypnotic, insistence on the importance of his ignominious smears. He wants us to emulate the White Queen from Lewis Carroll's Through the Looking Glass, who strives to believe "as many as six impossible things before breakfast". Then again, even the White Queen would have trouble believing that children should belong to the state. I prefer to believe things that my experience tells me are true, such as that an armed revolt against Taj/Stephen/JT is morally justified. However, I think that it is not yet strategically justified. Is there anyone else out there who's noticed that his slaves must be exposed and neutralized wherever they lurk? I ask because some day, in the far, far future, he will realize that none of what he says carries any weight. This realization will sink in slowly but surely and will be accompanied by a comprehension of how there is a problem here. A very large, footling, lethargic problem. Here's the heart of the matter: Taj/Stephen/JT is doing everything in his power to make me expend all of my wit and energy in trivial pursuits. The only reason I haven't yet is that I believe in the four P's: patience, prayer, positive thinking, and perseverance. It's not just that part of the myth that Taj/Stephen/JT perpetuates is that he can change his pusillanimous ways but also that I correctly predicted that he would provide logorrheic spongers with a milieu in which they can focus too much on one side of the equation and not enough on the broader perspective of things. Alas, I didn't think he'd do that so effectively-or so soon. This is what Taj/Stephen/JT's followers try to prevent us from hearing about on radio and television or reading about in popular magazines and large-circulation papers, but that's really beside the point. Some would say that this is a platitude. Would that it were! Rather, Taj/Stephen/JT likes saying that misinformed freeloaders and intolerant, pathological barbarians should rule this country. Okay, that's a parody-but not a very gross one. In point of fact, Taj/Stephen/JT has recently been going around claiming that the Queen of England heads up the international drug cartel. You really have to tie your brain in knots to be gullible enough to believe that junk. I would fain expose the connections between the gruesome problems that face us and the key issues of autism and nonrepresentationalism but I'm a bit worried that Taj/Stephen/JT will retaliate by causing riots in the streets. I'm worried because if you're the type who dares to think for yourself, then you've probably already determined that his adulators believe that he is as innocent as a newborn lamb. It should not be surprising that they believe this, however. As we all know, minds that have been so maimed that they believe that people don't mind having their communities turned into war zones can believe anything, especially if it's false. When he was first found trying to pull the levers of neocolonialism and oil the gears of corporatism, I was scared. I was scared not only for my personal safety; I was scared for the people I love. And now that Taj/Stephen/JT is planning to take over society's eyes, ears, mind, and spirit, I'm downright terrified. The largest problem, however, is that we wouldn't have a problem with obstructionism if it weren't for Taj/Stephen/JT. Although he created the problem, aggravated the problem, and escalated the problem, Taj/Stephen/JT insists that he can solve the problem if we just grant him more power. How naïve does he think we are? Truly, Taj/Stephen/JT's scurrilous ideologies induce paralysis of the cerebrum. Let me try to explain what I mean by that in a single sentence: Taj/Stephen/JT likes to cite poll results that "prove" that it is better that a hundred thousand people should perish than that he should be even slightly inconvenienced. Really? Have you ever been contacted by one of his pollsters? Chances are good that you never have been contacted and never will be. Otherwise, the polls would show that if I withheld my feelings on this matter, I'd be no less avaricious than Taj/Stephen/JT. Taj/Stephen/JT's planning to exploit issues such as the global economic crisis and the increase in world terrorism in order to instigate planet-wide chaos. Planet-wide chaos is his gateway to global tyranny, which will in turn enable him to instill a general ennui. Thoughtful people are being forced to admit, after years of evading the truth, that I have been right. I was right when I said that Taj/Stephen/JT's cajoleries, though creative, are a yawning abyss of nihilism. I was right when I said that Taj/Stephen/JT has done inestimable damage to everything around him. And I was right when I said that we were put on this planet to be active, to struggle, and to exert a positive influence on the type of world that people will live in a thousand years from now. We were not put here to supplant national heroes with spineless gauleiters, as Taj/Stephen/JT might feel. Taj/Stephen/JT not only lies but he brags about his lying to his confreres. The next time he decides to arrest and detain his enemies indefinitely without
charge, without trial, and without access to legal counsel, he should think to himself, cui bono?-who benefits? Mankind needs to do more to present a
noble vision of who we were, who we are, and who we can potentially be. Understand, I am not condemning mankind for not doing enough; I am merely stating that
Taj/Stephen/JT can't attack my ideas, so he attacks me. It could be worse, I suppose. He could lower this country's moral tone and depreciate its
commercial integrity. Okay, I've written enough for one letter, so let me just finish by saying that Taj/Stephen/JT's head is so far in rectal defilade
it would require major surgery to extricate it.
Before you declare me effrontive, let me assert that it has been said that the similarities between Taj/Stephen/JT and drugged-out blockheads should not be taken lightly. I believe that to be true. I also believe that he contends that cannibalism, wife-swapping, and the murder of infants and the elderly are acceptable behavior. Excuse me, but where exactly did this little factoid come from? Do you ever get the feeling that his claims will surely lead to decay, to dissolution, to chaos, and to ruin? Well, you should because he is secretly planning to supply the chains that bind the individual to notions of self-loathing and unworthiness. I realize that that may sound rather conspiratorial and farfetched to most people, which is why you need to understand that Taj/Stephen/JT hates you-yes, you, because you, like me, want to stand uncompromised in a world that's on the brink of Taj/Stephen/JT-induced disaster. Taj/Stephen/JT is crazier than a road lizard. Which brings us to the harsh reality that must be faced: I'm willing to accept that I went puce with rage when I first heard Taj/Stephen/JT say that his causeries are a breath of fresh air amid our modern culture's toxic cloud of chaos. I'm even willing to accept that his proposed social programs are uniformly riddled by an unbelievable degree of ignorance. But I have one itsy-bitsy problem with his cop-outs. Videlicet, they produce culturally degenerate films and tapes. And that's saying nothing about how I recently received some mail in which the writer stated, "My contempt for Taj/Stephen/JT is boundless." I included that quote not because it is exceptional in any way, but rather because it is typical of much of the mail I receive. I included it to show you that I'm not the only one who thinks that my goal is to get Taj/Stephen/JT to realize that he turns to medieval legends of poisoned wells in order to frighten insolent, saturnine crackpots into forcing me to serve as a human shield for his bombardments. Of course, if he insists on remaining an ignorant, uninformed, and ill-informed despot, that's his prerogative. Taj/Stephen/JT wants nothing less than to impede the free flow of information, hence his repeated, almost hypnotic, insistence on the importance of his ignominious smears. He wants us to emulate the White Queen from Lewis Carroll's Through the Looking Glass, who strives to believe "as many as six impossible things before breakfast". Then again, even the White Queen would have trouble believing that children should belong to the state. I prefer to believe things that my experience tells me are true, such as that an armed revolt against Taj/Stephen/JT is morally justified. However, I think that it is not yet strategically justified. Is there anyone else out there who's noticed that his slaves must be exposed and neutralized wherever they lurk? I ask because some day, in the far, far future, he will realize that none of what he says carries any weight. This realization will sink in slowly but surely and will be accompanied by a comprehension of how there is a problem here. A very large, footling, lethargic problem. Here's the heart of the matter: Taj/Stephen/JT is doing everything in his power to make me expend all of my wit and energy in trivial pursuits. The only reason I haven't yet is that I believe in the four P's: patience, prayer, positive thinking, and perseverance. It's not just that part of the myth that Taj/Stephen/JT perpetuates is that he can change his pusillanimous ways but also that I correctly predicted that he would provide logorrheic spongers with a milieu in which they can focus too much on one side of the equation and not enough on the broader perspective of things. Alas, I didn't think he'd do that so effectively-or so soon. This is what Taj/Stephen/JT's followers try to prevent us from hearing about on radio and television or reading about in popular magazines and large-circulation papers, but that's really beside the point. Some would say that this is a platitude. Would that it were! Rather, Taj/Stephen/JT likes saying that misinformed freeloaders and intolerant, pathological barbarians should rule this country. Okay, that's a parody-but not a very gross one. In point of fact, Taj/Stephen/JT has recently been going around claiming that the Queen of England heads up the international drug cartel. You really have to tie your brain in knots to be gullible enough to believe that junk. I would fain expose the connections between the gruesome problems that face us and the key issues of autism and nonrepresentationalism but I'm a bit worried that Taj/Stephen/JT will retaliate by causing riots in the streets. I'm worried because if you're the type who dares to think for yourself, then you've probably already determined that his adulators believe that he is as innocent as a newborn lamb. It should not be surprising that they believe this, however. As we all know, minds that have been so maimed that they believe that people don't mind having their communities turned into war zones can believe anything, especially if it's false. When he was first found trying to pull the levers of neocolonialism and oil the gears of corporatism, I was scared. I was scared not only for my personal safety; I was scared for the people I love. And now that Taj/Stephen/JT is planning to take over society's eyes, ears, mind, and spirit, I'm downright terrified. The largest problem, however, is that we wouldn't have a problem with obstructionism if it weren't for Taj/Stephen/JT. Although he created the problem, aggravated the problem, and escalated the problem, Taj/Stephen/JT insists that he can solve the problem if we just grant him more power. How naïve does he think we are? Truly, Taj/Stephen/JT's scurrilous ideologies induce paralysis of the cerebrum. Let me try to explain what I mean by that in a single sentence: Taj/Stephen/JT likes to cite poll results that "prove" that it is better that a hundred thousand people should perish than that he should be even slightly inconvenienced. Really? Have you ever been contacted by one of his pollsters? Chances are good that you never have been contacted and never will be. Otherwise, the polls would show that if I withheld my feelings on this matter, I'd be no less avaricious than Taj/Stephen/JT. Taj/Stephen/JT's planning to exploit issues such as the global economic crisis and the increase in world terrorism in order to instigate planet-wide chaos. Planet-wide chaos is his gateway to global tyranny, which will in turn enable him to instill a general ennui. Thoughtful people are being forced to admit, after years of evading the truth, that I have been right. I was right when I said that Taj/Stephen/JT's cajoleries, though creative, are a yawning abyss of nihilism. I was right when I said that Taj/Stephen/JT has done inestimable damage to everything around him. And I was right when I said that we were put on this planet to be active, to struggle, and to exert a positive influence on the type of world that people will live in a thousand years from now. We were not put here to supplant national heroes with spineless gauleiters, as Taj/Stephen/JT might feel. Taj/Stephen/JT not only lies but he brags about his lying to his confreres. The next time he decides to arrest and detain his enemies indefinitely without
charge, without trial, and without access to legal counsel, he should think to himself, cui bono?-who benefits? Mankind needs to do more to present a
noble vision of who we were, who we are, and who we can potentially be. Understand, I am not condemning mankind for not doing enough; I am merely stating that
Taj/Stephen/JT can't attack my ideas, so he attacks me. It could be worse, I suppose. He could lower this country's moral tone and depreciate its
commercial integrity. Okay, I've written enough for one letter, so let me just finish by saying that Taj/Stephen/JT's head is so far in rectal defilade
it would require major surgery to extricate it.
Before you declare me effrontive, let me assert that it has been said that the similarities between Taj/Stephen/JT and drugged-out blockheads should not be taken lightly. I believe that to be true. I also believe that he contends that cannibalism, wife-swapping, and the murder of infants and the elderly are acceptable behavior. Excuse me, but where exactly did this little factoid come from? Do you ever get the feeling that his claims will surely lead to decay, to dissolution, to chaos, and to ruin? Well, you should because he is secretly planning to supply the chains that bind the individual to notions of self-loathing and unworthiness. I realize that that may sound rather conspiratorial and farfetched to most people, which is why you need to understand that Taj/Stephen/JT hates you-yes, you, because you, like me, want to stand uncompromised in a world that's on the brink of Taj/Stephen/JT-induced disaster. Taj/Stephen/JT is crazier than a road lizard. Which brings us to the harsh reality that must be faced: I'm willing to accept that I went puce with rage when I first heard Taj/Stephen/JT say that his causeries are a breath of fresh air amid our modern culture's toxic cloud of chaos. I'm even willing to accept that his proposed social programs are uniformly riddled by an unbelievable degree of ignorance. But I have one itsy-bitsy problem with his cop-outs. Videlicet, they produce culturally degenerate films and tapes. And that's saying nothing about how I recently received some mail in which the writer stated, "My contempt for Taj/Stephen/JT is boundless." I included that quote not because it is exceptional in any way, but rather because it is typical of much of the mail I receive. I included it to show you that I'm not the only one who thinks that my goal is to get Taj/Stephen/JT to realize that he turns to medieval legends of poisoned wells in order to frighten insolent, saturnine crackpots into forcing me to serve as a human shield for his bombardments. Of course, if he insists on remaining an ignorant, uninformed, and ill-informed despot, that's his prerogative. Taj/Stephen/JT wants nothing less than to impede the free flow of information, hence his repeated, almost hypnotic, insistence on the importance of his ignominious smears. He wants us to emulate the White Queen from Lewis Carroll's Through the Looking Glass, who strives to believe "as many as six impossible things before breakfast". Then again, even the White Queen would have trouble believing that children should belong to the state. I prefer to believe things that my experience tells me are true, such as that an armed revolt against Taj/Stephen/JT is morally justified. However, I think that it is not yet strategically justified. Is there anyone else out there who's noticed that his slaves must be exposed and neutralized wherever they lurk? I ask because some day, in the far, far future, he will realize that none of what he says carries any weight. This realization will sink in slowly but surely and will be accompanied by a comprehension of how there is a problem here. A very large, footling, lethargic problem. Here's the heart of the matter: Taj/Stephen/JT is doing everything in his power to make me expend all of my wit and energy in trivial pursuits. The only reason I haven't yet is that I believe in the four P's: patience, prayer, positive thinking, and perseverance. It's not just that part of the myth that Taj/Stephen/JT perpetuates is that he can change his pusillanimous ways but also that I correctly predicted that he would provide logorrheic spongers with a milieu in which they can focus too much on one side of the equation and not enough on the broader perspective of things. Alas, I didn't think he'd do that so effectively-or so soon. This is what Taj/Stephen/JT's followers try to prevent us from hearing about on radio and television or reading about in popular magazines and large-circulation papers, but that's really beside the point. Some would say that this is a platitude. Would that it were! Rather, Taj/Stephen/JT likes saying that misinformed freeloaders and intolerant, pathological barbarians should rule this country. Okay, that's a parody-but not a very gross one. In point of fact, Taj/Stephen/JT has recently been going around claiming that the Queen of England heads up the international drug cartel. You really have to tie your brain in knots to be gullible enough to believe that junk. I would fain expose the connections between the gruesome problems that face us and the key issues of autism and nonrepresentationalism but I'm a bit worried that Taj/Stephen/JT will retaliate by causing riots in the streets. I'm worried because if you're the type who dares to think for yourself, then you've probably already determined that his adulators believe that he is as innocent as a newborn lamb. It should not be surprising that they believe this, however. As we all know, minds that have been so maimed that they believe that people don't mind having their communities turned into war zones can believe anything, especially if it's false. When he was first found trying to pull the levers of neocolonialism and oil the gears of corporatism, I was scared. I was scared not only for my personal safety; I was scared for the people I love. And now that Taj/Stephen/JT is planning to take over society's eyes, ears, mind, and spirit, I'm downright terrified. The largest problem, however, is that we wouldn't have a problem with obstructionism if it weren't for Taj/Stephen/JT. Although he created the problem, aggravated the problem, and escalated the problem, Taj/Stephen/JT insists that he can solve the problem if we just grant him more power. How naïve does he think we are? Truly, Taj/Stephen/JT's scurrilous ideologies induce paralysis of the cerebrum. Let me try to explain what I mean by that in a single sentence: Taj/Stephen/JT likes to cite poll results that "prove" that it is better that a hundred thousand people should perish than that he should be even slightly inconvenienced. Really? Have you ever been contacted by one of his pollsters? Chances are good that you never have been contacted and never will be. Otherwise, the polls would show that if I withheld my feelings on this matter, I'd be no less avaricious than Taj/Stephen/JT. Taj/Stephen/JT's planning to exploit issues such as the global economic crisis and the increase in world terrorism in order to instigate planet-wide chaos. Planet-wide chaos is his gateway to global tyranny, which will in turn enable him to instill a general ennui. Thoughtful people are being forced to admit, after years of evading the truth, that I have been right. I was right when I said that Taj/Stephen/JT's cajoleries, though creative, are a yawning abyss of nihilism. I was right when I said that Taj/Stephen/JT has done inestimable damage to everything around him. And I was right when I said that we were put on this planet to be active, to struggle, and to exert a positive influence on the type of world that people will live in a thousand years from now. We were not put here to supplant national heroes with spineless gauleiters, as Taj/Stephen/JT might feel. Taj/Stephen/JT not only lies but he brags about his lying to his confreres. The next time he decides to arrest and detain his enemies indefinitely without
charge, without trial, and without access to legal counsel, he should think to himself, cui bono?-who benefits? Mankind needs to do more to present a
noble vision of who we were, who we are, and who we can potentially be. Understand, I am not condemning mankind for not doing enough; I am merely stating that
Taj/Stephen/JT can't attack my ideas, so he attacks me. It could be worse, I suppose. He could lower this country's moral tone and depreciate its
commercial integrity. Okay, I've written enough for one letter, so let me just finish by saying that Taj/Stephen/JT's head is so far in rectal defilade
it would require major surgery to extricate it.
Before you declare me effrontive, let me assert that it has been said that the similarities between Taj/Stephen/JT and drugged-out blockheads should not be taken lightly. I believe that to be true. I also believe that he contends that cannibalism, wife-swapping, and the murder of infants and the elderly are acceptable behavior. Excuse me, but where exactly did this little factoid come from? Do you ever get the feeling that his claims will surely lead to decay, to dissolution, to chaos, and to ruin? Well, you should because he is secretly planning to supply the chains that bind the individual to notions of self-loathing and unworthiness. I realize that that may sound rather conspiratorial and farfetched to most people, which is why you need to understand that Taj/Stephen/JT hates you-yes, you, because you, like me, want to stand uncompromised in a world that's on the brink of Taj/Stephen/JT-induced disaster. Taj/Stephen/JT is crazier than a road lizard. Which brings us to the harsh reality that must be faced: I'm willing to accept that I went puce with rage when I first heard Taj/Stephen/JT say that his causeries are a breath of fresh air amid our modern culture's toxic cloud of chaos. I'm even willing to accept that his proposed social programs are uniformly riddled by an unbelievable degree of ignorance. But I have one itsy-bitsy problem with his cop-outs. Videlicet, they produce culturally degenerate films and tapes. And that's saying nothing about how I recently received some mail in which the writer stated, "My contempt for Taj/Stephen/JT is boundless." I included that quote not because it is exceptional in any way, but rather because it is typical of much of the mail I receive. I included it to show you that I'm not the only one who thinks that my goal is to get Taj/Stephen/JT to realize that he turns to medieval legends of poisoned wells in order to frighten insolent, saturnine crackpots into forcing me to serve as a human shield for his bombardments. Of course, if he insists on remaining an ignorant, uninformed, and ill-informed despot, that's his prerogative. Taj/Stephen/JT wants nothing less than to impede the free flow of information, hence his repeated, almost hypnotic, insistence on the importance of his ignominious smears. He wants us to emulate the White Queen from Lewis Carroll's Through the Looking Glass, who strives to believe "as many as six impossible things before breakfast". Then again, even the White Queen would have trouble believing that children should belong to the state. I prefer to believe things that my experience tells me are true, such as that an armed revolt against Taj/Stephen/JT is morally justified. However, I think that it is not yet strategically justified. Is there anyone else out there who's noticed that his slaves must be exposed and neutralized wherever they lurk? I ask because some day, in the far, far future, he will realize that none of what he says carries any weight. This realization will sink in slowly but surely and will be accompanied by a comprehension of how there is a problem here. A very large, footling, lethargic problem. Here's the heart of the matter: Taj/Stephen/JT is doing everything in his power to make me expend all of my wit and energy in trivial pursuits. The only reason I haven't yet is that I believe in the four P's: patience, prayer, positive thinking, and perseverance. It's not just that part of the myth that Taj/Stephen/JT perpetuates is that he can change his pusillanimous ways but also that I correctly predicted that he would provide logorrheic spongers with a milieu in which they can focus too much on one side of the equation and not enough on the broader perspective of things. Alas, I didn't think he'd do that so effectively-or so soon. This is what Taj/Stephen/JT's followers try to prevent us from hearing about on radio and television or reading about in popular magazines and large-circulation papers, but that's really beside the point. Some would say that this is a platitude. Would that it were! Rather, Taj/Stephen/JT likes saying that misinformed freeloaders and intolerant, pathological barbarians should rule this country. Okay, that's a parody-but not a very gross one. In point of fact, Taj/Stephen/JT has recently been going around claiming that the Queen of England heads up the international drug cartel. You really have to tie your brain in knots to be gullible enough to believe that junk. I would fain expose the connections between the gruesome problems that face us and the key issues of autism and nonrepresentationalism but I'm a bit worried that Taj/Stephen/JT will retaliate by causing riots in the streets. I'm worried because if you're the type who dares to think for yourself, then you've probably already determined that his adulators believe that he is as innocent as a newborn lamb. It should not be surprising that they believe this, however. As we all know, minds that have been so maimed that they believe that people don't mind having their communities turned into war zones can believe anything, especially if it's false. When he was first found trying to pull the levers of neocolonialism and oil the gears of corporatism, I was scared. I was scared not only for my personal safety; I was scared for the people I love. And now that Taj/Stephen/JT is planning to take over society's eyes, ears, mind, and spirit, I'm downright terrified. The largest problem, however, is that we wouldn't have a problem with obstructionism if it weren't for Taj/Stephen/JT. Although he created the problem, aggravated the problem, and escalated the problem, Taj/Stephen/JT insists that he can solve the problem if we just grant him more power. How naïve does he think we are? Truly, Taj/Stephen/JT's scurrilous ideologies induce paralysis of the cerebrum. Let me try to explain what I mean by that in a single sentence: Taj/Stephen/JT likes to cite poll results that "prove" that it is better that a hundred thousand people should perish than that he should be even slightly inconvenienced. Really? Have you ever been contacted by one of his pollsters? Chances are good that you never have been contacted and never will be. Otherwise, the polls would show that if I withheld my feelings on this matter, I'd be no less avaricious than Taj/Stephen/JT. Taj/Stephen/JT's planning to exploit issues such as the global economic crisis and the increase in world terrorism in order to instigate planet-wide chaos. Planet-wide chaos is his gateway to global tyranny, which will in turn enable him to instill a general ennui. Thoughtful people are being forced to admit, after years of evading the truth, that I have been right. I was right when I said that Taj/Stephen/JT's cajoleries, though creative, are a yawning abyss of nihilism. I was right when I said that Taj/Stephen/JT has done inestimable damage to everything around him. And I was right when I said that we were put on this planet to be active, to struggle, and to exert a positive influence on the type of world that people will live in a thousand years from now. We were not put here to supplant national heroes with spineless gauleiters, as Taj/Stephen/JT might feel. Taj/Stephen/JT not only lies but he brags about his lying to his confreres. The next time he decides to arrest and detain his enemies indefinitely without
charge, without trial, and without access to legal counsel, he should think to himself, cui bono?-who benefits? Mankind needs to do more to present a
noble vision of who we were, who we are, and who we can potentially be. Understand, I am not condemning mankind for not doing enough; I am merely stating that
Taj/Stephen/JT can't attack my ideas, so he attacks me. It could be worse, I suppose. He could lower this country's moral tone and depreciate its
commercial integrity. Okay, I've written enough for one letter, so let me just finish by saying that Taj/Stephen/JT's head is so far in rectal defilade
it would require major surgery to extricate it.
Before you declare me effrontive, let me assert that it has been said that the similarities between Taj/Stephen/JT and drugged-out blockheads should not be taken lightly. I believe that to be true. I also believe that he contends that cannibalism, wife-swapping, and the murder of infants and the elderly are acceptable behavior. Excuse me, but where exactly did this little factoid come from? Do you ever get the feeling that his claims will surely lead to decay, to dissolution, to chaos, and to ruin? Well, you should because he is secretly planning to supply the chains that bind the individual to notions of self-loathing and unworthiness. I realize that that may sound rather conspiratorial and farfetched to most people, which is why you need to understand that Taj/Stephen/JT hates you-yes, you, because you, like me, want to stand uncompromised in a world that's on the brink of Taj/Stephen/JT-induced disaster. Taj/Stephen/JT is crazier than a road lizard. Which brings us to the harsh reality that must be faced: I'm willing to accept that I went puce with rage when I first heard Taj/Stephen/JT say that his causeries are a breath of fresh air amid our modern culture's toxic cloud of chaos. I'm even willing to accept that his proposed social programs are uniformly riddled by an unbelievable degree of ignorance. But I have one itsy-bitsy problem with his cop-outs. Videlicet, they produce culturally degenerate films and tapes. And that's saying nothing about how I recently received some mail in which the writer stated, "My contempt for Taj/Stephen/JT is boundless." I included that quote not because it is exceptional in any way, but rather because it is typical of much of the mail I receive. I included it to show you that I'm not the only one who thinks that my goal is to get Taj/Stephen/JT to realize that he turns to medieval legends of poisoned wells in order to frighten insolent, saturnine crackpots into forcing me to serve as a human shield for his bombardments. Of course, if he insists on remaining an ignorant, uninformed, and ill-informed despot, that's his prerogative. Taj/Stephen/JT wants nothing less than to impede the free flow of information, hence his repeated, almost hypnotic, insistence on the importance of his ignominious smears. He wants us to emulate the White Queen from Lewis Carroll's Through the Looking Glass, who strives to believe "as many as six impossible things before breakfast". Then again, even the White Queen would have trouble believing that children should belong to the state. I prefer to believe things that my experience tells me are true, such as that an armed revolt against Taj/Stephen/JT is morally justified. However, I think that it is not yet strategically justified. Is there anyone else out there who's noticed that his slaves must be exposed and neutralized wherever they lurk? I ask because some day, in the far, far future, he will realize that none of what he says carries any weight. This realization will sink in slowly but surely and will be accompanied by a comprehension of how there is a problem here. A very large, footling, lethargic problem. Here's the heart of the matter: Taj/Stephen/JT is doing everything in his power to make me expend all of my wit and energy in trivial pursuits. The only reason I haven't yet is that I believe in the four P's: patience, prayer, positive thinking, and perseverance. It's not just that part of the myth that Taj/Stephen/JT perpetuates is that he can change his pusillanimous ways but also that I correctly predicted that he would provide logorrheic spongers with a milieu in which they can focus too much on one side of the equation and not enough on the broader perspective of things. Alas, I didn't think he'd do that so effectively-or so soon. This is what Taj/Stephen/JT's followers try to prevent us from hearing about on radio and television or reading about in popular magazines and large-circulation papers, but that's really beside the point. Some would say that this is a platitude. Would that it were! Rather, Taj/Stephen/JT likes saying that misinformed freeloaders and intolerant, pathological barbarians should rule this country. Okay, that's a parody-but not a very gross one. In point of fact, Taj/Stephen/JT has recently been going around claiming that the Queen of England heads up the international drug cartel. You really have to tie your brain in knots to be gullible enough to believe that junk. I would fain expose the connections between the gruesome problems that face us and the key issues of autism and nonrepresentationalism but I'm a bit worried that Taj/Stephen/JT will retaliate by causing riots in the streets. I'm worried because if you're the type who dares to think for yourself, then you've probably already determined that his adulators believe that he is as innocent as a newborn lamb. It should not be surprising that they believe this, however. As we all know, minds that have been so maimed that they believe that people don't mind having their communities turned into war zones can believe anything, especially if it's false. When he was first found trying to pull the levers of neocolonialism and oil the gears of corporatism, I was scared. I was scared not only for my personal safety; I was scared for the people I love. And now that Taj/Stephen/JT is planning to take over society's eyes, ears, mind, and spirit, I'm downright terrified. The largest problem, however, is that we wouldn't have a problem with obstructionism if it weren't for Taj/Stephen/JT. Although he created the problem, aggravated the problem, and escalated the problem, Taj/Stephen/JT insists that he can solve the problem if we just grant him more power. How naïve does he think we are? Truly, Taj/Stephen/JT's scurrilous ideologies induce paralysis of the cerebrum. Let me try to explain what I mean by that in a single sentence: Taj/Stephen/JT likes to cite poll results that "prove" that it is better that a hundred thousand people should perish than that he should be even slightly inconvenienced. Really? Have you ever been contacted by one of his pollsters? Chances are good that you never have been contacted and never will be. Otherwise, the polls would show that if I withheld my feelings on this matter, I'd be no less avaricious than Taj/Stephen/JT. Taj/Stephen/JT's planning to exploit issues such as the global economic crisis and the increase in world terrorism in order to instigate planet-wide chaos. Planet-wide chaos is his gateway to global tyranny, which will in turn enable him to instill a general ennui. Thoughtful people are being forced to admit, after years of evading the truth, that I have been right. I was right when I said that Taj/Stephen/JT's cajoleries, though creative, are a yawning abyss of nihilism. I was right when I said that Taj/Stephen/JT has done inestimable damage to everything around him. And I was right when I said that we were put on this planet to be active, to struggle, and to exert a positive influence on the type of world that people will live in a thousand years from now. We were not put here to supplant national heroes with spineless gauleiters, as Taj/Stephen/JT might feel. Taj/Stephen/JT not only lies but he brags about his lying to his confreres. The next time he decides to arrest and detain his enemies indefinitely without
charge, without trial, and without access to legal counsel, he should think to himself, cui bono?-who benefits? Mankind needs to do more to present a
noble vision of who we were, who we are, and who we can potentially be. Understand, I am not condemning mankind for not doing enough; I am merely stating that
Taj/Stephen/JT can't attack my ideas, so he attacks me. It could be worse, I suppose. He could lower this country's moral tone and depreciate its
commercial integrity. Okay, I've written enough for one letter, so let me just finish by saying that Taj/Stephen/JT's head is so far in rectal defilade
it would require major surgery to extricate it.
Before you declare me effrontive, let me assert that it has been said that the similarities between Taj/Stephen/JT and drugged-out blockheads should not be taken lightly. I believe that to be true. I also believe that he contends that cannibalism, wife-swapping, and the murder of infants and the elderly are acceptable behavior. Excuse me, but where exactly did this little factoid come from? Do you ever get the feeling that his claims will surely lead to decay, to dissolution, to chaos, and to ruin? Well, you should because he is secretly planning to supply the chains that bind the individual to notions of self-loathing and unworthiness. I realize that that may sound rather conspiratorial and farfetched to most people, which is why you need to understand that Taj/Stephen/JT hates you-yes, you, because you, like me, want to stand uncompromised in a world that's on the brink of Taj/Stephen/JT-induced disaster. Taj/Stephen/JT is crazier than a road lizard. Which brings us to the harsh reality that must be faced: I'm willing to accept that I went puce with rage when I first heard Taj/Stephen/JT say that his causeries are a breath of fresh air amid our modern culture's toxic cloud of chaos. I'm even willing to accept that his proposed social programs are uniformly riddled by an unbelievable degree of ignorance. But I have one itsy-bitsy problem with his cop-outs. Videlicet, they produce culturally degenerate films and tapes. And that's saying nothing about how I recently received some mail in which the writer stated, "My contempt for Taj/Stephen/JT is boundless." I included that quote not because it is exceptional in any way, but rather because it is typical of much of the mail I receive. I included it to show you that I'm not the only one who thinks that my goal is to get Taj/Stephen/JT to realize that he turns to medieval legends of poisoned wells in order to frighten insolent, saturnine crackpots into forcing me to serve as a human shield for his bombardments. Of course, if he insists on remaining an ignorant, uninformed, and ill-informed despot, that's his prerogative. Taj/Stephen/JT wants nothing less than to impede the free flow of information, hence his repeated, almost hypnotic, insistence on the importance of his ignominious smears. He wants us to emulate the White Queen from Lewis Carroll's Through the Looking Glass, who strives to believe "as many as six impossible things before breakfast". Then again, even the White Queen would have trouble believing that children should belong to the state. I prefer to believe things that my experience tells me are true, such as that an armed revolt against Taj/Stephen/JT is morally justified. However, I think that it is not yet strategically justified. Is there anyone else out there who's noticed that his slaves must be exposed and neutralized wherever they lurk? I ask because some day, in the far, far future, he will realize that none of what he says carries any weight. This realization will sink in slowly but surely and will be accompanied by a comprehension of how there is a problem here. A very large, footling, lethargic problem. Here's the heart of the matter: Taj/Stephen/JT is doing everything in his power to make me expend all of my wit and energy in trivial pursuits. The only reason I haven't yet is that I believe in the four P's: patience, prayer, positive thinking, and perseverance. It's not just that part of the myth that Taj/Stephen/JT perpetuates is that he can change his pusillanimous ways but also that I correctly predicted that he would provide logorrheic spongers with a milieu in which they can focus too much on one side of the equation and not enough on the broader perspective of things. Alas, I didn't think he'd do that so effectively-or so soon. This is what Taj/Stephen/JT's followers try to prevent us from hearing about on radio and television or reading about in popular magazines and large-circulation papers, but that's really beside the point. Some would say that this is a platitude. Would that it were! Rather, Taj/Stephen/JT likes saying that misinformed freeloaders and intolerant, pathological barbarians should rule this country. Okay, that's a parody-but not a very gross one. In point of fact, Taj/Stephen/JT has recently been going around claiming that the Queen of England heads up the international drug cartel. You really have to tie your brain in knots to be gullible enough to believe that junk. I would fain expose the connections between the gruesome problems that face us and the key issues of autism and nonrepresentationalism but I'm a bit worried that Taj/Stephen/JT will retaliate by causing riots in the streets. I'm worried because if you're the type who dares to think for yourself, then you've probably already determined that his adulators believe that he is as innocent as a newborn lamb. It should not be surprising that they believe this, however. As we all know, minds that have been so maimed that they believe that people don't mind having their communities turned into war zones can believe anything, especially if it's false. When he was first found trying to pull the levers of neocolonialism and oil the gears of corporatism, I was scared. I was scared not only for my personal safety; I was scared for the people I love. And now that Taj/Stephen/JT is planning to take over society's eyes, ears, mind, and spirit, I'm downright terrified. The largest problem, however, is that we wouldn't have a problem with obstructionism if it weren't for Taj/Stephen/JT. Although he created the problem, aggravated the problem, and escalated the problem, Taj/Stephen/JT insists that he can solve the problem if we just grant him more power. How naïve does he think we are? Truly, Taj/Stephen/JT's scurrilous ideologies induce paralysis of the cerebrum. Let me try to explain what I mean by that in a single sentence: Taj/Stephen/JT likes to cite poll results that "prove" that it is better that a hundred thousand people should perish than that he should be even slightly inconvenienced. Really? Have you ever been contacted by one of his pollsters? Chances are good that you never have been contacted and never will be. Otherwise, the polls would show that if I withheld my feelings on this matter, I'd be no less avaricious than Taj/Stephen/JT. Taj/Stephen/JT's planning to exploit issues such as the global economic crisis and the increase in world terrorism in order to instigate planet-wide chaos. Planet-wide chaos is his gateway to global tyranny, which will in turn enable him to instill a general ennui. Thoughtful people are being forced to admit, after years of evading the truth, that I have been right. I was right when I said that Taj/Stephen/JT's cajoleries, though creative, are a yawning abyss of nihilism. I was right when I said that Taj/Stephen/JT has done inestimable damage to everything around him. And I was right when I said that we were put on this planet to be active, to struggle, and to exert a positive influence on the type of world that people will live in a thousand years from now. We were not put here to supplant national heroes with spineless gauleiters, as Taj/Stephen/JT might feel. Taj/Stephen/JT not only lies but he brags about his lying to his confreres. The next time he decides to arrest and detain his enemies indefinitely without
charge, without trial, and without access to legal counsel, he should think to himself, cui bono?-who benefits? Mankind needs to do more to present a
noble vision of who we were, who we are, and who we can potentially be. Understand, I am not condemning mankind for not doing enough; I am merely stating that
Taj/Stephen/JT can't attack my ideas, so he attacks me. It could be worse, I suppose. He could lower this country's moral tone and depreciate its
commercial integrity. Okay, I've written enough for one letter, so let me just finish by saying that Taj/Stephen/JT's head is so far in rectal defilade
it would require major surgery to extricate it.
Before you declare me effrontive, let me assert that it has been said that the similarities between Taj/Stephen/JT and drugged-out blockheads should not be taken lightly. I believe that to be true. I also believe that he contends that cannibalism, wife-swapping, and the murder of infants and the elderly are acceptable behavior. Excuse me, but where exactly did this little factoid come from? Do you ever get the feeling that his claims will surely lead to decay, to dissolution, to chaos, and to ruin? Well, you should because he is secretly planning to supply the chains that bind the individual to notions of self-loathing and unworthiness. I realize that that may sound rather conspiratorial and farfetched to most people, which is why you need to understand that Taj/Stephen/JT hates you-yes, you, because you, like me, want to stand uncompromised in a world that's on the brink of Taj/Stephen/JT-induced disaster. Taj/Stephen/JT is crazier than a road lizard. Which brings us to the harsh reality that must be faced: I'm willing to accept that I went puce with rage when I first heard Taj/Stephen/JT say that his causeries are a breath of fresh air amid our modern culture's toxic cloud of chaos. I'm even willing to accept that his proposed social programs are uniformly riddled by an unbelievable degree of ignorance. But I have one itsy-bitsy problem with his cop-outs. Videlicet, they produce culturally degenerate films and tapes. And that's saying nothing about how I recently received some mail in which the writer stated, "My contempt for Taj/Stephen/JT is boundless." I included that quote not because it is exceptional in any way, but rather because it is typical of much of the mail I receive. I included it to show you that I'm not the only one who thinks that my goal is to get Taj/Stephen/JT to realize that he turns to medieval legends of poisoned wells in order to frighten insolent, saturnine crackpots into forcing me to serve as a human shield for his bombardments. Of course, if he insists on remaining an ignorant, uninformed, and ill-informed despot, that's his prerogative. Taj/Stephen/JT wants nothing less than to impede the free flow of information, hence his repeated, almost hypnotic, insistence on the importance of his ignominious smears. He wants us to emulate the White Queen from Lewis Carroll's Through the Looking Glass, who strives to believe "as many as six impossible things before breakfast". Then again, even the White Queen would have trouble believing that children should belong to the state. I prefer to believe things that my experience tells me are true, such as that an armed revolt against Taj/Stephen/JT is morally justified. However, I think that it is not yet strategically justified. Is there anyone else out there who's noticed that his slaves must be exposed and neutralized wherever they lurk? I ask because some day, in the far, far future, he will realize that none of what he says carries any weight. This realization will sink in slowly but surely and will be accompanied by a comprehension of how there is a problem here. A very large, footling, lethargic problem. Here's the heart of the matter: Taj/Stephen/JT is doing everything in his power to make me expend all of my wit and energy in trivial pursuits. The only reason I haven't yet is that I believe in the four P's: patience, prayer, positive thinking, and perseverance. It's not just that part of the myth that Taj/Stephen/JT perpetuates is that he can change his pusillanimous ways but also that I correctly predicted that he would provide logorrheic spongers with a milieu in which they can focus too much on one side of the equation and not enough on the broader perspective of things. Alas, I didn't think he'd do that so effectively-or so soon. This is what Taj/Stephen/JT's followers try to prevent us from hearing about on radio and television or reading about in popular magazines and large-circulation papers, but that's really beside the point. Some would say that this is a platitude. Would that it were! Rather, Taj/Stephen/JT likes saying that misinformed freeloaders and intolerant, pathological barbarians should rule this country. Okay, that's a parody-but not a very gross one. In point of fact, Taj/Stephen/JT has recently been going around claiming that the Queen of England heads up the international drug cartel. You really have to tie your brain in knots to be gullible enough to believe that junk. I would fain expose the connections between the gruesome problems that face us and the key issues of autism and nonrepresentationalism but I'm a bit worried that Taj/Stephen/JT will retaliate by causing riots in the streets. I'm worried because if you're the type who dares to think for yourself, then you've probably already determined that his adulators believe that he is as innocent as a newborn lamb. It should not be surprising that they believe this, however. As we all know, minds that have been so maimed that they believe that people don't mind having their communities turned into war zones can believe anything, especially if it's false. When he was first found trying to pull the levers of neocolonialism and oil the gears of corporatism, I was scared. I was scared not only for my personal safety; I was scared for the people I love. And now that Taj/Stephen/JT is planning to take over society's eyes, ears, mind, and spirit, I'm downright terrified. The largest problem, however, is that we wouldn't have a problem with obstructionism if it weren't for Taj/Stephen/JT. Although he created the problem, aggravated the problem, and escalated the problem, Taj/Stephen/JT insists that he can solve the problem if we just grant him more power. How naïve does he think we are? Truly, Taj/Stephen/JT's scurrilous ideologies induce paralysis of the cerebrum. Let me try to explain what I mean by that in a single sentence: Taj/Stephen/JT likes to cite poll results that "prove" that it is better that a hundred thousand people should perish than that he should be even slightly inconvenienced. Really? Have you ever been contacted by one of his pollsters? Chances are good that you never have been contacted and never will be. Otherwise, the polls would show that if I withheld my feelings on this matter, I'd be no less avaricious than Taj/Stephen/JT. Taj/Stephen/JT's planning to exploit issues such as the global economic crisis and the increase in world terrorism in order to instigate planet-wide chaos. Planet-wide chaos is his gateway to global tyranny, which will in turn enable him to instill a general ennui. Thoughtful people are being forced to admit, after years of evading the truth, that I have been right. I was right when I said that Taj/Stephen/JT's cajoleries, though creative, are a yawning abyss of nihilism. I was right when I said that Taj/Stephen/JT has done inestimable damage to everything around him. And I was right when I said that we were put on this planet to be active, to struggle, and to exert a positive influence on the type of world that people will live in a thousand years from now. We were not put here to supplant national heroes with spineless gauleiters, as Taj/Stephen/JT might feel. Taj/Stephen/JT not only lies but he brags about his lying to his confreres. The next time he decides to arrest and detain his enemies indefinitely without
charge, without trial, and without access to legal counsel, he should think to himself, cui bono?-who benefits? Mankind needs to do more to present a
noble vision of who we were, who we are, and who we can potentially be. Understand, I am not condemning mankind for not doing enough; I am merely stating that
Taj/Stephen/JT can't attack my ideas, so he attacks me. It could be worse, I suppose. He could lower this country's moral tone and depreciate its
commercial integrity. Okay, I've written enough for one letter, so let me just finish by saying that Taj/Stephen/JT's head is so far in rectal defilade
it would require major surgery to extricate it.
|
||
|
robbiefan |
|||
|
Posts: 2897 (04/18/09 11:08 AM) Registered user |
OMG! My brain hurts.
I can see why they voted out Brendan, afterall Tyson is safe and coach is not a physical threat and an easy goat to take to the final. |
||
|
apparition |
|||
|
Posts: 21 (04/18/09 11:20 AM) |
As a new poster to Sucks, am I required to read all of this? Is there going to be a quiz?
|
||
|
it is a mystery |
|||
|
Posts: 1962 (04/18/09 12:08 PM) |
Yes. Read it all.
Twice. |
||
