she win!
Natalie White: She will join Jenna Morasca, Danni Boatwright and Parvati Shallow as the 4th "hot woman" to win Survivor and will most definitely be asked back for a future all-star season.

New Poll
| Started By | Comment | ||
|---|---|---|---|
rbk32 |
|||
|
Posts: 601 (12/20/09 05:07 PM) Registered user |
she win! |
||
JaimeCat22 |
|||
|
Jeff gave it away when he said "I thought all we had this season was Russell and nothing else." Meaning Russell and a crappy winner.
|
|||
Kirblar |
|||
ZombieLinda wrote:This actually scares me into thinking Mick wins. >< |
|||
craig |
|||
|
Jeff talked up Bob and JT plenty in bis blogs too.
He also hated Gabon, but it didn't mean that Susie won. |
|||
soph101 |
|||
JaimeCat22 wrote:Not really. It's a pretty boring cast if we're bieng honest: Brett, Natalie (he labelled both of them dull), Mick, Kelly and all those insignificant others. Big characters got voted off early, and it probably would have been a dull season were it not for Russell, as much as it kills me to admit. Plus any winner who's name isn't Russell would have been a dissapointment for Jeff. Jumping the gun a little, don't you think? |
|||
Oowatanite |
|||
|
Russell Hantz: Like him or not, he will go down as the greatest player of all time. Period. Mick Trimming: He'll take his money, marry his fiancée, and will most likely never be asked back on Survivor. Natalie White: She will join Jenna Morasca, Danni Boatwright and Parvati Shallow as the 4th "hot woman" to win Survivor and will most definitely be asked back for a future all-star season. Jaison Robinson: He will be regarded as one of the most well-spoken winners and will be remembered for his keeping his integrity intact while playing a very dirty game. Brett Clouser: As nice as he is, people will not remember Brett, Brett will not be asked back again, and Brett probably won't care.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|||
craig |
|||
And I guess since Amber's a mother now, she no longer is a "hot" winner.Danni's a mother too. So either he doesn't dig Amber, or he thinks that Romber won ASS. |
|||
LibrasAbandonedChild1 |
|||
|
Didn't I hear that Jeff isn't enthusiastic/doesn't like this season's winner? I thought I read that in here once. If so, Mick's got it in
the bag.
|
|||
Koan |
|||
LibrasAbandonedChild1 wrote: As far as I remember, Jeff hasn't said he disliked the winner. He has called plenty of people in this cast boring/dull, but the spotlight has been on Russell sprinkled with not-so-subtle praise for Natalie. If Natalie is a quiet Becky/Cassandra F3 loser, I don't see why Jeff would put the energy to write about her unless she wins. We'll all know in an hour, the 10-minute season recap in the finale will give it away. |
|||
percadans |
|||
Oowatanite wrote:No, it means Jeff has good taste. |
|||
Jho |
|||
|
Posts: 475 (12/21/09 09:16 PM) Registered User |
Jeff Probst blogs about 'Survivor' finale: 'Nobody outplayed Russell'
by Jeff Probst Categories: Reality TV, Survivor Okay, now that the show is officially over I'm going to take off my hosting and producing hat and just give you my personal reaction to what went down last night. I think Russell was the victim of a jury of bitter people. I am not taking anything away from Natalie, she clearly did a great job of reading the group dynamic of the jury and as a result she deserves the money. Oftentimes on Survivor, the vote does come down to a choice where a determining factor is "how nice someone is" but that's usually when all other criteria being considered is equal. That doesn't hold up this season. This season was so lopsided in terms of one person (Russell) completely dominating the game that to not give him the money and the title is a bit silly. If I were playing Survivor, no matter how much I despised someone, if they kicked my ass in the game I would give it to them. Period. Outwit. Outplay. Nobody outwitted or outplayed Russell. Not even close. I was a bit surprised at Eric's nod to Natalie during the final tribal council. I think he certainly helped Natalie and definitely hurt Russell. I also think that when Eric watches this season again in a few years he will regret not giving his vote to Russell. Erik is the kind of guy who I thought would respect a player like Russell. I think Eric was still smarting from the whole Galu disaster. I do not believe the jury voted for Natalie, I believe the jury voted against Russell. Russell was clearly upset last night and I think a lot of people understand why that would be. He played a very risky and creative game and he wanted to be acknowledged. As for the audience, they spoke quite loudly when they awarded him the $100,000 from Sprint by an overwhelming 46% Russell to 10% Shambo… and 7% Natalie. Not even close. I put myself in that same group. Again, I'm speaking as a fan, not as a host or a producer. But hey this is how it goes, it's why Survivor is so fun to watch, you can never predict the outcome. So… A FEW QUESTIONS… Q. Can you be considered the greatest player ever if you don't win? Hmmm. It's a tough question for me. On one hand, it's a no-brainer, absolutely not. Survivor is a social game and to win you have to vote people out in a way that compels them to return and vote for you to win the game. It's extremely complicated and Russell did not achieve it, therefore he cannot be considered the greatest player to ever play. On the other hand, I can't think of anybody who has ever played a game like Russell played. It was so dominating that I am still shaking my head that he didn't win. The only guy I could even see having the talent and guts to do something equally dominating would be Boston Rob. So I am on the fence on this one. But this much I am certain of - Russell is without any question ONE of the greats. No doubt about it. Q. Did Natalie play a better game than Russell? For me, that's a bit easier to answer. I do not think that Natalie played a better game, but rather was the right person in the right position who made one very good strategic move and that was to stay out of Russell's way, and as a result she ended up with the money. But to be fair - a very good counter argument is that Natalie used her strengths, avoided her weaknesses and by taking this active approach to the game, she put herself in position to win the money and it paid off. It's a counter argument, but not one that I'm that fond of supporting. Q. Was this a great season or a lame season? For me, this is another easy question. Survivor: Samoa will rank as one of my favorite seasons and for one reason: Russell Hantz. He single handedly kept this show interesting week after week after week. But I know some will argue that because it was "The Russell Season" it lacked having more big characters and therefore does not rank as high. This is one that will be debated by Survivor fans for years to come. LIFE GOES ON AND SO DOES SURVIVOR I hope you're all jazzed about Survivor: Heroes Vs. Villains. I think you are going to really enjoy it! We have an all-star cast returning. A lot of people you will expect and want to see and a couple of surprise choices that may leave you scratching your head, which we love, by the way. LIVE FOR THE MOMENT One last reminder - if you are looking for a show that offers adventure as well as a positive message about how to live your life to the fullest. Check out Live for the Moment Thursday, Jan. 28 at 8pm on CBS. Happy Holidays Survivor fans - and Happy New Year. Too lazy to edit this |
||
JaimeCat22 |
|||
|
So I guess that All-Star invite for Natalie won't be coming anytime soon. lol |
|||
PrettyGoodYear1988 |
|||
But to be fair - a very good counter argument is that Natalie used her strengths, avoided her weaknesses and by taking this active approach to the game, she put herself in position to win the money and it paid off. It's a counter argument, but not one that I'm that fond of supporting. After 19 seasons how is Probst still so clueless about the best way to win this game? Every winner uses their strengths and avoids their weaknesses. |
|||
AmightyRo |
|||
JaimeCat22 wrote:Perhaps she was asked, and declined? |
|||
speedyforme |
|||
|
Posts: 8264 (12/21/09 09:44 PM) Registered user |
Jeff sucks at his assessment. Seriously. Samoa is one of the best, WRONG. The audience spoke, WRONG, the audience does not have to live out there for 39
days, and deal w/ Russell, Nat etc. And was it really between Shambo, Nat and Russell for the $100k or was it Brett????
Anyway, his blog sucked this season. |
||
seltzer3 |
|||
|
lol, if the audience's vote was supposed to be credible, than that means Shambo is supposedly the 2nd best person to play the
game.
|
|||
cindidindi76 |
|||
|
What a shock, the two people who got the majority of the airtime this season were the top vote getters!! I never would have guessed!!!!!!!! Rupert must be an AMAZING player! |
|||
WildCard88 |
|||
|
You know, I think if Jeff Probst had his way, the only time a female would win this game would be if they faced off against another female. In fact, since
All-Stars, that has been the case until last night. Eleven seasons since All-Stars and only three wins by females with two of them coming in a female vs.
female situation. Maybe Jeff should listen to what he actually says at the final tribal council. He never says anything about their vote going to the
"best player". He always blabbers on about the jury voting on who they think is "most deserving". That leaves a lot of room for
interpretation by the jury. Now he's trying to imprint his idea of what deserving is on to their final piece of power in the game. So what if they are
bitter? I mean, even he brings it up from time to time about balancing putting people on the jury and getting them to vote for you at the end. Ironically
enough, a statement I think he intended to help Russell actually may have cost him a bit by stating that each of the final three voted for everyone on the
jury.
|
|||
seltzer3 |
|||
|
Actually there was an interview with Jeff. Someone asked him a question, which winners he preferred should not have won.
Pretty much he didn't think any of the female winners other than Danni should have won. He also didn't think Brian and Earl should have won which was stupid as well. |
|||
Oowatanite |
|||
|
Probst is an asshole. He wets his panties over JT's win with a good "social game" and then can't believe that the asshole troll he pimped
the whole year choked miserably in that same "social game".
I just wish that someday that infamous CBS "contract for life" gets successfully challenged by an former player and then the floodgates open and a whole bunch of ex-players come out and give us the real shit on Probst and Survivor and what really happens out there. |
|||