Is it better for actresses to age naturally? in Off Topic Forum

0 Points

Is it better for actresses to age naturally?

Started By	Comment
Zzunk		#101	[-]
Posts: 6031 (08/24/09 08:37 PM) Registered User Reply Quote More Recent Posts	Wonderful World Remove this ad Cicely Tyson 1967 (Age 34) 1974 (Age 110) On left -- 2009 (Age 76)
ishavedmyhairypotter		#102	[-]
Posts: 957 (08/25/09 07:17 AM) Registered User Reply Quote More Recent Posts	Charming Nemesis wrote: Michelle Pfeiffer is a phenomenon. Saw her on Letterman a few months back and there was no botox. She had expression and could move her forehead. Her hands and neck look youthful. She's amazing for her or any age. That doesnt mean much, though. I've had botox and if you have a good doctor, you can still make facial expressions. I had it done for a crease between my eyes, but i can still raise my eyebrows and look angry, surprised, happy...I also had it done for crows feet, but just a teeny bit - I wanted to still be able to make them wrinkle if i want. Still, Michelle Pfeiffer is a phenomenon. Even with a little botox, her beauty comes mostly from her natural looks. I'm surprised nobodys mentioned Demi Moore. There's a lady who's had a lot of work done, proving once again plastic surgery can look alright so long as you don't go to Joan Rivers' doc.
SmrtAss		#103	[-]
Posts: 7658 (09/02/09 10:02 AM) Lazy ass bitch, please Reply Quote More Recent Posts	Julia Ormond is only 43?