Yuku free message boards

Shambo was OTTN - the cackling at the beginning was funny, but she was wrong (she told the camera that only she and Russell knew what was going to happen. Uh-uh. RH also told J and M.) But the stuff at IC was downright hostile. Yeah, Laura was bitchy to her a couple times, and they clearly don't like each other, but both spouse and I went, Uh-oh, with that IC act. It was a lengthy shot, and was purposeful. I don't see NN, but the clear intent was Shambo reveling in the beat-down of her nemesis.

The sad piano music was for Blake. Look at his body language. He's seeing the Galu tribe crumble before his eyes. It adds to the depth and mystery of his amazing edit. And he was NOT 1. Sorry.

Also - did you notice that one of the shots of K in the jury was from an upcoming week? She looked to her left (our right) at someone, a surprised expression on her face. you saw the shoulder of a larger person, I assume it's a guy, in an ecru-colored T-shirt. Erik wasn't wearing that this week, so it wasn't a camera reversal. Very bad editing boo-boo. also, the people who write the subtitles need spellcheck. They misspelled "feasible" as "feasable."

Mick? UTR2, I suppose. Maybe MOR2. Doesn't matter, won't sway anyone in either direction.

Except for the N stuff that Jaison spoke about quitting or just wanting to outlast some people, he has the best edgic edit so far. And technically, "Survivor was a bad decision for me"-type quotes are not actually part of edgic.

Natalie? Clearly a 1. Does that affect her chances of winning? Not really, one way or the other.

John was not N. He was clearly frustrated at the lack of strategic smarts on his team, and put his foot down finally about the stupid "Hey, John - we have a great plan - we want foa to vote for you and it will be so cool!" notion. He was 100% right in his assessments of their moves so far. He will have hell to pay for switching, but even his rationale: it's the only way to guarantee he'll still be playing in the morning - was spot-on. And notice JP's surprise that they're all willing a 12.5% chance of going home after 29 days etc etc. John seemed to be on JP's side in this argument, and JP is never, ever wrong. BTW, if we're looking for a truly non-edgic winner, I've said it was John for a while. He won't win - heck, this manuever of his cost him votes probably. But he's a guy who understands the game pretty well. Too bad he believed RH.

RH's crap in the preview has nothing to do with his rating this week, which was probably a straight CP. But damn, that was OTTN or even NN stuff the first time we saw it, and there is absolutely no reason to do it right now. He seems to have things under control, and it is both unnecessarily mean and without benefit to stir things up. Right now things look good for him, so why do something big and huge and meaningless - other than he's a lousy media whore, playing to the cameras. To the RH fans, explain why they would show this crap yet again if he was the winner, both from a edit perspective and an SEG perspective.

Also, if next week is a recap that gives us Dec 3, 10, and 17th before the finale. There are 9 left. Do the math - how does it work? Unless the finale is 6??? Or there is a double boot?