| Started By | Comment | ||
|---|---|---|---|
 perfidiousamber |
|||
|
Posts: 749 (11/23/09 11:45 PM) Registered User |
Warn me about what? That you're going to sit on my face until I suffocate or something?I so anticipated a response like this. Yes, I'm going to suffocate you. Or poison you in your sleep. Or cunningly hypnotize you into falling off a cliff. Or hire a gang of orangutans to snatch you out of your car and rip your face off. Or send quantum-physically enhanced electrons through my fingertips into the keyboard and through the ethernet to electro-zapify you into a frozen effigy. Cretin. 
|
||
|
MakePaulaCry |
|||
|
Posts: 4336 (11/23/09 11:46 PM) Registered user |
^
x 0
|
||
|
MikiBoi |
|||
|
Posts: 7777 (11/23/09 11:47 PM) Registered user |
KellysMomCalledMeFine wrote: I hate Bieber so no, but I think he's gonna be a big artist. I want Janet's, Gaga's, 2 Glee c.d.'s, possibly Carrie's and Leona's after a good listen, God.ess Alexandra Burke. So far, I've bought zero, lol. |
||
|
KellysMomCalledMeFine |
|||
|
Posts: 3839 (11/23/09 11:51 PM) Registered User |
MikiBoi wrote:So queer! <3 I do want Gaga's now. Her AMA's performance finally brought me over to the dark side. I think it was Speechless that did it. |
||
 Glamor Lohan |
|||
|
Posts: 415 (11/23/09 11:53 PM) |
Or poison you in your sleep. Or cunningly hypnotize you into falling off a cliff. Or hire a gang of orangutans to snatch you out of your car and rip your face off. Or send quantum-physically enhanced electrons through my fingertips into the keyboard and through the ethernet to electro-zapify you into a frozen effigy. Cretin. You do know that "quantum-physically enhanced electrons" is a rubbish phrase, right? You can't physically enhance electrons, you can only enhance their charges. And "quantum-physically" doesn't exist - "quantum physics" is a noun, so you can't use that phrase like an adverb. That's like saying that you are babbling "Sparkle-Cowly". Also, orangutans don't form gangs, and the correct word to use for simians is "troop", so it should be "a troop of orangutans". You cannot "cunningly hypnotize" someone, because hypnotism requires full cooperation of the participant, there is no sneaking around to do it. And as with "quantum physically", "electro-zapify" is a nonsensical term. If you want to freeze someone, I'd suggest replacing "electro-zapify" with the more appropriate and simple "freeze". And frankly, electrons cannot freeze anyone. Freezing occurs when the temperature falls below an object's freezing point, causing the distance between the molecules to come closer to form a solid state.
Last Edited By: Glamor Lohan
11/23/09 11:55 PM.
Edited 1 times.
|
||
|
KellysMomCalledMeFine |
|||
|
Posts: 3841 (11/23/09 11:56 PM) Registered User |
This kind of talk is too intelligent for an Adam love
thread.
|
||
|
perfidiousamber |
|||
|
Posts: 750 (11/23/09 11:58 PM) Registered User |
Uncalled for shit? You must be talking about Adam's performance.Hee! that's a good one. Yah you won't believe me, but seriously I thought it was a funny jab, which I don't mind at all. |
||
|
perfidiousamber |
|||
|
Posts: 751 (11/24/09 12:11 AM) Registered User |
You do know that "quantum-physically enhanced electrons" is a rubbish phrase, right? You can't physically enhance electrons, you can only enhance their charges. And "quantum-physically" doesn't exist - "quantum physics" is a noun, so you can't use that phrase like an adverb. That's like saying that you are babbling "Sparkle-Cowly". Also, orangutans don't form gangs, and the correct word to use for simians is "troop", so it should be "a troop of orangutans". You cannot "cunningly hypnotize" someone, because hypnotism requires full cooperation of the participant, there is no sneaking around to do it. And as with "quantum physically", "electro-zapify" is a nonsensical term. If you want to freeze someone, I'd suggest replacing "electro-zapify" with the more appropriate and simple "freeze". And frankly, electrons cannot freeze anyone. Freezing occurs when the temperature falls below an object's freezing point, causing the distance between the molecules to come closer to form a solid stateOH MY GOD!! Are you actually telling me you took all that escalating gibberish ending in the plutentionally superbulous (phrase trademarked by me) sci fi babble for real, or at least attempted to cow me with your witheringly acute scientific knowledge?? I am so going to print out this post and keep it FOREVER!!
|
||
|
Glamor Lohan |
|||
|
Posts: 416 (11/24/09 12:11 AM) |
The only thing that makes sense in your latest post is "cow me", but I think you are missing a "=" between "cow" and
"me".
|
||
|
Gawkamoley |
|||
|
Posts: 178 (11/24/09 12:19 AM) |
KellysMomCalledMeFine wrote:Now that performance was a show stopper. She also heard more than tepid applause at the end of it. Nor did she let that performance art she loves to create detract from her excellent vocals. The richness of her voice wasn't once toned down while that piano burned. When she broke the empty liquor bottles against it, it was with the music, not obstructing the music. You don't stop the music to make a shock move and then go on. It breaks the flow of the performance and takes away from the musicality of the piece. That's why Adam's kiss was a head shaker to so many people. Most could care less that he kissed a guy. What the kissing did was break into the musicality of his performance. It was also all his own choice. No one forced it on him. Maybe this was a great move for some wild publicity push. However, for those of us who loved his potential to bring us good music, the promise of that is diminished when he seems willing to kiss off the music for the smarmy show. |
||
|
KellysMomCalledMeFine |
|||
|
Posts: 3842 (11/24/09 12:24 AM) Registered User |
I agree 100%, G. If Adam wants to go the creative/artistic route, then fine. Just don't sacrifice your musicality for it. He should take a step back and
watch Gaga just a little bit more. She's perfected the craft.
I am suddenly craving some nachos. Nice screen name.
Last Edited By: KellysMomCalledMeFine
11/24/09 12:37 AM.
Edited 1 times.
|
||
|
kooyah |
|||
|
Posts: 5401 (11/24/09 12:36 AM) |
Gawkamoley wrote: Um, yeah, that's what I was getting at earlier, but all I got was a bunch of pictures of Madonna, Lady Gaga, and whoever else, along with the response that it really isn't about music. |
||
|
perfidiousamber |
|||
|
Posts: 752 (11/24/09 12:36 AM) Registered User |
Freezing occurs when the temperature falls below an object's freezing point, causing the distance between the molecules to come closer to form a solid state. And what, pray tell, might such an object's freezing point be? I'm sure there must be some universal one as it doesn't seem to make much difference what components, proportions or configurations the "object" is composed of, or of the surrounding temperature or pressure, and to hell with those stupid laws of thermodyanmics, what did that idiot Newton know anyway. And this - "causing the distance between the molecules to come closer to form a solid state" is the most ridiculous piece of shit I've ever read.. nothing can overcome electron theory and actually cause distances between molecules to become shorter, without DRASTICALLY increasing the energy in the system and causing things to become EXPLOSIVELY hotter. ("Neutron star" ring any bells for you?) Freezing is basically the same as removing kinetic energy from particles and slowing particle systems down... this is why there is no lower temperature than absolute zero (-473 degrees Kelvin) because you can't go slower than not moving at all. Oh, wait, wait! That's cause I was thinking of ordinary old freezing, not the infinitely more awesome ELECTRO-ZAPIFYING!!
Last Edited By: perfidiousamber
11/24/09 12:43 AM.
Edited 1 times.
|
||
|
maadx |
|||
|
Posts: 5669 (11/24/09 12:37 AM) Registered user |
|
||
|
KellysMomCalledMeFine |
|||
|
Posts: 3843 (11/24/09 12:40 AM) Registered User |
KellysMomCalledMeFine wrote: |
||
|
Glamor Lohan |
|||
|
Posts: 417 (11/24/09 12:44 AM) |
Oh, wait, wait! That's cause I was thinking of ordinary old freezing, not the infinitely more awesome ELECTRO-ZAPIFYING!!You're losing it, darling... |
||
|
perfidiousamber |
|||
|
Posts: 753 (11/24/09 12:56 AM) Registered User |
  Sorry guys, but if anyone first pisses me off with their unadulterated nastiness and then has the incredibly ill-advised idea of trying to impress everyone
and cow me ( cow.. me.. duhhhh..) with their wondrous show of scientific knowledge, there is no way I can resist. Just be thankful I don't get into the
real quantum physics smackdown.
|
||
|
maadx |
|||
|
Posts: 5671 (11/24/09 1:00 AM) Registered user |
i dare you
so i can @ you actually doing it
DOUBLE DARE |
||
|
Glamor Lohan |
|||
|
Posts: 421 (11/24/09 1:20 AM) |
I dare you too, Amber! Go on, deliver the smackdown! Try to use words that people can understand instead of making up your own - we already have one Kathy
Najimy, you know.
|
||
|
perfidiousamber |
|||
|
Posts: 754 (11/24/09 1:44 AM) Registered User |
Try to use words that people can understand instead of making up your ownLook up any word I used in the last post in a dictionary. ( We are not talking about the awesome ELECTRO-ZAPIFYING!! of course) If you were talking about my most most wondrificacious words from my original tongue-in-cheek riposte (yeah go look that last one up in the dictionary, it's there) I think it's most amazingly clever of you to provide such an articulate and carefully plotted out response considering you didn't understand any of the words used. |
||
