platoshrimp wrote:
Bonestripper if i were a creationist, i would be pointing to one flawed study about evolution and say "see, this proves entire evolution is wrong", or keep saying "where's the fossil record!!! where's the gaps!!!"What do you mean if? you're a follower of the global warming church. Your religion was created from thin (a pun you wont get) air
I just hate it when they make those false statements with no facts, like when they accuse someone of having some religion based on climate change.
BTW,
http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5gRa5F7Lv_zO0ZKaHmbQENlyV3KdgD9CHPLC00AP IMPACT: Science not faked, but not prettyLONDON - E-mails stolen from climate scientists show they stonewalled skeptics and discussed hiding data - but the messages don't support claims that the science of global warming was faked, according to an exhaustive review by The Associated Press.
Amazing, the AP put 5 reporters on this task, less than half the number that were used to "fact check" Sarah Palin's book. And despite their deep scientific backgrounds the reporters were completely wrong when it came to what "Mike's Nature Trick" was referring to.
For any lib who actually wants to enlighten themselves (yeah I know, fat chance of that) here's a link to what Mike's Nature Trick was really trying to hide...
American Thinker: Understanding Climategate's Hidden Decline
What do you want to bet that those five AP fact checkers turned to Climate Change proponents to explain things to them, rather than skeptics?









