New Poll
| Started By | Comment | ||
|---|---|---|---|
 Jho |
|||
|
Posts: 463 (12/08/09 02:03 PM) Registered User |
Chinchilla23 wrote: You didn't even watch the show and you already know that? Wow |
||
|
GrenadeJumper85 |
|||
|
Posts: 14754 (12/08/09 02:09 PM) |
I know, right?
|
||
|
tomash |
|||
|
Posts: 1951 (12/08/09 02:10 PM) |
I'm sure Sandra and Parvati will both be amazing and own their haters. Again.
|
||
|
Oowatanite |
|||
|
Posts: 9603 (12/08/09 02:38 PM) Registered User |
GrenadeJumper85 wrote: If Sandra is the winner, I hope she at least plays the game and deserves it, unlike in PI where she was a slightly better winner choice than godawful Lill. |
||
|
mtj1282 |
|||
|
Posts: 3244 (12/08/09 05:30 PM) |
Oowatanite wrote: define "plays the game". Riding coat-tails has proven to be a successful stragey as more than one winner had at some point in there season riden coat-tails. |
||
|
mtj1282 |
|||
|
Posts: 3245 (12/08/09 05:32 PM) |
mtj1282 wrote: grrr stratedgy not stragey. what the hell happened to the edit button? |
||
|
JaimeCat22 |
|||
|
Posts: 119 (12/08/09 05:58 PM) |
Parvati's best bet is to use a similar strategy as last time, and own her gameplay at final TC. Unfortunately for her she won't have Amanda sitting
next to her this time.
Sandra will probably use a similar strategy to the one Natalie is using this season - smart social gameplay and let someone else take the heat from the jury. It's not a sexy strategy, but it works. Ultimately I think it will come down to a bitter jury, as it usually does in All-Star seasons, and the majority of the votes will go Sandra's way. In All-Star seasons it's usually the person who pisses off the fewest number of people that wins. |
||
|
Will |
|||
|
Posts: 35998 (12/08/09 08:18 PM) Amazing Race Moderator |
Dr Will Hatch two point oh wrote: 
|
||
 ilovekelly752 |
|||
|
Posts: 557 (12/08/09 08:32 PM) |
SU, by Parvati doing well in the challenges, do you mean like Amanda well, Kelly W. well, or Ozzy well?
|
||
|
AmightyRo |
|||
|
Posts: 1324 (12/08/09 09:04 PM) |
JaimeCat22 wrote:Well if you're only focusing on Survivor All Star seasons, theyre's only been 1.5, and Parvati pissed off way more people than Amanda and won. But I do get the feeling this jury will vote on emotions.  If Sandra pulls votes solely for being a mom then it'll be a big disappointment.
|
||
|
JVJrule |
|||
|
Posts: 3549 (12/08/09 09:30 PM) Registered user |
Amber is my fave Survivor ever and I had no problem watching her win. So screw it. If Parv wins because her two opponents curl over and die, I wouldn't
care. PARVOWNAGE!
|
||
|
Oowatanite |
|||
|
Posts: 9608 (12/08/09 10:53 PM) Registered User |
mtj1282 wrote: "Riding coattails" is a misnomer and an inaccurate description of the UTR strategy. Being nice and being useful at camp and being useful at tribe challenges and being part of the majority alliance within the tribe is NOT riding coattails. It may be a "boring" strategy but it is also a successful strategy. Winning because you get to the end against someone "despicable" should be the goal of every player. Sandra did not play the game very well. She was TERRIBLE at challenges but she was fortunate that her tribe won the first three ICs, allowing her to become part of the majority alliance in her tribe. This uselessness in challenges meant that EVERY other player was a target post-merge before she was. She was an "entertaining" player to watch, but she was a bad social player, constantly fighting with tribemates and opening her big mouth much too often. Her vote for Fairplay at the Rupert blindside TC was RIDICULOUS. Even though this stupid emotional vote didn't affect the outcome of that TC, the point is it could have affected the outcome. Booting T rather than Burton was also a dumb emotional error. She got to the endgame only because of Darrah's immunity run. Then she was fortunate that Lill decided that Sandra deserved the money over the villain Fairplay. |
||
|
speedyforme |
|||
|
Posts: 8246 (12/09/09 07:15 AM) Registered user |
Well Micronesia was diff because we had about 4 fans on the jury so the bitter "friends" jury wasn't really in play.
|
||
|
Serenity 808 |
|||
|
Posts: 1486 (12/09/09 08:08 AM) Registered user |
Interesting that Parvati is the immunity challenge whore. I wonder if she feels she's in such danger that she HAS to win those immunities, or else she
would have gone home.
|
||
|
dissimilis |
|||
|
Posts: 7464 (12/09/09 08:34 AM) Registered User |
As long as Sandra is her entertaining self and gets loud with people, she deserves to win as far as I am concerned. I could care less about her strategy,
though her flexibility on who the next boot should be definitely got her deep into the game and will probably help again this season.
|
||
|
JerseyJerk |
|||
|
Posts: 4435 (12/09/09 11:22 AM) Registered user |
It is Sandras game to loose if she IS in fact in the F3
|
||
|
Mypoody2 |
|||
|
Posts: 10734 (12/09/09 12:00 PM) Registered User |
Oowatanite wrote: ...you're an amber fan. |
||
|
CSCin3D |
|||
|
Posts: 13568 (12/09/09 01:24 PM) Registered user |
SERIOUSLY. |
||
|
Lexxan |
|||
|
Posts: 598 (12/09/09 03:00 PM) |
|
||
|
ilovekelly752 |
|||
|
Posts: 565 (12/09/09 04:14 PM) |
Oowatanite wrote:Terrible is a strong word. She struggled in some challenges, but she wasn't terrible. She also played a very good social game. She fought with Jon, but Jon fought with several people that season. It wasn't just her. Her vote for Jon would not have affected the outcome, because she expected there to be votes for Darrah without her vote. She knew she and Jon hated each other, so it makes sense to not vote for someone you expect is going to be on the jury, who doesn't already hate you. Voting out T was also smart, because she planned to join back up with Darrah, Jon, and Lill in the top six to vote out Christa and Sandra. When Christa did leave in 6th, she was able to turn the votes around to take out Burton, and controlled the game from there. If Burton won immunity in the top 5, Jon would've gone home. In the top 3, it was not luck that got her into the final 2. She and Jon both gave their reasons a to why they should be in the final two, and Lillian chose Sandra, and gave a lot of the reasons that Sandra told her. She also was a very observant player, who got along with almost everybody, and let everyone think she was on their side, as an extra vote they could use. This allowed her to save Rupert and blindside Trish, be the swing vote in the final 7, turn Burton and Lill against each other in the top 5, get Lill to tae her to the final two, and clean up the votes in the end. |
||
Message board courtesy of Survivor Sucks member support.
Benevolent dictatorship courtesy of Survivor Sucks Admin Idoits.
