Questions that never were answered

0 Kudos

Started By	Comment
ilovekelly752		#441	[-]
Posts: 319 (11/11/09 6:29 PM) Reply Quote More Recent Posts	sddorme wrote: Only way that could happen is if the original vote is 3-3-3 which is extremely unlikely What if it's 4-4-1, shouldn't that 1 get to vote? If not, what about in Micronesia when there were 8? What would they have done if Eliza changed her vote? And 3-3-3 is unlikely, but not impossible.
sddorme.idolnoise		#442	[-]
Posts: 408 (11/11/09 6:29 PM) Reply Quote More Recent Posts	If it's 4-4-1 then the person who voted that 1 will vote for the winner out of the 2 people who got the 4's
ilovekelly752		#443	[-]
Posts: 320 (11/11/09 6:32 PM) Reply Quote More Recent Posts	AussieOriginal wrote: Why would you just make this up. Its a known fact Kelly G was cut last minute for Shiiann. Amber cut nobody out Amber was casted at the start. Had Elizabeth or Colleen continued on with the casting process for ASS its speculated Amber would not have been casted. I did not make that up. Why would you think I "just made it up", just because you don't like it? Kelly was not cut for Shii-Ann, she was cut for Amber so that Amber and Rob could continue their fledgling romance. If you don't like it, too fucking bad. Didn't Amber say she hated Rob in the first day or two?
ilovekelly752		#444	[-]
Posts: 321 (11/11/09 6:33 PM) Reply Quote More Recent Posts	sddorme wrote: If it's 4-4-1 then the person who voted that 1 will vote for the winner out of the 2 people who got the 4's I mean the 1 who was voted for. Like, if Randy would've voted for Sugar in Gabon, shouldn't Sugar get to vote between Bob and Susie?
sddorme.idolnoise		#445	[-]
Posts: 409 (11/11/09 6:35 PM) Reply Quote More Recent Posts	ilovekelly752 wrote: sddorme wrote: If it's 4-4-1 then the person who voted that 1 will vote for the winner out of the 2 people who got the 4's I mean the 1 who was voted for. Like, if Randy would've voted for Sugar in Gabon, shouldn't Sugar get to vote between Bob and Susie? If Randy would've voted for Sugar in Gabon, then Randy will vote again between Bob and Susie, I don't think it makes any sense for Sugar to vote
ilovekelly752		#446	[-]
Posts: 322 (11/11/09 6:45 PM) Reply Quote More Recent Posts	sddorme wrote: ilovekelly752 wrote: sddorme wrote: If it's 4-4-1 then the person who voted that 1 will vote for the winner out of the 2 people who got the 4's I mean the 1 who was voted for. Like, if Randy would've voted for Sugar in Gabon, shouldn't Sugar get to vote between Bob and Susie? If Randy would've voted for Sugar in Gabon, then Randy will vote again between Bob and Susie, I don't think it makes any sense for Sugar to vote Why not? She made it further than anyone on the jury, and then she was eliminated when it was a tie. It's not really fair for her to have done all that and not get to vote.
burberrylad		#447	[-]
Posts: 896 (11/11/09 7:18 PM) Registered user Reply Quote More Recent Posts	great personality wrote: Now if Sue won f3 immunity I would like to think she wouldn't be dumb enough to bring Rudy. This is Sue Hawk you are talking about
sddorme.idolnoise		#448	[-]
Posts: 411 (11/11/09 7:24 PM) Reply Quote More Recent Posts	ilovekelly752 wrote: sddorme wrote: ilovekelly752 wrote: sddorme wrote: If it's 4-4-1 then the person who voted that 1 will vote for the winner out of the 2 people who got the 4's I mean the 1 who was voted for. Like, if Randy would've voted for Sugar in Gabon, shouldn't Sugar get to vote between Bob and Susie? If Randy would've voted for Sugar in Gabon, then Randy will vote again between Bob and Susie, I don't think it makes any sense for Sugar to vote Why not? She made it further than anyone on the jury, and then she was eliminated when it was a tie. It's not really fair for her to have done all that and not get to vote. Because she's not a part of the jury so she should never be
ilovekelly752		#449	[-]
Posts: 323 (11/11/09 7:28 PM) Reply Quote More Recent Posts	sddorme wrote: ilovekelly752 wrote: sddorme wrote: ilovekelly752 wrote: sddorme wrote: If it's 4-4-1 then the person who voted that 1 will vote for the winner out of the 2 people who got the 4's I mean the 1 who was voted for. Like, if Randy would've voted for Sugar in Gabon, shouldn't Sugar get to vote between Bob and Susie? If Randy would've voted for Sugar in Gabon, then Randy will vote again between Bob and Susie, I don't think it makes any sense for Sugar to vote Why not? She made it further than anyone on the jury, and then she was eliminated when it was a tie. It's not really fair for her to have done all that and not get to vote. Because she's not a part of the jury so she should never be But it's still an unanswered question what would've happened in the case of Amanda and Parvati, or what would happen with a possible 3-3-3 vote. Last Edited By: ilovekelly752 11/11/09 7:35 PM. Edited 1 times.
sddorme.idolnoise		#450	[-]
Posts: 413 (11/11/09 7:31 PM) Reply Quote More Recent Posts	ilovekelly752 wrote: sddorme wrote: ilovekelly752 wrote: sddorme wrote: ilovekelly752 wrote: sddorme wrote: If it's 4-4-1 then the person who voted that 1 will vote for the winner out of the 2 people who got the 4's I mean the 1 who was voted for. Like, if Randy would've voted for Sugar in Gabon, shouldn't Sugar get to vote between Bob and Susie? If Randy would've voted for Sugar in Gabon, then Randy will vote again between Bob and Susie, I don't think it makes any sense for Sugar to vote Why not? She made it further than anyone on the jury, and then she was eliminated when it was a tie. It's not really fair for her to have done all that and not get to vote. Because she's not a part of the jury so she should never be But it's still an unanswered question what would've happened in the case of Amanda and Parvati, and a possible 3-3-3 vote. You mean 4-4. I really have no idea I'm just saying what makes the most sense. This is an "unanswered question"
ilovekelly752		#451	[-]
Posts: 324 (11/11/09 7:34 PM) Reply Quote More Recent Posts	sddorme wrote: ilovekelly752 wrote: sddorme wrote: ilovekelly752 wrote: sddorme wrote: ilovekelly752 wrote: sddorme wrote: If it's 4-4-1 then the person who voted that 1 will vote for the winner out of the 2 people who got the 4's I mean the 1 who was voted for. Like, if Randy would've voted for Sugar in Gabon, shouldn't Sugar get to vote between Bob and Susie? If Randy would've voted for Sugar in Gabon, then Randy will vote again between Bob and Susie, I don't think it makes any sense for Sugar to vote Why not? She made it further than anyone on the jury, and then she was eliminated when it was a tie. It's not really fair for her to have done all that and not get to vote. Because she's not a part of the jury so she should never be But it's still an unanswered question what would've happened in the case of Amanda and Parvati, and a possible 3-3-3 vote. You mean 4-4. I really have no idea I'm just saying what makes the most sense. This is an "unanswered question" I meant the Parvati and Amanda thing and the 3-3-3 thing as two different situations.
sddorme.idolnoise		#452	[-]
Posts: 415 (11/11/09 7:38 PM) Reply Quote More Recent Posts	ilovekelly752 wrote: sddorme wrote: ilovekelly752 wrote: sddorme wrote: ilovekelly752 wrote: sddorme wrote: ilovekelly752 wrote: sddorme wrote: If it's 4-4-1 then the person who voted that 1 will vote for the winner out of the 2 people who got the 4's I mean the 1 who was voted for. Like, if Randy would've voted for Sugar in Gabon, shouldn't Sugar get to vote between Bob and Susie? If Randy would've voted for Sugar in Gabon, then Randy will vote again between Bob and Susie, I don't think it makes any sense for Sugar to vote Why not? She made it further than anyone on the jury, and then she was eliminated when it was a tie. It's not really fair for her to have done all that and not get to vote. Because she's not a part of the jury so she should never be But it's still an unanswered question what would've happened in the case of Amanda and Parvati, and a possible 3-3-3 vote. You mean 4-4. I really have no idea I'm just saying what makes the most sense. This is an "unanswered question" I meant the Parvati and Amanda thing and the 3-3-3 thing as two different situations. Oh well like I said, I'm just saying something that makes sense, I really haven no idea
seltzer3		#453	[-]
Posts: 1498 (11/11/09 7:43 PM) Registered User Reply Quote More Recent Posts	I think I may have asked this question, but whatever I'll ask it anyways. Say if Michelle from Fiji didn't get voted off in the twist (Say Edgardo gets voted off). What would happen during the final 5/6? I would expect the final 6/7 to be Yau-man, Michelle, Boo, Stacy, Earl, Cassandra, and Dreamz. My big question is will Earl side with Yau-man and Michelle...or will he stick to what actually happen, with Cassandra and Dreamz?
SurferZ		#454	[-]
Posts: 11 (11/11/09 9:26 PM) Reply Quote More Recent Posts	Did Randy ever get a new dog?
Shred		#455	[-]
Posts: 3 (11/11/09 10:33 PM) Reply Quote More Recent Posts	To the Earl comment, I think the final 4 would have been Earl, Yau Man, Michelle and Cassandra With Earl kicking out Cassandra at 4, Yau Man wins. Michelle is 3rd.
survivorfanfromaustralia		#456	[-]
Posts: 17 (11/12/09 12:26 AM) Reply Quote More Recent Posts	in a 4-4 situation, i can only realistically see 2 things happenning, the pre-jury vote offs would vote a winner, but only those that actually met the two people (parvati, amanda), so only johnathan, ami, yau-man and fairplay gets to vote. If thats a tie, i guess you go to a countback system (either immunity wins or votes recieved in game) i dunno, so confusing, it has to be a vote or countback, nothing dependant on luck (especially with $900,000 dollars on the line).
Ahora		#457	[-]
Posts: 655 (11/12/09 12:52 AM) Reply Quote More Recent Posts	seltzer3 wrote: I think I may have asked this question, but whatever I'll ask it anyways. Say if Michelle from Fiji didn't get voted off in the twist (Say Edgardo gets voted off). What would happen during the final 5/6? I would expect the final 6/7 to be Yau-man, Michelle, Boo, Stacy, Earl, Cassandra, and Dreamz. My big question is will Earl side with Yau-man and Michelle...or will he stick to what actually happen, with Cassandra and Dreamz? Wasn't Boo the target at final 10 but got saved by the twist?
XtremeInnovator420		#458	[-]
Posts: 2418 (11/12/09 3:06 PM) Registered user Reply Quote More Recent Posts	Yeah, he was. And if I remember correctly, BOTH sides wanted to get rid of him then.
tedhighway		#459	[-]
Posts: 438 (11/12/09 10:01 PM) Reply Quote More Recent Posts	Were these magical rawks that Debb intended to build the shelter with? One of the greatest mysteries of our time
Lexxan	Cook Islands Contestant?	#460	[-]
Posts: 170 (11/13/09 3:50 PM) Reply Quote More Recent Posts	WTF is Rebecca Borman

<< Previous Topic Next Topic >>

Yuku free message boards

Questions that never were answered