OMG!!! It's over!!! in Big Brother Forum

0 Points

OMG!!! It's over!!!

Started By	Comment
crackbaby		#3621	[-]
Posts: 788 (09/29/09 10:35 PM) More Recent Posts	Constant change is here to stay. Remove this ad someone should ask russell about his hoh blog he wrote about michele being the rat since he claims his fights with michele were gameplay russell really thinks he had like the best bame play ever and @him thinking his fight with jordan was a big success all the fight did was make them all look like idiots but jordan chestbumping russell was like one of the best moments of the season
Razor Toast		#3622	[-]
Posts: 490 (09/29/09 10:57 PM) More Recent Posts	Another thing I got from that Blog Talk Radio interview was how Russ said his main goal was winning the game. Well, D'OH. However, he sounded like he'd never had that talk with Chima up in his HOH saying, "Can you act real good? Because I can act. We need to have a huge fight when Showtime comes on. Yeah yeah, throw water on me, that'll be good..." and other crap. The manbitch sounds torn about saying he wanted to get big ups for his acting skills and/or winning skills. Then since he sucked at both all he can now do is bash the winner and Jeff for being themselves and for, haha, WINNING.
Go F Yourself		#3623	[-]
Posts: 8 (09/29/09 10:59 PM) More Recent Posts	Oh, you didn't hear, Russ was cast to play the villain. He was in character 24/7. He took the best gameplay elements from Will, Boogie, Evel Dick, and Dan and came in 6th place. He's a collosal douchebag. Remember him taking credit for snuffing out that Ronnie was the Rat (ahem, it was Laura). Later in an interview, he says his most enjoyable moment was bullying Ronnie (really? you mean the fake bullying after you snuck up to his HOH and made a deal with him). He also never took things personal (ahem the Chima fight, complaining all day to Jeff, Jordan, and Michele in the backyard; getting pissed at Kevin for laughing at the Terrorist comments; and pouting to dad that he had failed him the night before the Coup was used). Russ was definitely the best player to come out of Season 11.
Go F Yourself		#3624	[-]
Posts: 9 (09/29/09 11:03 PM) More Recent Posts	Razor Toast wrote: The manbitch sounds torn about saying he wanted to get big ups for his acting skills and/or winning skills. Then since he sucked at both all he can now do is bash the winner and Jeff for being themselves and for, haha, WINNING. Well he tried to get props for his awesome gameplay from Evel Dick during his backyard interview. He sucked ED off real good. He got a mouth full of jizz but no props. Poor Russ.
AllieBuck		#3625	[-]
Posts: 218 (09/29/09 11:12 PM) More Recent Posts	The problem I have with Russ and Michele is that even though they were loyal to the final 4 alliance, their behavior throughout the game and just general personalities made them look shady as shit. That doesn't take away from the fact that Jeff and Jordan were idiots from turning on them a week too early. But in the post finale interviews I am not sure I have heard them acknowledge this. I didn't listen to the interview the other night so I guess I am wondering if they owned up to the mistakes they made... like Michele with her awkwardness/inability to communicate/bipolar behavior and Russell's general idiotic gameplay.
Fluffynurse		#3626	[-]
Posts: 16788 (09/29/09 11:16 PM) Registered User More Recent Posts	The one effective thing he did in a mean way was when he caught onto Ronnie being a rat like the first week the feeds came on. He cornered Ronnie in the storage room asking him personal questions like really being a teacher. Ronnie was visibly frightened. He went to the back side of the DR table & sat alone. Russell puffed up his chest & started circling the table closely moving ever nearer to Ronnie. He just stared at Ron menacingly as he circled & asked him more questions about his teaching job. Ronnie's face looked like he needed to go shit. And you could tell Russ was getting to him. That was the moment Ronnie started pushing the backdoor Russell campaign hard.
Fluffynurse		#3627	[-]
Posts: 16789 (09/29/09 11:18 PM) Registered User More Recent Posts	Oh & Russell's blog where he wrote that Nat was an angel. I wonder if he wishes he could go back & change that.
Razor Toast		#3628	[-]
Posts: 492 (09/29/09 11:19 PM) More Recent Posts	Go F Yourself wrote: Oh, you didn't hear, Russ was cast to play the villain. He was in character 24/7. He took the best gameplay elements from Will, Boogie, Evel Dick, and Dan and came in 6th place. He's a collosal douchebag. Remember him taking credit for snuffing out that Ronnie was the Rat (ahem, it was Laura). Later in an interview, he says his most enjoyable moment was bullying Ronnie (really? you mean the fake bullying after you snuck up to his HOH and made a deal with him). He also never took things personal (ahem the Chima fight, complaining all day to Jeff, Jordan, and Michele in the backyard; getting pissed at Kevin for laughing at the Terrorist comments; and pouting to dad that he had failed him the night before the Coup was used). Russ was definitely the best player to come out of Season 11. Collosal douchebag, for sure. Remember him taking credit for snuffing out Laura's initial sniff and then later switcherooing it all on Michele (of whom he now adores and wishes he'd partnered up with from the start)? Oh, but he was merely acting as one of the best players to come out of Season 11 to lose right from the SHOTGUN.
EnricoV		#3629	[-]
Posts: 5956 (09/29/09 11:30 PM) Registered user More Recent Posts	Oh, please. We need evidence? As if there was any doubt that someone who nicknamed themselves "The Love Muscle" wasn't 100% pure douchebag.
ButFirst		#3630	[-]
Posts: 516 (09/30/09 12:05 AM) More Recent Posts	Constant change is here to stay. Remove this ad You guys bring up excellent points. Some of them should be submitted to real player before the Russ/Michele chat on Thursday. Preface it with, I am asking (insert question) to the Russell that was in the house, not this I-love-everyone/the-game-is-over Russell. I'd also know why he was so upset with Michele for bringing up the fact that he's got a limp dick to the rest of the house.
XianneKei		#3631	[-]
Posts: 3775 (09/30/09 01:34 AM) Registered User More Recent Posts	ITA with everyone about Russell. The guy had split personality in that house -- he couldn't decide which strategy to use and had he picked one or been open with his alliance about all the fake shit he was doing, no one would have ever believed Nat's lies. That's my opinion. Russell was a douche and still is a douche. I do hope some of you submit those questions to real because they are good ones and should be addressed. FWIW, Russell will also be on with RHRMike on Wednesday night at 9:00 PM Central Time (I think he changed the time due to Natalie being interviewed tomorrow on BBAD. And IMO, RHRMike does a really great interview. ETA: Just heard from Mike that the show may be changed all together so as not conflict with the Natalie interview. ::Sigh:: She is so not worth it. Last Edited By: XianneKei 09/30/09 02:50 AM. Edited 1 times.
chel87		#3632	[-]
Posts: 2148 (09/30/09 02:15 AM) Registered User More Recent Posts	Sup w/ the Russell hating? He played hard and out of all of them- I do believe everything he did was gameplay. He does seem like a genuinely good guy so it's reasonable to me that most of his outburts, etc. really were about wanting to be the villain. There wasn't anything he did that was any worse than what others did (well, except vote for Nat ;). I don't care what any of you think, Russ is awesome. deletes scenes of that pig whore slut BB10 April slithering all over him from memory
twinklefaery		#3633	[-]
Posts: 5186 (09/30/09 07:31 AM) More Recent Posts	Chel, I won't speak for everyone, but for me, it's not so much about Russell hating - it's more about major irritation bordering on disgust with Russell re-writing his history in the house. I mean, they all do it to some extent, but he's taking it to a whole nother level. There are some aspects of his game that were very good. But the ultimate truth of the matter is he was immature, and in many, many instances played a reactionary, emotional game. Michele approached him with a real live attempt at an alliance, and Russell's paranoia imploded his game, and nearly cost her hers. Michele had her own culpability in that situation because she was so damned sketchy, but he truly didn't give her a chance. He flew off the handle and brought the drama with the Chima meeting & house meeting. I'll go to my grave thinking Michele started in on Jeff and Jordan about backdooring Russell to pay him back for that. Russell could not make up his mind who he trusted and what he wanted to do in that house and he continually fucked up based on paranoia and impulsive immature reactions. Now that he's out of the house, he takes no responsibility for things that REALLY happened in his game and in that house. Really, I'm almost equally annoyed with Michele's revisionist history of HER gameplay. She flat out refuses to acknowledge her part in the F4 clusterfuck of getting the snowball started down that hill. She started in on J/J for no apparent reason on the "let's get Russell out now" plan getting in their ears about how he hates them, was targeting Jeff, etc. (Note to Team Michele: Let's not debate this topic again, shall we? I know you all don't agree that happened) (even though it did). This is just my opinion. My point is, I think Russell is squarely to blame for Michele going hard to try and backdoor him. She made a move to try and solidify a partnership with him and he IMMEDIATELY turned around and fucked her over and exposed her. And this wasn't the only impulsive, reactionary, overly emotional move Russell made in the game. Dude needs to grow up and quit re-writing history. Pretty much everyone else admits their major fuck ups or shortcomings in the game, but not him. For him, it was all "intentional" Yeah right. Pretty much everyone except Russell & Michele I should say - because I've been so disappointed in her post-show interviews. She really takes no responsibility for HER fuck ups in the game either.
SuperJude		#3634	[-]
Posts: 14246 (09/30/09 07:38 AM) Registered user More Recent Posts	I find the threat title to be HIGHLY IRONIC! -SJ™
Scinovium		#3635	[-]
Posts: 1017 (09/30/09 09:01 AM) Registered user More Recent Posts	polka dot wrote: ugh. disclaimer: i have never killed anyone by stabbing, nor have i been killed by stabbing. but i do know a person can be stabbed twice and survive without the victim being incapacitated by shock or the damage caused by the stabbing. if you don't believe me, goggle "stabbed twice" at http://google.news.com. I didn't say that there aren't reports of people being stabbed twice, of course those exists. But it's erroneous take what's being reported as being twice stabbed as actually being the case. Most reports of people being stabbed twice either depended on the police counting the stab wounds or the victim counting the stabs as they happened. In the first case, what might seem like 2 stabs is actually 3 or more stabs because the first couple of stabs occur in the same spot because it's easier to restabbed through the hole you already made. Also the police are lazy counters, they'll do anything to escape the task of counting. Have you heard the lazy reports of "multiple stab wounds"? That's when the police stopped counting at 3 and say "multiple" instead of being more exactly, like 12 or 14. In the 2nd case, the victim is wrong. They're either in shock, or counting pain spots but not stabbed. If you stabbed a person in the same spot, they're not going to think that's 2 stabs, they're thinking fuck that hurts, but a hurt in the same spot with one or 2 stabs = 1 pain. So the victim is not a reliable source of exact stab count. You need to ask the stabbers how many stabs they made, and they'll say 1, 3 or more, but never 2.
polka dot		#3636	[-]
Posts: 1116 (09/30/09 09:26 AM) More Recent Posts	alol
TheWhiteRabbit		#3637	[-]
Posts: 1272 (09/30/09 10:19 AM) More Recent Posts	AllieBuck wrote: . I didn't listen to the interview the other night so I guess I am wondering if they owned up to the mistakes they made... like Michele with her awkwardness/inability to communicate/bipolar behavior and Russell's general idiotic gameplay. Michele absolutely did. She's clear that if she ever got the chance to play again she would immediately defend herself against any lies put on her, even if that meant telling one of her allies they were wrong about what they thought they heard ala Jeff overhearing her Final 2 pact with Russ in the SS room. Although why she wouldn't have known to do this already is beyond me.
TheWhiteRabbit		#3638	[-]
Posts: 1273 (09/30/09 10:22 AM) More Recent Posts	SuperJude wrote: I find the threat title to be HIGHLY IRONIC! -SJ™ Assuming you meant thread, I actually think a season of Big Brother now finds it's shelf life extended more than ever before due to the advent of Twitter.
Lauriemeck		#3639	[-]
Posts: 1650 (09/30/09 11:01 AM) Registered User More Recent Posts	quote - Russell could not make up his mind who he trusted and what he wanted to do in that house and he continually fucked up based on paranoia and impulsive immature reactions. Now that he's out of the house, he takes no responsibility for things that REALLY happened in his game and in that house. - quote This is how I remember Russell. I wanted to like him, but never knew where he stood. Also, I LOVED him when he bullied Ronnie, only to have it all turn into an act. I still don't understand why the other houseguests hated Michelle. Of course, I don't watch the live feeds so I missed a lot that may have clued me in. Even her husband said her memory isn't very good, which explained why she would forget what she had said earlier. So she's bipolar, big deal. Lots of people are, there's medications for that kind of thing.
UnderMedicated		#3640	[-]
Posts: 298 (09/30/09 12:04 PM) More Recent Posts	Constant change is here to stay. Remove this ad Scinovium wrote: polka dot wrote: ugh. disclaimer: i have never killed anyone by stabbing, nor have i been killed by stabbing. but i do know a person can be stabbed twice and survive without the victim being incapacitated by shock or the damage caused by the stabbing. if you don't believe me, goggle "stabbed twice" at http://google.news.com. I didn't say that there aren't reports of people being stabbed twice, of course those exists. But it's erroneous take what's being reported as being twice stabbed as actually being the case. Most reports of people being stabbed twice either depended on the police counting the stab wounds or the victim counting the stabs as they happened. In the first case, what might seem like 2 stabs is actually 3 or more stabs because the first couple of stabs occur in the same spot because it's easier to restabbed through the hole you already made. Also the police are lazy counters, they'll do anything to escape the task of counting. Have you heard the lazy reports of "multiple stab wounds"? That's when the police stopped counting at 3 and say "multiple" instead of being more exactly, like 12 or 14. In the 2nd case, the victim is wrong. They're either in shock, or counting pain spots but not stabbed. If you stabbed a person in the same spot, they're not going to think that's 2 stabs, they're thinking fuck that hurts, but a hurt in the same spot with one or 2 stabs = 1 pain. So the victim is not a reliable source of exact stab count. You need to ask the stabbers how many stabs they made, and they'll say 1, 3 or more, but never 2. Your seemingly expertise in this specific subject is worrying me a little. Next time, can you target Ronnie or Nastilie?

<< Previous Topic Next Topic >>

Yuku free message boards

OMG!!! It's over!!!