Thailandsurvivor wrote:Yes, and the fact that all three knew that they had a better shot of winning against Jon rather than themselves, definately contributed to this.
Lexxan wrote:
Sandra can answer that.
"We can beat Jon, because Jon is like a girl"
Darrah was an Immunity whore. She easily would have won that F3 challenge, and she probably would've beat Lill and Jon in the Finals. I'm not sure she would have beat Sandra, but Darrah definately would have voted out Sandra at F3, and it was Sandra's goal from Day One was to get in the Final 2 and go home with at least 100K. So, All three of them had their motives to vote Darrah out over Lill, Sandra or Jon.
That's why Burton left over him.
All three girls despised Jon. This is especially true for Sandra and Lill, two very emotional players. They hated his guts. Not only did he manage to convince them both to vote for Darrah, he got Darrah to vote for Lill. He had no business making the final three, yet he got there without a vote to his name without winning immunity.
Jon most likely would've won F4 immunity, if it weren't so rigged towards the Jury. (I mean, 4 Individuals vs a group of 5 people? That's very, very rigged)
You know, I like HIIs, but only if they add something to the gameplay. I hate the HII in Panama, Gabon and Cook Islands, since it dragged its owners to the Finals, whereas I liked the HIIs in Fiji and Micronesia because they were played and had a huge impact in the game (other than dragging one individual to the end, which is lame and boring). I also hate HIIs like in China or Samoa, where the simply become the Season's main focus, without Clues and in the end get more attention that some of the contestants *cough* Brett - Kelly - Sherea - Ashley *cough* (Getting Rid of James and is 2 HIIs and Russell finding HIIs are the most important storylines of China and Samoa)
(This was for SJ, not JSB)
