
| Started By | Comment | ||
|---|---|---|---|
oobiedoobie |
|||
|
I don't like giving previous winners another million. I think they should spread the wealth around a bit more.
|
|||
Maniacboy888 |
|||
|
Seriously? Whether you like it or not, The winners were the best players and are the TRUE all-stars
|
|||
oobiedoobie |
|||
|
^^ that is true; I see what you are saying from a gaming point of view. It certainly is way more entertaining to watch the good players, like you said.
|
|||
DuckyLu |
|||
|
The only threepeaters I'm okay with are Stephenie, since she hasn't competed with a bunch of returnees before, and James since he was medevaced--though
I am not a big fan of either. I'd also be okay (love) Yau Man and Rob C. as threepeaters--okay to me because early boots--and Penner, because he was
medevaced.
I can see the argument for winners returning, but I'd rather have had them in an all winners season or winners v. some other group season. Much as I lovelovelove Cirie, having three people that were a strong alliance a few seasons back and got to the end is a big dud. And pleasepleaseplease let us not have to endure another final tribal council with Amanda. I only hope she will be booted early, or else it will be Recurring Nightmare season. |
|||
spnintendo |
|||
|
In a word, no.
Worst.decision.ever. |
|||
GnarlsInCharge |
|||
|
It's insane someone as useless as Colby or James is getting a 3rd try because fraus liked them when more interesting people like Sean R,Dreamz,Daughtery
and Katie haven't even had a 2nd chance.
|
|||
SleepTight |
|||
|
Parvati is nothing but a copy of Jenna M, I dislike both but would much rather see Jenna again.
|
|||
Art NL |
|||
|
I don't mind losers returning for a third time, but I do mind some of these losers returning for a third time. I wish they had included some of the early
boots from All Stars or Micronesia like Tina Wesson, Rob C, Yau-Man, Ami, Jonathan rather than Amanda and James again.
|
|||
DuckyLu |
|||
|
The second time they play it is interesting to see how it will be when they come back--are they any different? did they learn anything? But the third time it
is like they are some sort of professional Survivor players. That's what I don't like--at least in theory. I hope it plays out better than I'm
imagining.
|
|||
ncassaro |
|||
Art NL wrote:Cause they're Beckys! Nearly identical Beckys all the way! Lecy's the one you used to see from 88 to 93! But Sarah came and took her place because she had a similar face! What a lovely pair! lmao Roseanne <3 |
|||
Katy Carney |
|||
|
Most of the people I'm excited to see again are threepeaters. Jerri, Stephenie, Parvati, Rob M. and Colby, Cirie and Rupert to an extent. Compared to
like...Randy, Tyson, JT, Courtney and Danielle...yah I'm fine with the threepeaters. Thank God for them, really.
|
|||
Ooga Ooga |
|||
|
I can go along with people returning for a second chance in an All Stars show.
But twice is enough. Three times is just too sad and I can't imagine wanting to watch someone who has lost twice coming bact to try for a third time. The saddest thing is when people who have won or who have made a big splash for themselves via their big mouth think they can win on a return engagement. These people are almost always voted out right quick. I mean, can you imagine Russel the mouth coming back for an All Stars show? He would definitely be voted out ASAFP and I'm sure that everyone would know why. The only thing I would like to see in All Star shows is trying a former contestant as the host. Surely one of them could do a better job than Jiffy and it would be so delicious to see him replaced by a former contestant. If any of the producers are reading this, PLEASE? PLEASE? PLEASE? |
|||
tomash |
|||
|
Steph, Rupert, Colby, Jerri, Boston Rob etc are people that the casual audience remembers, and might make them want to tune in to watch. It's all about
ratings.
|
|||
CrystalOwnage |
|||
|
I don't mind threepeaters.
James and Amanda didn't deserve to be on, though. |
|||
Cyberball2072 |
|||
|
If this is TRUELY a Survivor HEROS VS VILLAINS I am suprised that Lex was not on the cast, he came off quite the villain in All Stars. Shii Ann, as much as I
hate her, is one of the more hated people, not just by the fans, but also by former Survivors as well and I think she should have been on the list.
As always, too many 'recent' survivors and not enough old-school Survivors. |
|||
JLK Name |
|||
tomash wrote:True. That's why they deserved to play for the 3rd time CrystalOwnage wrote:Jeff likes James and james was evacuated so maybe thats why MB approves his 3peat. Amanda was in the finals twice in a row and she hooks up with Ozzy. kinda worthy. |
|||
Huntorr |
|||
|
It's a good idea to bring people back for the third time, but it's too soon after the last All-Stars season. It seems desperate.
|
|||
JLK Name |
|||
Huntorr wrote:I know right! They broke the 7-seasons gap! A new All-Star season should have been in S24 |
|||
xena321 |
|||
|
People who deserve to be there for a 3rd time:
Rupert Colby Jerri Stephenie Cirie (They are all well known and fan favs) Maybe: Rob M. James Parvati No: Amanda I would of prefered if they brought back alot more winners and runner-ups, the first one had 4 winners, 1 runner-up, but theres been 19 seasons, so they could try and get at least half. |
|||
Huntorr |
|||
CrystalOwnage wrote: I agree. We just saw them on back to back seasons. I'm still sick of them. If they don't vote Amanda off first just to make sure she doesn't make it 39 Days AGAIN, I'll be pissed. |
|||