PS: I'm American, please use inches.

| Started By | Comment | ||
|---|---|---|---|
SonOfAbraxas |
|||
|
And exactly how long does this "cruel kindness" of yours measure?
PS: I'm American, please use inches. |
|||
Charming Nemesis |
|||
|
Depends on how kind I'm feeling.
|
|||
Aunt Pappy |
|||
|
The sexual tension between SOA and Vicc is....well....kind of scary.
|
|||
SonOfAbraxas |
|||
|
Oh ... you'll be feeling so kind you're gonna feel like a freakin' saint that died and went to heaven. Trust me.
:winknudgehint PS: OMG WHY IS THE KRAUTHAMMER SAYING OBAMA GAVE HIS BEST SPEECH ON FOREIGN SOIL TODAY?!?!? Oh. Wait. There it is. The bar was set very low. Oh ... that krauthammer. Always good for a chuckle. |
|||
SonOfAbraxas |
|||
|
Hey! AUNT POOPY! SHUT YER GAPING COCKHOLE!
(It's not "scary" ... it's super hawt. Admit it. Rawr.) |
|||
Charming Nemesis |
|||
|
MY CHARM KNOWS NO BOUNDS!
It's a curse... |
|||
factoryhurl |
|||
|
Charming Nemesis wrote: You have to be cruel to be kind, in the right measure.
Last Edited By: factoryhurl
12/10/09 06:42 PM.
Edited 1 times.
|
|||
SonOfAbraxas |
|||
|
Umm ... this is the Obama Sucks thread. Go find the YouTube thread.
|
|||
B DeBrun |
|||
Eagles Z Frodo Mt Doom wrote: of course this gets 1/1,000,000 the play Bush's upside book gets |
|||
B DeBrun |
|||
RazorrzzEdge |
|||
SonOfAbraxas wrote:hot as a siberian ice cube |
|||
sealbach |
|||
|
so who here is willing to pay 10% more in taxes for obamacare?
i need a dumbshit list, please. |
|||
Bonestripper |
|||
|
Last Edited By: Bonestripper
12/10/09 09:47 PM.
Edited 1 times.
|
|||
squashthebeef |
|||
|
Fuck you Bonestripper. Beat me to it.
|
|||
Charming Nemesis |
|||
Bush closes the gapPublic Policy Polling:
|
|||
Trixie Delight |
|||
|
Jsyk, Pappy's gaping cockhole is considered one of the 7 Wonders of the World.
I'm hearing the latest polls for Obamacare are running 60% or so against now. Just wait until everyone gets a load of these numbers. Health care's missing millionsLast Updated: 4:32 AM, December 11, 2009 Posted: 2:37 AM, December 11, 2009 The Democrats' sweeping health-care plans may bankrupt the nation, but every American will be insured. Except for 24 million of 'em. No kidding: The Congressional Budget Office figures that by 2019, long after the new programs kick in, the reforms will trim the ranks of the uninsured by just 57 percent -- leaving another 43 percent, or 24 million residents, without coverage. And for this, Americans will have to cough up an extra $1 trillion over 10 years, starting next year (and $2.5 trillion in the 10 years following 2014, when the programs' benefits start going out). For months, critics (like us) have cited ObamaCare's many horrors -- its massive job-killing taxes, the toll it'll take on seniors, its possibly fatal blow to the federal budget, the unmanageable burden it'll place on hospitals and doctors (not to mention their patients) . . . But even if Americans are willing to endure such enormous pain, it's worth asking: Just what will they get in return? Apparently, not much. CBO estimated that Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid's bill will boost the share of Americans with coverage from about 81 to 92 percent by 2019. But as Jeffrey Anderson noted on these pages recently, "only 5 percent of Americans are uninsured and making less than the median income" and "many among that 5 percent are already eligible for government programs." In other words, Dems envision turning America's health-care system on its head, threatening the economy and the federal budget -- all so as to cover the few percentage points of the population that can't afford coverage right now. Again, despite the huge sacrifices by most Americans, tens of millions will remain uninsured, even after ObamaCare. What, may we ask, is the point? |
|||
factoryhurl |
|||
|
an op-ed piece from the ny post that is being c&p'd on blogs?
|
|||
B DeBrun |
|||
Charming Nemesis wrote: See previous page :) |
|||
B DeBrun |
|||
factoryhurl wrote: Maybe you would prefer this opinion: http://www.cbo.gov/publications/collections/health.cfm |
|||
youfist |
|||
"I think that nobody is above the law. If there are specific assertions of executive privilege, then, you know, those can be examined. But I think this notion, this blanket notion that you can't subpoena White House aides, where there's evidence of genuine wrongdoing, I think is completely misguided. "You know, as I recall, Richard Nixon mounted similar arguments. That's not how we operate. We're a nation of laws and not men and women. So, you know -- and my -- that's a precedent I don't mind living with as president of the United States."-Obama 2008 ^^^ Referring to congressional hearings on the gate-crasher incident, presidential press secretary Robert Gibbs said: "I think, you know, that, based on separation of powers, staff here don't go to testify in front of Congress." |
|||