Shagnanigans wrote:He's adorable.
Yes, it's my boy. People always ask for updates on him and new pics, and I get tired of doing a bunch of PMs. I'm using this as my Facebook pic so plenty of Sucksters were seeing him anyway.
| Started By | Comment | ||
|---|---|---|---|
Anne Boleyn |
|||
Shagnanigans wrote:He's adorable. |
|||
Shagnanigans |
|||
|
Thanks. That's his "I just destroyed something" happy-face.
|
|||
Anne Boleyn |
|||
|
Savor every moment. It goes by too damn fast.
|
|||
susieq |
|||
|
Self exam does work. I know two women who are alive because of it. One of them had the really aggressive, fast-growing type of cancer. She missed over a year
of work for treatment.
I think it should start at 40. Mine started before 40 because of a lump and family history. It turned out to be a Benign lump but I would willingly go through the tests (biopsy, ultrasound, and then removal of lump) again. I guess the question is whether finding even one under-50 cancer by mammography (that wouldn't have been found by any other means in a treatable stage) is worth all of the other issues. To me, the answer is yes. |
|||
NickF227 |
|||
|
My aunt had breast cancer a little bit ago. I think she found it with BSE, IIRC.
|
|||
Trixie Delight |
|||
|
Considering this study was done with only 1900 women, I'm not too comfortable taking that recommendation.
|
|||
superguppie |
|||
|
You are right TrixieD. There are definitely good mammo techs and bad ones. And they are quite clearly categorized with the good ones in high SES areas and the
bad ones in low SES regions.
Self exam does work. I know two women who are alive because of it. One of them had the really aggressive, fast-growing type of cancer. She missed over a year of work for treatment.The plural of anecdote is not data. The studies of BSE that were done had over 200,000 women in them. No effect of self-exam in prevention of breast cancer. |
|||
dottstar |
|||
|
Pretty sure it's the WHO recommendation. It's sort of like PSAs. When that test first came out everyone and there brother wanted it and usually only
caught the people in their 70s and the question to treat or not with the quality of life like leaking urine etc .. In England they do fine with mammos one
every 3 years for the 50 to 75 yrs old folks. I worked as UM nurse and if you have family history you are to get the first one way earlier then 40, I think
it's 35 but those folks are ok to get mammos in the 20s too if I recall correctly if there is two or more family members with breast or ovarian ca. I think
they also added colon ca as a risk recently for that genetic mutation factor. ETA: yup the folks with the family history can go ahead and get the breast
removed and have implants as a precaution in early 20s so those that choose to take the chance on ca can just instead get mammos. Sounds like playing Russian
roulette to me.
Yeah, I never meet a patient that did the BSE correctly and first it was taught to stand and then it was taught to lie and do it -- most women who caught it was accidentally found with shower or other behavior like the spouse going hey, why do you have this hard lump? Oh, or they had a leaky nipple. That freaked me out when I first had a patient complain of that because ... yikes. I just got a letter from my dr. office saying they been trying to reach me to come for a colonoscopy ... hmm, runs in my family but really no one died from it so why torment me. I'm going to call and say NO. So I guess the insurance companies that check the HEDIS stuff want that done to unsuspecting patients too. Never admit to anything that leads to invasive testing is going to be my new rule.
Last Edited By: dottstar
11/19/09 5:17 PM.
Edited 1 times.
|
|||