All Hail bangabong & Al Gore! Scientific Super Geniuses! in Off Topic Forum

0 Points

All Hail bangabong & Al Gore! Scientific Super Geniuses!

Started By	Comment
UrbanSprawl		#161	[-]
Posts: 3691 (12/13/09 06:08 PM) Just ignore me Reply Quote More Recent Posts	Last night I lay in bed looking up at the stars in the sky and I thought to myself, where the heck is the ceiling. Remove this ad Are big businesses hysterical? No. It's all about the bottom-line. They're spending hundreds of millions on marketing and also on government. They're spending hundreds of millions to convince society that 1) science is a religion, 2) moving the scientific debate from how quickly and deeply will the environmental impact be to whether there will be any impact whatsoever, and 3) creating a network that builds-up outliers and misinformation and marginalizes major science institutions to leave the populace as unintelligent and uninformed on the matter as possible.
DelosWorld		#162	[-]
Posts: 1959 (12/13/09 06:25 PM) Reply Quote More Recent Posts	UrbanSprawl wrote: Archimedes wrote: UrbanSprawl wrote: Your article also provided a link. Which links to this information: That link is to a story from 2004. The link contained data spanning into 2007 and 2008 and perhaps into 2009. And the science isn't settled. Scientists are questioning how long until the US's bread basket becomes a sand basket? How badly will drought conditions be exacerbated? How badly will extinction trends be exacerbated? how badly will disease be exacerbated? Etc. What they're not asking is, will the radical increase in carbon pollution have no impact on our environment? If the science isn't settled why can't increased CO2 concentrations make things better? Or at least some things? Are scientists biased to only hypothesize about negative effects?
TequilaVaquero		#163	[-]
Posts: 5322 (12/13/09 07:20 PM) Registered User Reply Quote More Recent Posts	How many carbon offsets would you like to buy UC? You need to minimize your carbo footprint. If you don't buy carbon offets, the world will explode!
PoChop		#164	[-]
Posts: 3039 (12/13/09 07:26 PM) Registered user Reply Quote More Recent Posts	The science isn't settled? WTF?
airshowpilot		#165	[-]
Posts: 2182 (12/13/09 07:27 PM) Registered user Reply Quote More Recent Posts
Archimedes		#166	[-]
Posts: 1378 (12/13/09 07:44 PM) Divides by zero Reply Quote More Recent Posts	PoChop wrote: The science isn't settled? WTF? It must be... That's why the Associated Press only assigned the ClimateGate emails 5 fact checkers and assigned Sarah Palin's book 11. http://thevimh.blogspot.com/2009/12/going-rogue-11-climategate-5.html
squashthebeef		#167	[-]
Posts: 24219 (12/13/09 07:47 PM) Found a guy with a cat on his head Kinda blurry Could be anything Reply Quote More Recent Posts	Are scientists biased to only hypothesize about negative effects? Nobody is going to fund research that proves everything is okeydokey. Armageddon sells.
WiscBadger95		#168	[-]
Posts: 15982 (12/13/09 07:52 PM) Registered user Reply Quote More Recent Posts	UrbanSprawl wrote: I've explained carbon pollution and its effects a hundred times over on this board. I could also explain the corporate marketing surrounding climate change if you want me to. So, CO2, the stuff plants need to survive, is "pollution"?
Archimedes		#169	[-]
Posts: 1379 (12/13/09 07:55 PM) Divides by zero Reply Quote More Recent Posts	WiscBadger95 wrote: UrbanSprawl wrote: I've explained carbon pollution and its effects a hundred times over on this board. I could also explain the corporate marketing surrounding climate change if you want me to. So, CO2, the stuff plants need to survive, is "pollution"? Then so is everything that comes out of US's mouth....
WiscBadger95		#170	[-]
Posts: 15983 (12/13/09 07:56 PM) Registered user Reply Quote More Recent Posts	Last night I lay in bed looking up at the stars in the sky and I thought to myself, where the heck is the ceiling. Remove this ad squashthebeef wrote: Are scientists biased to only hypothesize about negative effects? Nobody is going to fund research that proves everything is okeydokey. Armageddon sells. The sky is falling!!! The sky is falling!!!
PoChop		#171	[-]
Posts: 3042 (12/13/09 08:14 PM) Registered user Reply Quote More Recent Posts	Isn't water vapor a pollutant? It has a much larger greenhouse effect than carbon2O. In it's liquid form H2O can cause drowning!
TequilaVaquero		#172	[-]
Posts: 5324 (12/13/09 08:22 PM) Registered User Reply Quote More Recent Posts	squashthebeef wrote: Are scientists biased to only hypothesize about negative effects? Nobody is going to fund research that proves everything is okeydokey. Armageddon sells. EXTRA EXTRA!!! THERE AIN'T SHIT GOING ON!!!
WiscBadger95		#173	[-]
Posts: 15984 (12/13/09 09:02 PM) Registered user Reply Quote More Recent Posts	Oh my God!! Oh my God!! Dihydrogen Monoxide is going to kill us all!! DHMO.org
B DeBrun		#174	[-]
Posts: 22696 (12/13/09 10:51 PM) Reply Quote More Recent Posts	at Arch pulverizing UC
bob2559		#175	[-]
Posts: 6292 (12/13/09 11:01 PM) Cat Diddler Reply Quote More Recent Posts	What's really funny is that UC thinks he won the debate.
AllMenAreIslands		#176	[-]
Posts: 25922 (12/14/09 01:08 PM) Registered user Reply Quote More Recent Posts	UrbanSprawl wrote: The amount of carbon pollution in our environment is a measurable phenomenon. The effects of this air pollution is a measurable phenomena. And the results of continued pollution is a highly predictable phenomena. You don't have to be a genius to understand this. I could explain global warming for the millionth time in this thread (oh no, WiscBadger will call me out for being dumb), but I'll save you the time and knowledge (unless you want me to explain it again). Air pollution is quite QUITE different from climate change, whether to cooler or warmer temperatures. You're confusing "weather" with "climate." And since the rate at which climate change occurs is over such a long period of time, the Al Gorebots had to manufacture, distort, hide and generally present fraudulent data to support their hysterical claims for catastrophic climate change due to man's activities. They're wrong about climate change. Did you want them to be right?
AllMenAreIslands		#177	[-]
Posts: 25923 (12/14/09 01:28 PM) Registered user Reply Quote More Recent Posts	Pahrump Mania wrote: If global warming is a threat to the planet then why wasn't all of the stimulus spending directed towards building nuclear power plants? Jobs would have been created, CO2 emissions would have been dratically reduced, and the people who are actually going to pay for Stimulus, future generations, would have benefitted. Because the windfall cash cow that is Cap & Trade is intended to (a) pay for emergency expenses right now, and (b) help keep the wars in Iraq, Afghanistan and wherever else humming along. And that's why the reveal of the fraudulent data is only the start, not the end, of the process of undoing the damage done by the giant scam that is Catastrophic Man-Made Climate Change. Just because we all know now that the sheeple were so easily fooled into believing the claptrap doesn't mean the battle is over. Now everyone needs to comprehend the essential driving-force that prompted government to put the pressure on the scientists to come up with data "any way they can" in the first place. edirted to clarify Last Edited By: AllMenAreIslands 12/14/09 01:32 PM. Edited 1 times.
PassionatePiscesMan		#178	[-]
Posts: 8885 (12/14/09 01:39 PM) Registered User Reply Quote More Recent Posts	Danger High Impedance
Archimedes		#179	[-]
Posts: 1386 (12/14/09 04:17 PM) Divides by zero Reply Quote More Recent Posts	Oh my gosh! The sun melts glaciers? Who woulda thunk it? Sunshine speeded 1940s Swiss glacier melt: scientists GENEVA (AFP) - A surge in sunshine more than 60 years ago helped Swiss mountain glaciers melt faster than today, even though warmer average temperatures are being recorded now, Swiss researchers said Monday. Their study into the impact of solar radiation on Alpine glaciers made the "surprising discovery" that in the 1940s, and especially summer 1947, the ice floes lost the most ice since measurements begin 95 years ago, according to Zurich's Federal Institute of Technology (ETHZ). But isn't the science settled on this? Don't we already know everything there is to know about the complex climate of our planet and how it changes over eons?
Vegazguy		#180	[-]
Posts: 22411 (12/14/09 05:34 PM) 10 per day, bitches! Reply Quote More Recent Posts	Last night I lay in bed looking up at the stars in the sky and I thought to myself, where the heck is the ceiling. Remove this ad uc is a retard.

<< Previous Topic Next Topic >>

Yuku free message boards

All Hail bangabong & Al Gore! Scientific Super Geniuses!