| Started By | Comment | ||
|---|---|---|---|
Satchmo |
|||
|
I doubt the final 3 will be in the house. They have to take the 3rd person out of the house to meet up with other Jury members and set up the Q&A/Bitch
session at the Faux Jury house (complete with tiki torches). All the set up and editing that needs to happen means that odd person out will be sent packing
before the finale night.
|
|||
willsucks402 |
|||
|
I dont like this shit! Would they even have Jury questions even if they did they would have to tell the final 2 to keep it brief since it is live
|
|||
The SovereignOne |
|||
|
I commend the show for trying something different, BUT...
BB Finales are set-up very well. The only problem I think anyone has ever had with them is that they are not long enough! So this year, they give us our 2 hours but go and change the format! We'll see how it plays out. |
|||
gatorgal |
|||
|
Yea this is simply a reaction to the very likely possiblility of Kevin/Nat in the finals which loses people's interests so they are going to milk the who
will be final 2? as long as they can. I would love for Jordan to win but she honestly doesn't deserve it .... I do hope she takes second to Kevin though.
I'll be mad if the 3rd person evicted (unless its Natalie) doesn't get to vote ... and if they do the jury questions live. With the way Natalie rambles, that woul be a disaster. |
|||
James Barber |
|||
|
I just wonder if it is worth all this just for Jordan? Don't they know that if Natalie is F2 this may make it even more likely she will win, since no one
will have time to tell Jordan of Natalie's lies? And will the jury questioning, which is usually one of the best parts of the finale, be completely gutted
because of this gimmick?
If this is just to brainwash Natalie or Kevin into taking Jordan and one of the favorites winning, I don't think stepping all over the finale is worth it. If the finale is an ugly mess, then no one will care who wins, even if it is one of the sainted side. |
|||
bergdogg469 |
|||
|
My theory is that they will do jury questions with all three remaining houseguests. It would make sense, and it might be BB's last shot to convince Kevin
that he shouldn't take Natalie.
|
|||
James Barber |
|||
|
That's a good point. I kind of wonder if it might make him more sure of taking her, if the jury roasts her. I guess BB could tell the jury to be more
negative to Jordan, even if they plan to vote for her, so they can try to manipulate Kevin or Natalie to taking Jordan if she doesn't win the last HOH.
|
|||
IReallyHaveNoIdea |
|||
willsucks402 wrote: That will suck if the Jury questioning is live on the funally. Listening to the F2 melt down after getting grilled is about the only entertaining thing to look forward to on the feeds at this point in the season. |
|||
Bubba4life |
|||
|
I think final two should be allowed to have a brief viewing of jury house to get the idea.
|
|||
bobo1759 |
|||
|
HUH? What's going on? I thought that Grodner already said that America will be the final vote. Won't they have to make the final 2 well known with
plenty of time for people to vote? I would also think that Grodner would like to milk some time in the finale with J/J reunited in the jury house.
|
|||
willsucks402 |
|||
bobo1759 wrote: Well in season 8 they had an AP vote during the live show. So maybe they wont reveal the winner until the end of the show |
|||
bobo1759 |
|||
willsucks402 wrote:I don't remember that, but for a vote that decides the winner I can't see them doing that. It would exclude the west coast viewers completely. |
|||
penguin |
|||
|
^^^ i was wondering about this...and if they just let you vote for all three and only count the f2 votes that will be bullshit since someone won't be there
and their supporters could have voted for someone else. fucking shit...just do it how it's always done. it's not like it's more interesting
watching one more of the assholes.
|
|||
agent2424 |
|||
|
Posts: 4575 (09/09/09 10:51 PM) Registered user |
i just want a fucking reunion show... is that too hard to ask... where everyone get's to talk.... not just Ronnie
|
||
bobo1759 |
|||
|
I think people are reading too much into that article. Grodner wouldn't answer the questions because she wants entice people to watch the show to find out
what happens.
|
|||
penguin |
|||
|
i just figure they won't have time to do two comps, talk to ed, jp, mb, & dr, visit the jury house,and have the eviction all tomorrow. the only thing
that makes that article not true would be the eviction on sunday night instead of a fucking recap. which would be ok.
agent , i agree with you about the reunion. |
|||
Keyer2x |
|||
|
I think there will be the 3 of them in the house on finale night. However, I think the F3 eviction will take place over the weekend and it will air on the
finale. I noticed Julie said Part 2 of the HoH is Thursday night, no mention of the eviction at all, which is usually hyped.
|
|||
coolboy66 |
|||
|
technically, one of them will be a black olive with a spritz of olive oil. so only two houseguests plus the black olive will be in the house.
|
|||
willsucks402 |
|||
|
Well Kevin said two comps tomorrow and everyone has to pack...take that for what you will
|
|||
anders332 |
|||
Keyer2x wrote: I'm beginning to wonder if Part 3 and F3 eviction will both take place live on Sunday, it would be easy enough to keep F3 out of jury (if thats' what the goal of this new set up is) until Tuesday, have it set up so when F3 comes in, it's straight to round table Q&As, speeches. Don't they usually get separated at some point after this and before live show? this would allow 2 days for fan voting - IDK - I'm just trying to figure it out like everyone else. |
|||