Yuku free message boards

Seems to me the Mick supporters are pretty quiet here, almost having to apologize about Mick being their winner pick or add a disclaimer that they aren't sure Mick is winning (like I have). Even Blake has said that lately and he still gets reamed for wanting to defend his pick. Blake has been put on the defensive many times, it makes anyone supporting Mick not want to even post here!
That's not what this board should be about. Natalie supporters are much more aggressive in Edgic as of late. Many have her already winning and are demanding Edgic guidelines be changed because of that. If they can be so sure Natalie wins, why can't anyone defend Mick being their winner pick if they want to? A few picking Russell are equally adament their pick wins and seem to be laughing about Mick even being considered. I am not pointing a finger at the majority here, just some of the posters who know who they are and shall remain nameless. :)

If there are spoilers out there and that's why some of this is going on, I will be ticked. I am here to do Edgic, I do not want to be spoiled or have pop in posters making suspicious fly by remarks ridiculing other posters because of what they think they know. Seems a certain band wagon has been getting heavily loaded lately, that's all I will say.

Since Blake came back he has been behaving pretty well and has a right to defend his pick and not apologize for it. That is what others were complaining about with him a few weeks ago, now it's some on the other side doing it to him. I feel like I should be sorry I am picking Mick when I read posts here, like I am making a huge mistake and I'm not sure why that is. Mick hasn't been invisible, he hasn't been OTTN, he hasn't killed a baby, he hasn't been too OTTP....so he should still be considered a winner pick by some who think he can win according to Edgic and how they perceive it. I can't think of a better thing for him than to be shown as the only possible anti Russell Foa Foa player, struggling with his doubts of sticking with an alliance that includes "the snake" Russell, and his loyalty that has been there with Foa Foa since the beginning. If the jury dislikes Russell, would they not give Mick some credit for that? Maybe they would, none of you can say they would not since you can't possibly know for sure. I also think that has been part of his story, his struggle all through the game, trying to take it one day at a time and hanging in there without complaining. He is not as closely associated with negative,evil Russell as Jaison and Natalie are....if it were Natalie saying what Mick has been saying (about Russell) she would be getting applause for it.

I have given credit to those defending their picks other than Mick and meant it. I think we all deserve that respect here, no one should be ridiculed for picking Mick because they feel Natalie has more story and vice versa. Natalie's story is solely connected to Russell, is that really going to make her the winner? It could, but there are still those three bad episodes in the beginning that make her Edgic chances not so good IMO. GR has made good points for Natalie but is also decent about it and not acting like he's one hundred percent sure it's her. Some people here could learn from GR and others who make good points about their winner pick while respecting other's choices for winner. Oo's brief posts are starting to look good to me...I never thought I'd say that! Okay, I am back to being UTR Abby. PS: I can't wait for Cindi to name names Sunday night, if anyone should get bashed here it's Edgic posters who read spoilers and deny it. No one deserves bashing just because they picked Mick to win, he has had a better EDGIC edit than Natalie and Russ, just saying....