YUM
New Poll
| Started By | Comment | ||
|---|---|---|---|
MidnightPrince69 |
|||
|
Is it wrong for me to be turned on by Natalie in her Pebbles dress?
YUM |
|||
OrsNaz |
|||
MidnightPrince69 wrote: It would be wrong for you to be turned on by Russell in Natalie's pebbles dress |
|||
crocophile |
|||
|
But...Russell wears the filthy Bam-bam undies with the Gymboree shorts
|
|||
craig |
|||
REWARD CHALLENGE No equivalent kudos to Mick for winning immunity. |
|||
JLK Name |
|||
craig wrote:Well Mick is boring! Natalie kinda outstands given the fact that she is the only girl remaining from Foa Foa and she's the nicest from the tribe but... she's still plain Jane |
|||
Rambler470 |
|||
|
Jeff has been talking Natalie up all year. Prettyy much it's been Russell, Shannon, Natalie and a bit of Laura. Mick has been Mr Invisible, but really
all he did was get lucky with an arrow. Natalie has hanging off the platform by her legs. It was pretty impressive. John's description of her in the
Insider was interesting. Apparently before TC Laura tried to swing a deal that Natalie saw right through.
|
|||
OrganicVeggies |
|||
|
More from reading these blogs, I see Mick as the winner of Samoa.
|
|||
NickF227 |
|||
OrganicVeggies wrote:....... But Jeff never even MENTIONS HIM. |
|||
Oowatanite |
|||
NickF227 wrote: Probst NEVER mentions winners he doesn't like. |
|||
Kirblar |
|||
|
In one of Erik or Laura's interviews one of them brought up someone "stealing" the win at FTC. I can imagine production would not be happy with
that if it's what occurs with Mick.
|
|||
Shred |
|||
Kirblar wrote:So one person may get all the votes? Good please be Natalie cause I know Laura does not vote for Russell. |
|||
round peg |
|||
|
kirblar what interview are you talking about???
|
|||
crocophile |
|||
|
Mick had Bob-ish face time in the recrap. Who knows?
|
|||
PrettyGoodYear1988 |
|||
|
I can see half these recruits just voting for Mick because he's a young handsome doctor and that's probably their image of what a Survivor winner
should be.
|
|||
Shred |
|||
PrettyGoodYear1988 wrote:This and it disturbs me. |
|||
Oowatanite |
|||
Shred wrote:Why ? Nobody's image of a surivor winner would be that of a despicable creepy misogynist troll like Russhole. |
|||
Shred |
|||
|
Why no Natalie love?
|
|||
Koan |
|||
Shred wrote: There's plenty of Natalie love, especially in Jeff's blogs. I still think she wins. The recap ended with Russell saying she won't win over him, and since this is at least the second time Russell has said that, it's probably misdirection and the outcome is in her favor. If Mick wins, Jeff must not care to write about him at all. |
|||
JaimeCat22 |
|||
|
Jeff trying to hype up Natalie in his blogs is the biggest clue that she wins. I don't remember him doing that with Susie or Cassandra or the other F3
losers.
I think sometimes when MB doesn't get the winner he wants, he just gives the winner a crappy edit and focuses on the big character of the season. It happened with Steph and Danni. It could be the same thing with Russell and Natalie. They decided to make the winner an afterthought and just give Russell all the screentime. |
|||
Koan |
|||
|
^ THIS. To be honest, I'm surprised Jeff is even giving Natalie credit since she has two x chromosomes.
|
|||