TequilaVaquero wrote:
If we're just going to agree to disagree, and not compare people from different seasons, why are we even posting here?
We don't come here to be respectful and listen to other's opinions, we come here to tell everyone who doesn't agree with us to eat shit!
Okay than eat shit or whatever. It's not that I don't enjoy a good argument when there's one to be had - it's just that when there isn't, I learned long ago that when an argument on the internet is going downhill, it really is pointless to keep going unless you really want to get base, personal, and use all kinds of logical fallacies. It doesn't make much sense to me, and obviously we have very different criteria as far as what we find entertaining.
Logic does not apply when being entertained by one contestant over another is a completely subjective preference. I will agree that Ozzy was entertaining in challenges, but if you still want to argue the Ozzy strategy angle, I'll bite. Why would you consider throwing a challenge to get rid of a tribe member a strategy? And, do you see this as a good strategy?














