It didn't even dawn on me but seeing as how last night was all about what the jury thinks and who you are going to vote for I think we can look at this.
What if Russell doesn't get a single vote
but then wouldn't that just go with Stephen who played the game so well, made all the right decisions and went to the end with three people who would have taken him to the final two....and yet he didn't get a single vote. Every single person on that jury voted for the guy who won challenges and not the mastermind you can go all the way back to Kelly and Colby and know that winning challenges doesn't mean winning votes.
So that would be twice in a row that the person who ......
Come to think about it, who was the biggest player in Gabon....was Sugar. If you crossed Sugar at any point in the game she eliminanted you. Someone says they are thinking of stealing your idol....bye Ace, we don't want you as an onion see ya later Charlie Randy and Corinne, be mean to Matt bye Kenny and Crystal. Like Stephen and now like Russell Sugar sent the most people home and she to made it to the end and she to didn't get a single vote.
So is this the new trend?
If Russell makes it to the end and doesn't get a single vote how long could this go on for?
What does this tell you about the past seasons of survivor... perhaps the 3rd place "masterminds" like Lex and Rob C. might have still been 3rd place even if they did make it to the end.
How would you feel if not a single jury member voted for Russell?








