
| Started By | Comment | ||
|---|---|---|---|
XtremeInnovator420 |
|||
|
I mean, you can speak for yourself Eliza, but I'd rather take a "boring" pleasant person, over a horrible miserable and awful person who's
supposed to be entertaining any day. It's partly why I liked Jordan from BB11 and absolutely hated Jessie, Chima, and Natalie. Jordan may have been
"boring", but....at least she wasn't a miserable excuse for a person from what we were shown.
|
|||
OzarkSurvivor |
|||
|
Eliza, speaking of being excited to see Jerri again on HvV (I am too), have you ever met Jerri in person? What is she like?
While I'm on the topic, have you met many or few pre-ASS Survivors? Who are some of your favorites in real life (not on the show)? |
|||
Oowatanite |
|||
EOrlins wrote: To be fair, the editing has gone to shit over the last several seasons. It's hard to get a good reading on how boring or entertaining someone is when they don't get a decent edit. In the early seasons, pretty much everyone got at least a semi-decent edit and the visibility was split pretty reasonably among the players so we got a good sense of who they were. It really didn't matter how important to the endgame they were. Now we get Russhole being shoved down our throats by the editors. Russhole's the only one "playing hard" ? Just because he dominates the edit every week ? And how can we say others are not playing hard when we get such limited edits from them ? Russhole would have possibly made a good villain. Like Mariano. Or Hatch. Instead his Survivor "character" has been ruined by (a) the ridiculously visible and repetitive edit he's gotten and (b) the ridiculously easy-to-find HIIs that saved him over and over. |
|||
Thailandsurvivor |
|||
|
Yeah, really. An actual contestant on the show twice (especially Micronesia, one of the most biased edited seasons) should realize that the editors can shaft
whoever they want when putting the show together. Unless Eliza is trying to say that, for example, Julie was as boring as she came across on screen.
|
|||
craig |
|||
I like watching anyone who is playing the game and playing the game HARD. I think Russell is entertaining because he is thinking outside the box and actually TRYING.I agree. Russell is one my faves this season, even though I'm more of a Monica\Laura fan. 1) I always have a certain respect for the mastermind schemer. 2) Russell does think outside the box (looking for idols without a clue, etc) 3) The skewed editing is largely because of the unfortunate way the season played out. Russ has to get tons of airtime premege as the leader the the tribe always going to TC (think Steph). The other 3 Foas making merge are BORING, so Russ again is at the cente of the underdog comeback story. I'm far more annoyed at how Shambo was shoved down or throat at the expense of the other Galu. Go Villians in S20! |
|||
craig |
|||
the editors can shaft whoever they want when putting the show together.It's safe to say Natalie, Mick, and Jaison are boring, because they were in the perfect position to be huge stars. And the two guys got lots of talk time but were unmemorable. It's when a tribe rarely goes to TC, or when a player is surrounded by entertaining stars, that someone can be ignored without being boring. |
|||
craig |
|||
|
When and where was this taken?
|
|||
TRAINROBBER |
|||
Oowatanite wrote: I honestly think that Russell is the only one playing the game... I thought that John was but when he voted Laura out that pretty much sealed it for Russell, I think... unless Brett can come through in the IC I don't think anyone but Russell deserves the win... P. S. thank god Shambo is done... |
|||
EOrlins |
|||
XtremeInnovator420 wrote: See, that's where I totally disagree. Jordan wasn't boring at all. Jordan was hilarious!!! Her scene about telling time was one of my favorites of the season. She was both sweet AND entertaining. It has nothing to do with that. Natalie who was miserable was ALSO boring and annoying. Being awful doesn't make you entertaining and the reverse is also untrue. |
|||
EOrlins |
|||
Thailandsurvivor wrote: As I've said many times in the past, being "boring" on the show has nothing to do with being "boring" in real life. Julie and Leann are both fantastic examples of that since they are both funny, fun, entertaining, engaging, amazing people in real life, but it didn't come across on tv. I can only judge Survivor seasons as a viewer and when I make comments about people, yes, it is based on what I am seeing because honestly, I know Brett is awesome in real life (through a variety of ways), but based on what I've seen on the show, I couldn't say that in an analysis of the show because that's ridiculous. |
|||
EOrlins |
|||
craig wrote: This was at the party at the dodgeball charity event on Long Island last fall. It was a very fun event and I'm sad it isn't happening this year. |
|||
XtremeInnovator420 |
|||
|
Well, in fairness, I put the boring in quotations because people often refer to her as boring. I thought she was kind of entertaining. I was just saying
I'd rather take somebody like Brett or Kelly S, or Erik H or something over somebody like Corinne due to the facts stated above since I guess that's a
better example.
|
|||
Thailandsurvivor |
|||
EOrlins wrote: Leann was not boring. |
|||
Huntorr |
|||
|
I think dividing the tribes by gender makes it more difficult for people to stand out.
|
|||
JPOz |
|||
Huntorr wrote:No offense, disagree. Expanding game from 16 players to 18 or 20 without an increase of time to show the game reduces airtime which can be devoted to each player. Frankly wish if they continue to do 18 & 20 person seasons they figure out an appropriate way to increase challenges so they don't have double boot episodes, the challenges are spaced appropriately so a Dave Ball isn't limited to <24 hours to compete/scramble AND CBS increases airtime. Big Brother is shown 3 nights a week, why can't they toss in a few extra Survivor episodes for the seasons with larger casts? Yeah, yeah, yeah, advertising deals, tv time slot schedules...make it work people! |
|||
WylDawg |
|||
|
Please tell me you're kidding about the disdain over Natalie's win, Eliza.
|
|||
EOrlins |
|||
WylDawg wrote: Not kidding in the slightest. This is the most bitter jury in the history of Survivor. This is worse than Amber winning over Boston Rob. Russell outplayed them. Show some respect. Be an adult. Vote for the person who DESERVES to win. |
|||
WylDawg |
|||
|
And this has nothing to do with Natalie being a religious whackjob?
|
|||
agent2424 |
|||
|
Posts: 4763 (12/20/09 11:01 PM) Registered user |
EOrlins wrote:agreed! So Eliza.... what are your opinions on the Survivor 20 cast... I know you can't say much, and might not give much opinions but if will... 1. Who do you think Deserves to be on S20 (Choose any 16-20... that you would cast... not based on friendships but based on huge characters and people that deserve to be there.) 2. Out of the cast... who least deserves to be there (I assume I already know your answer) 3. Overall... are you happy or angry with the cast (since a lot of good people were left out) |
||
WylDawg |
|||
|
And no offense Eliza, but you went off twice on the final 2, you should know that emotions and how the final 2 treated people is a HUGE part of this game. And
I think you were justified both times BTW, just so we're clear.
|
|||