| Started By | Comment | ||
|---|---|---|---|
 SuperJude |
|||
|
Posts: 15695 (12/11/09 12:13 PM) Registered user |
Then again, maybe he makes F3. It's possible, it really is. They could run the "challenge only Russell can win" challenge at F4, something like
find something under a bridge, then rape some animals, then have the worst fucking back acne ever. He could win that. Whatever happened to "strong"
Russell in challenges, anyway?
-SJ™ |
||
|
JPOz |
|||
|
Posts: 346 (12/11/09 12:19 PM) |
SuperJude wrote: Not a great idea to design the IC's for Russell to win, that would eliminate the greatest tribal council moments ever when Russell decides to play, not-play, wear or scratch his ass with the latest HII hidden in his right nostril. |
||
|
SGD |
|||
|
Posts: 25 (12/11/09 12:26 PM) |
SuperJude wrote: At 5 he can easily argue everybody on the jury hates me I am the reason they're sitting there and not here, why would they give me a million bucks and everyone would buy it. |
||
|
SuperJude |
|||
|
Posts: 15697 (12/11/09 12:28 PM) Registered user |
Never discount the Bitter Jury aspect of the game. You get 2 kinds of juries, the ones where they respect gameplay over everything else and those that are
bitter. This is shaping up to be the latter.
-SJ™ |
||
|
JPOz |
|||
|
Posts: 348 (12/11/09 12:40 PM) |
SuperJude wrote:No disrespect but I think people who refuse to vote Russell cause of his lies about money/occupation aren't necessarily being bitter, depending on how much they know about what's he's said in the game. |
||
|
Lianimal |
|||
|
Posts: 1 (12/11/09 12:42 PM) |
SuperJude wrote:Ugh....yeah. He would have been okay with the jury, I think, except for the three bitter bitches. The guys would most likely respect his game. I really hated him at first, but he's grown on me since the merge. |
||
|
SGD |
|||
|
Posts: 26 (12/11/09 01:09 PM) |
SuperJude wrote:Exactly, so for Russell the bitter jury angle is an easy sell to the end game. There's like 6 Galus there all done in by him save Eric. |
||
|
lawnmunchkin |
|||
|
Posts: 433 (12/11/09 01:22 PM) Registered user |
SGD wrote:According to the insider videos, Russell is claiming responsibility for every boot except for Yasmin - since he wasn't there - but he claims, if he was, he would have been responsible for that one too. He's a cocky SOB that's for sure. |
||
|
aboutbreakingrules |
|||
|
Posts: 889 (12/11/09 01:59 PM) |
Beefcake wrote:Many a time, under-the-radar works (just ask Amber). Might not get you past the finish line, but it's progress. Big moves? Depends on what you do when and around whom. If being a Natalie or Mick is what it takes to make sure you get as deep as possible into the game, as opposed to being a bold power player, then do it. |
||
|
Beefcake |
|||
|
Posts: 5079 (12/11/09 02:41 PM) Registered User |
This is exactly the idiotic attitude that I'm complaining about.
I am WATCHING the show, not playing it. I don't care who wins. I want to be entertained. UTR players are not entertaining. Therefore, UTR players are a curse to this game. I want to see the monkeys DO something while they dance across my new 40" HDTV. |
||
|
LaurenTheLush |
|||
|
Posts: 4988 (12/11/09 02:48 PM) |
Just because someone is boring to you, doesn't mean they aren't entertaining to others.
|
||
|
Beefcake |
|||
|
Posts: 5081 (12/11/09 02:54 PM) Registered User |
I don't care. This is about ME! I want to be entertained!
Do you really want to watch 20 Bretts??? Do you??? |
||
|
LaurenTheLush |
|||
|
Posts: 4991 (12/11/09 02:56 PM) |
Well if it was 20 Bretts, maybe he'd finally get some fucking airtime.
|
||
|
Beefcake |
|||
|
Posts: 5083 (12/11/09 02:59 PM) Registered User |
No, he wouldn't. We'd just see them walking quietly around camp, interspersed with shots of the chicken and some crabs. Nothing would ever happen.
It would be like watching "Heroes", only on Thursdays. |
||
|
SuperJude |
|||
|
Posts: 15708 (12/12/09 01:04 AM) Registered user |
Beefcake wrote:Amazing analogy considering Russell is the Sylar of this season. You know, the guy that should be amazing in their own right save for the fact that the monkeys running the show have no clue how to portray him so they go with quantity over quality. -SJ™ |
||
|
blistering |
|||
|
Posts: 6946 (12/12/09 02:18 AM) Registered user |
lawnmunchkin wrote:Oh yeah? I guess he forgot about Ben, the boot he didn't want but had to go along with according to his confessionals. |
||
|
JPOz |
|||
|
Posts: 354 (12/12/09 02:23 AM) |
Well he's responsible for Boreassi's death but he had nothin to do with Russell S's death, that was Natalie's handiwork. And Erik boot was
Natalie's work too. But he can't give a woman credit, they only there to be yelled at and bullied.
|
||
|
SuperJude |
|||
|
Posts: 15716 (12/12/09 02:32 AM) Registered user |
See that's the thing, you need to let others decide that you made a lot of moves and played the hardest game, especially with a Bitter Jury. By being bossy
and letting everybody know he thinks he played the hardest, he will likely drive people away because nobody wants to be told how you pwn3d them.
I think Galu has the fix in and Russell will not win this season no matter what he does. -SJ™ |
||
 LOLABINGO |
|||
|
Posts: 8022 (12/12/09 02:44 AM) |
I agree.
|
||
|
JPOz |
|||
|
Posts: 355 (12/12/09 02:46 AM) |
SuperJude wrote:Agree. Lying is implicitly disrespectful but also part of the game and someone who's done it well can ask and may get respected for doing it well enough to advance to finals...but they won't give him respect AND a million bucks if he's also been rude, insulting, etc. I think the wealth thing seals the deal, and I wouldn't call the jury bitter over that. It's one thing to lie about a dead grandmother to win a reward or lie that Dave was plotting against you to help sway a vote. But to build your relationships on a lie about being a disaster victim....then reveal you actually have reaped enormous benefit from that disaster...he deserves to have people refuse to vote for him. |
||
Message board courtesy of Survivor Sucks member support.
Benevolent dictatorship courtesy of Survivor Sucks Admin Idoits.
