tullfan2 wrote:
craig wrote:Most of your statement is true but I think that Natalie wins S19 rather than Mick. Natalie is the more apt analogy to Amber (JLew didn't ride coat tails, if anything Rupert rode JLew's coattails). The edit of S19 has shown a few moments of strategic insight from Natalie (similar to Amber) whereas we haven't seen any strategy from Mick whatsoever. Russell is severely underestimating Natalie whereas he hasn't talked much about Mick at all.
So do I. If Sandra really does win I hope she doesn't win like Amber did by riding coat tails and winning because she is seen as less objectionable than either Russell or Parvati or that she needs the money more than the other 2.Evil Russell is basically Boston Rob on steroids (controlling the game and alienating jurors), so an Amber or JLew like game will probably win. Mick is already doing it in S19.
Agreed. The scene 2 scenes that REALLY struck me about Natalie latelty where,
1-How she was shown talking about the fact that she thinks they can flip some Galu members(Why her out of everyone else?? it shows she IS thinking about the game)
2-That "High five" Between Liz and Natalie. Liz knew Natalie was voting her, and yet they still seemned cool. I think is a very important scene, and illiustrates why Natalie may win. Natalie is keeping good relationships with the voted out contestants, while Russel is just alienating them.
So yeah I could totally see Natalie winning.
