Um no. Worst winner ever. in Survivor Sucks Forum

0 Points

Um no. Worst winner ever.

Started By	Comment
shollia		#121	[-]
Posts: 67 (12/20/09 11:35 PM) Reply Quote More Recent Posts	Do you believe in love at first sight or should I walk by again ? Remove this ad LOLABINGO wrote: It could have been worse. Jaison could have won. Or Mick. So true... so true... I think Jaison would've been worse than Mick.
cg41386		#122	[-]
Posts: 14930 (12/20/09 11:39 PM) Registered user Reply Quote More Recent Posts	novaya wrote: Eliza is so much fail. GO DONATE $2,300 TO THAT AWARD-WINNING MORAL MAN KNOWN AS JOHN EDWARDS AGAIN! <3 Eliza hates Laura because she's a Republican, and hates Natalie because she's a prayer warrior. SHOCKER. SUCH TRANSPARENCY! Oh, and Eliza? Merry Christmas! ^_^ I dont agree with Eliza about Russell, but seriously? Go fuck yourself
bensylarlocke		#123	[-]
Posts: 127 (12/20/09 11:39 PM) Reply Quote More Recent Posts	Kenscookie wrote: Oh come on, peeps. Brian Heidik won because no matter how pissed off the jury was, they were smart enough to take their hats off and say, you know what? I may not like you and you may be a total douchebag, but you absolutely played us all and controlled this game. For that, you win, motherfucker. This jury? Dumbasses, most of them. The reason Brian won is he brought a bigger goat to the end something Russell did not do. He needed to convince Jaison to keep Shambo because all the Galu hate her and they can battle it out in the final 3. That was Russell's game changing decision that cost him the million dollars.
WillyEx		#124	[-]
Posts: 140 (12/20/09 11:45 PM) Reply Quote More Recent Posts	This is like when Danielle from Big Brother got robbed against Lisa!!
novaya		#125	[-]
Posts: 1323 (12/20/09 11:49 PM) Reply Quote More Recent Posts	cg41386 wrote: I dont agree with Eliza about Russell, but seriously? Go fuck yourself No thanks; I'm not attracted to blond men. <3 Eliza is a freaking hypocritical political whorebag and it has EMERGED in full force during Samoa. I may have loved her journey in Micro (Vanuatu is meh) but she needs to grow the fuck up and deal that yes, people exist in this world that enjoy Jesus, hate Shambo, and enjoy being compared to Sarah Palin (Laura). Her comments on people like Laura, JOHN (LOL!), and Natalie just re-enforce her complete lack of objectivity and instead highlight the pathetic and flagrant socio-identity politics that define her life.
Kenscookie		#126	[-]
Posts: 5785 (12/20/09 11:50 PM) Registered user Reply Quote More Recent Posts	bensylarlocke wrote: Kenscookie wrote: Oh come on, peeps. Brian Heidik won because no matter how pissed off the jury was, they were smart enough to take their hats off and say, you know what? I may not like you and you may be a total douchebag, but you absolutely played us all and controlled this game. For that, you win, motherfucker. This jury? Dumbasses, most of them. The reason Brian won is he brought a bigger goat to the end something Russell did not do. He needed to convince Jaison to keep Shambo because all the Galu hate her and they can battle it out in the final 3. That was Russell's game changing decision that cost him the million dollars. Russell didn't really have a "Clay" to bring. Even Shambo was no Clay. I think he was smart for not pushing it when people didn't want to vote his way. The one decision I think he will always regret is not keeping his word to Brett and forcing a tie between Brett and Mick. I know he feared that Brett would win and would go to the F3 as a jury favorite, but it was a 50/50. If Brett had lost the tie breaker, he would probably vote for Russell to win and convince other jurors to vote with him. It was a longshot, and I don't blame Russell for doing what he did, but now in retrospect, it might have worked out better for him. We'll never know.
CAPSattack		#127	[-]
Posts: 7299 (12/20/09 11:51 PM) Reply Quote More Recent Posts	khnum wrote: lol ownt bitches
Phukdis		#128	[-]
Posts: 556 (12/20/09 11:52 PM) Registered User Reply Quote More Recent Posts	I can understand the Natalie win, UTR is always a good candidate for a win, but-what in the fuck are you people talking about Natalie being somehow in charge of the Eric boot? She basically told the Galunatics she didn't trust him-but that vote is still all on the Galunatics. It had very little to do with Natalie, and a whole lot more to do with the stupidity of the Galu group. Natalie and her Foa Foas were only 4 votes, so the idea of NATALIE being somehow responsible for the Eric boot is ridiculous.
JaimeCat22		#129	[-]
Posts: 444 (12/20/09 11:52 PM) Reply Quote More Recent Posts	"Worst winner ever" thread being more than twice as big as "best winner ever" thread seething <3.
seltzer3		#130	[-]
Posts: 1576 (12/20/09 11:53 PM) Registered User Reply Quote More Recent Posts	Do you believe in love at first sight or should I walk by again ? Remove this ad Also the whole "Natalie won, because the jury was bitter towards Russell" doesn't really work. If that was the only case, than you would definitely have some votes being thrown at Mick (I would argue more votes for Mick than Natalie, based on UTR males generally get more credit than UTR females). You wouldn't have all the votes go to Natalie.
Die Apokalyptischen Reiter		#131	[-]
Posts: 1755 (12/21/09 12:05 AM) Reply Quote More Recent Posts	EOrlins wrote: I think John was the 2nd one. Obviously Shambo was the first. John was the 2nd because he's rational and logical and not bitter and jealous and emotional. You're probably right it was John.
Wc3Fanatic		#132	[-]
Posts: 1893 (12/21/09 12:09 AM) Registered user Reply Quote More Recent Posts	Dude, Eliza, big fan of being rational but John was not rational. If he had been able to flip Shambo back against FF after his laura fiasco, then his claims would have had credence, but he had no such abilities and thus sealed Galu's fate in the game.
Flav4		#133	[-]
Posts: 179 (12/21/09 12:12 AM) Reply Quote More Recent Posts	I don't care what anyone says, Ratalie sucked. Russell, by far, played the better game. All this social skills crap is irrelevant cause Ratalie rode coattails.
PJMichaelangelo		#134	[-]
Posts: 158 (12/21/09 12:16 AM) Registered user Reply Quote More Recent Posts	ThrowMeGabon wrote: Amber was totally aware of what she was doing too. Just because you're aware you're doing nothing doesn't mean you're doing something. XXX
WylDawg		#135	[-]
Posts: 21475 (12/21/09 12:20 AM) Registered user Reply Quote More Recent Posts	seltzer3 wrote: Also the whole "Natalie won, because the jury was bitter towards Russell" doesn't really work. If that was the only case, than you would definitely have some votes being thrown at Mick (I would argue more votes for Mick than Natalie, based on UTR males generally get more credit than UTR females). You wouldn't have all the votes go to Natalie. Exactly. Mick being thrown in the mix shows that Natalie's win wasn't a fluke because the jury had a third option. And Amber was NOT the same thing as Natalie. Albeit very similar, but the difference is that Amber found herself a shield, and thought "Whatever, I can just just lie down now and not have to move or talk to people...." Natalie went out of her way to bond with people and cash in jury votes while Russell was thinking up of ways to become the ultimate mastermind. Amber simply banked on being less hated than Rob and she narrowly won because of it.
LOLABINGO		#136	[-]
Posts: 8094 (12/21/09 12:23 AM) Reply Quote More Recent Posts	I think they wanted a block vote and since the women (and Brett) intended on voting for Natalie, they didn't want to risk someone flipping, and the Mick/Nat vote splitting and Russ accidentally winning.
Mateui		#137	[-]
Posts: 2764 (12/21/09 12:26 AM) Registered user Reply Quote More Recent Posts	What makes Natalie's win dissatisfying to me is that it didn't appear that she was even playing to win the game at all. Her motivation was just to get as far as possible, and she would be grateful for whatever placing she managed to get. I'd be impressed if she was actually concientiously using Russell as a shield and planning to win that way, but she never made any mention of that in confessionals - but she did state on numerous occasions that she'd do whatever Russell would tell her to do, like some mindless drone. I'd like to be able to congratulate her, but she really didn't show much drive to win - it just kind of happened.
seltzer3		#138	[-]
Posts: 1580 (12/21/09 12:26 AM) Registered User Reply Quote More Recent Posts	I think they wanted a block vote and since the women (and Brett) intended on voting for Natalie, they didn't want to risk someone flipping, and the Mick/Nat vote splitting and Russ accidentally winning. That would be against the rules. The jury members are not allowed to discuss with each other who they are voting for each other.
Flav4		#139	[-]
Posts: 190 (12/21/09 12:27 AM) Reply Quote More Recent Posts	Russell made the right choice in not taking Brett. He would have been trampled by votes in a clean sweep. Still, RATalie prevails over Russ. EPIC FAIL!!
WylDawg		#140	[-]
Posts: 21477 (12/21/09 12:29 AM) Registered user Reply Quote More Recent Posts	Do you believe in love at first sight or should I walk by again ? Remove this ad I'd be impressed if she was actually concientiously using Russell as a shield and planning to win that way, but she never made any mention of that in confessionals. Actually she did. On ep 3 or 4 she said she'd be forming bonds with people while Russell only focuses on getting to the end. I'll admit her jury performance was underwhelming and she sounded a bit clueless, but she knew what she was doing.

<< Previous Topic Next Topic >>

Yuku free message boards

Um no. Worst winner ever.