Yuku free message boards

squashthebeef wrote:

---

Maybe if Bush hadn't cut those taxes to get rid of a surplus that now apparently never existed, we wouldn't be in this financial mess.

Awsome plan. Let's put it into action.

And here I thought the reason behind those tax cuts was the recession he "inherited" that was caused by the dot com bust and the tech boom going flat. I guess glazer has completely forgotten about those things happening.

Anyone else remember how the libs on this board tried to blame Bush for Enron and World Com going under because all the bad decisions and illegal shit they did during the previous administration finally came to a head in Bush's first year? Their so-called logic was that the shit hit the fan during Bush's term, so it was his fault. These same libs are now saying that everything going wrong for Obama is Bush's fault because the precursors happened during Bush's presidency.

Yet these same hypocrites are trying to tell use that we shouldn't say anything about the mountain of debt Obama is running up, because we didn't protest loudly enough for their tastes about the debt Bush and the Pubs ran up. Debt which totaled $2.8 trillion for the first six years of his presidency, when Congress was under GOP control (and spending like drunken sailors), and somehow shot up another $1.5 trillion in the two years after those thrifty Dems took control of both houses.

glazerboy wrote:

---

bob2559 wrote:

---

squashthebeef wrote:

---

Maybe if Bush hadn't cut those taxes to get rid of a surplus that now apparently never existed, we wouldn't be in this financial mess.

Awsome plan. Let's put it into action.

And here I thought the reason behind those tax cuts was the recession he "inherited" that was caused by the dot com bust and the tech boom going flat. I guess glazer has completely forgotten about those things happening.

Anyone else remember how the libs on this board tried to blame Bush for Enron and World Com going under because all the bad decisions and illegal shit they did during the previous administration finally came to a head in Bush's first year? Their so-called logic was that the shit hit the fan during Bush's term, so it was his fault. These same libs are now saying that everything going wrong for Obama is Bush's fault because the precursors happened during Bush's presidency.

Yet these same hypocrites are trying to tell use that we shouldn't say anything about the mountain of debt Obama is running up, because we didn't protest loudly enough for their tastes about the debt Bush and the Pubs ran up. Debt which totaled $2.8 trillion for the first six years of his presidency, when Congress was under GOP control (and spending like drunken sailors), and somehow shot up another $1.5 trillion in the two years after those thrifty Dems took control of both houses.

Weeeeeelllll, then this would be Bush's recession and not Obama's since we are seeing the fruition of Bush's plans now. Remember this had all started while W was getting ready to get the fuck out of Dodge.

And merkyl, if you had ever, EVER once defended Bush without a "Yah but Clinton..." I might bother to read your posts.

Actually, this all started many years before Bush was about to leave office...





In other words, Bush in 2001 warned that Freddie and Fannie were out of control and could cause an economic catastrophe if something wasn't done, but Barney frank and the Dims in congress were all "No, no, no... everything is fine and you're just a Chicken Little who is trying to scare people and hates the poor and minorities for trying to get us to be fiscally responsible".� Seven years later the very thing that Bush and Pubs have been warning about finally happens and all the libs and Dims yell "It's Bush's fault!!!".

glazerboy wrote:

---

bob2559 wrote:

---

glazerboy wrote:

---

bob2559 wrote:

---

squashthebeef wrote:

---

Maybe if Bush hadn't cut those taxes to get rid of a surplus that now apparently never existed, we wouldn't be in this financial mess.

Awsome plan. Let's put it into action.

And here I thought the reason behind those tax cuts was the recession he "inherited" that was caused by the dot com bust and the tech boom going flat. I guess glazer has completely forgotten about those things happening.

Anyone else remember how the libs on this board tried to blame Bush for Enron and World Com going under because all the bad decisions and illegal shit they did during the previous administration finally came to a head in Bush's first year? Their so-called logic was that the shit hit the fan during Bush's term, so it was his fault. These same libs are now saying that everything going wrong for Obama is Bush's fault because the precursors happened during Bush's presidency.

Yet these same hypocrites are trying to tell use that we shouldn't say anything about the mountain of debt Obama is running up, because we didn't protest loudly enough for their tastes about the debt Bush and the Pubs ran up. Debt which totaled $2.8 trillion for the first six years of his presidency, when Congress was under GOP control (and spending like drunken sailors), and somehow shot up another $1.5 trillion in the two years after those thrifty Dems took control of both houses.

Weeeeeelllll, then this would be Bush's recession and not Obama's since we are seeing the fruition of Bush's plans now. Remember this had all started while W was getting ready to get the fuck out of Dodge.

And merkyl, if you had ever, EVER once defended Bush without a "Yah but Clinton..." I might bother to read your posts.

Actually, this all started many years before Bush was about to leave office...





In other words, Bush in 2001 warned that Freddie and Fannie were out of control and could cause an economic catastrophe if something wasn't done, but Barney frank and the Dims in congress were all "No, no, no... everything is fine and you're just a Chicken Little who is trying to scare people and hates the poor and minorities for trying to get us to be fiscally responsible". Seven years later the very thing that Bush and Pubs have been warning about finally happens and all the libs and Dims yell "It's Bush's fault!!!".

Just makes you wish the majority party had shown some leadership and done something about it.

Pubes: ineffectual even when in charge.

Bush never had the kind of majority that Obama has, and yet all I hear from the libs is how the Pubs are blocking Obama's agenda.� So, if you consider the Pubs ineffectual with much smaller majorities than the Dims have now, then you must really think the Dims are hopelessly inept.� Either that, or you're a complete hypocrite who is completely unable to see beyond party labels.