Thailandsurvivor wrote:
Dr Will Hatch two point oh wrote:
Haven't we done this before?
F6-Amanda
F5-Erik(Yes, Natalie and Alexis give up their lead to get rid of this big challenge threat)
F4-Cirie or Alexis
F3-Cirie or Alexis
Based on challenge statistics, Parvati is a better challenge performer then Cirie, Natalie or Alexis. This strongly hints at her winning the last challenge. She probably takes Natalie.
Eliza: Parvati
Ozzy:Natalie
Jason:Parvati
James:Natalie
Amanda:Parvati
Erik:Natalie
Cirie:Parvati
Alexis: Parvati, based on what she will "do" with the money.
It's not a foolproof speculation, but a solid one if I say so myself.
Even if they wanted to get rid of Erik before Cirie (which I don't buy at all), he won immunity at the final 5. There was no way in hell Natalie tries to have him give it to her if the fans have the numbers. Cirie goes at 5. Erik will leave the first time he doesn't win immunity, and Parvati will go if he does. The finals consists of Natalie and Alexis barring an immunity win.
Now, even if your theory works out, a jury vote between Parvati and Natalie is an easy win for the fan. Eliza has said countless times her thread that she was rooting for the fans (on the show, in Ponderosa clips, in her thread), Ozzy and James despised Parv, Alexis was her best friend from day one (that is ridiculous if you really don't think she would vote for Natalie). That's 4 votes right there, Parv has Amanda and Cirie for sure. Jason didn't know that Natalie was behind his boot (she didn't vote for him), and he thought they were friends. If Natalie doesn't take out Erik in such a way that happened on the show, he would definitely vote for his fellow fan. I'm not 100% on Erik and Jason, but at the very least, Natalie has a tie.
It seems illogical that Natalie or Alexis would keep a challenge threat like Erik around over Cirie, when they easily could have booted her the next round. Why would Erik give up his immunity? I think that they could have pulled off the same stunt by threatening him with jury votes. If it worked in the RL scenario, it's not a stretch to say he would have done it in without the Amanda guilt.
In the F4, they either do the tiebreaker thing, or assuming that they all believe a Final 3 is in play, convince Parv of Cirie's jury threat. Cirie leaves.
In the F3, only Parv has shown actual challenge competancy. In lieu of actual evidence, her challenge feats are all we have to rely on for speculative purposes. I believe she would take Natalie over Alexis, but I am not committed to it.
I agree that Natalie at least has a tie, but again, I believe this works in Parvati's favor. If it is firestarting, a revote, or a challenge, Parv has shown to be more consistent then the other two.










