Natalie = new Sugar? - Survivor Sucks - Survivor Related - Survivor Sucks - Message Board Yuku

logotop

logobottom

Home | Contribute

0 Kudos

<< Previous Topic Next Topic >>

Natalie = new Sugar?

Started By	Comment
gervasemyman		#61	[-]
Posts: 1589 (11/16/09 11:54 AM) I'm with STUPID! Reply Quote More Recent Posts	Yeah you already posted that exact thing somewhere else.
Sshaaz		#62	[-]
Posts: 438 (11/16/09 12:21 PM) Reply Quote More Recent Posts	Has Natalie been shown to do anything dumb at all? From an editing standpoint, there's no reason to not like her. I guess some could argue that her "trust" in Russell is a dumb move, but if Russell sits next to her at FTC, how does she lose? That rat scene is the best they could come up with so far to justify a "winner's edit," but until she actually loses a chicken or shows everyone her HII, up to and including picture-mail on her blackberry to every survivor that has ever been on the show, she's likable and wins if she makes it to the end.
boraboran	Natalie = New Sugar	#63	[-]
Posts: 100 (11/16/09 1:46 PM) Reply Quote More Recent Posts	I though Splenda was the new sugar???
smellofawoman		#64	[-]
Posts: 332 (11/16/09 1:58 PM) Reply Quote More Recent Posts	Natalie could be the new Danni: the one that sneakily but quietly finds herself at the final tribal council. Also, did Sugar fans actually read the post-show interviews when she said Bob treated the female crew members poorly and that he was a pervert? That's not exactly what I consider a father-daughter relationship...
aboutbreakingrules	Cultivate the bench!	#65	[-]
Posts: 811 (11/16/09 3:24 PM) Reply Quote More Recent Posts	Sshaaz wrote: Has Natalie been shown to do anything dumb at all? From an editing standpoint, there's no reason to not like her. I guess some could argue that her "trust" in Russell is a dumb move, but if Russell sits next to her at FTC, how does she lose? That rat scene is the best they could come up with so far to justify a "winner's edit," but until she actually loses a chicken or shows everyone her HII, up to and including picture-mail on her blackberry to every survivor that has ever been on the show, she's likable and wins if she makes it to the end. No matter what spin his defenders try to put on his hustle, she was seen as playing the peacekeeper and social butterfly. Not him. Jurors are usually more impressed by subtle low-key personalities over gigantic or blatant personalities. Given the idol play that dropped Kelly through the trapdoor and the manner in which the troll conducted himself at that play, no one in Mother Hen Morett's posse is going to point the finger at Natalie. That's another key difference between Our Miss White and Viper Kiper: one is actually governing her emotions while the other let her emotions govern her.
Understandermant		#66	[-]
Posts: 371 (11/16/09 9:10 PM) Reply Quote More Recent Posts	But Natalie voted for Kelly. Didnt she have some sort of Sub alliance with the Galugirls?
ojodelaplata		#67	[-]
Posts: 183 (11/20/09 1:29 PM) Reply Quote More Recent Posts	Natalie = Sugar!!!! :)
pearly whites		#68	[-]
Posts: 1565 (11/20/09 1:39 PM) Reply Quote More Recent Posts	Sugar has a pretty face and an ugly ass. Natalie has a pretty ass and an ugly face.
MonkeeSpanker		#69	[-]
Posts: 1004 (11/20/09 2:40 PM) Reply Quote More Recent Posts	Natalie is invisible, her greatest claim to fame is being part of the dumb bitch alliance. Sugar at least tried to play the game even though she was brutal.

<< Previous Topic Next Topic >>

Message board courtesy of Survivor Sucks member support.
Benevolent dictatorship courtesy of Survivor Sucks Admin Idoits.