Jedijake wrote:Okay, but edgically, Mick didn't have the numbers.
the reason I'd go Natalie over Mick was simply, storyline.But that's never been what Edgic is all about. Edgic has sadly been only about numbers and most times someone actually does bring up storylines, people often remind that person that this is Edgic and not stories.
But also sadly, too much time in Edgic is spent discussing people who have already been voted off. From Monday until Wednesday in most seasons, the thread does little in looking at possible winners and simply tries to solidify numbers and ratings for people who were voted off or eliminated.
I think that if anything is shown, this season proves that more attention DOES need to be given to stories and that more discussion needs to tie into that more wholistic approach rather than charts, graphs, and logarithms.
He had them pre-merge, not post-merge. Things Mick didn't have going for him, aside from storyline:
1. No tone.
2. Bad merge episode.
3. Three UTR's post-merge.
4. Edit faltering post merge, which is unconventional for a winner.
5. Long streak of MOR.
6. Ignored in long stretches.
7. Low visibility for a male winner.
There are probably more I'm missing, but these are a lot of "exceptions" which means he wasn't edgically viable. If Sierra was dropped, Mick should have as well. Natalie was edgically unviable by traditional edgic, yes. But so was Mick. That is my point. I hated when people preached how Mick was the only edgically viable candidate left and it made no sense at all to me. I'm not hating people for sticking to their guns, and I often felt like people made great arguments ... I mean, gf is always convincing. But to look down upon Nat supporters (who ended up being right) when Mick didn't have very much going for him didn't make sense to me.












