New Poll
| Started By | Comment | ||
|---|---|---|---|
 CrystalOwnage |
|||
|
Posts: 5649 (12/22/09 02:10 PM) |
JaimeCat22 wrote:This. The winner is never TRULY invisible, though. I doubt they will give her a Natalie-type edit. |
||
 Dr Will Hatch two point oh |
|||
|
Posts: 10079 (12/22/09 04:54 PM) Registered user |
GrenadeJumper85 wrote: Crap. We have another bitter ASS jury. |
||
|
speedyforme |
|||
|
Posts: 8267 (12/22/09 05:05 PM) Registered user |
Maximus20 wrote:I wish it were true but you know the stupid American audience, once a villian always a villian. She can save kittens and the whales and still get boo'd. |
||
|
speedyforme |
|||
|
Posts: 8268 (12/22/09 05:06 PM) Registered user |
GrenadeJumper85 wrote:If Parv can't even get the white-supremacists' vote then I find it hard for her to win. |
||
|
JaimeCat22 |
|||
|
Posts: 538 (12/22/09 05:07 PM) |
Dr Will Hatch two point oh wrote: Certainly seems that way. On the bright side, at least the beneficiary this time will be someone with an entertaining personality. |
||
|
craig |
|||
|
Posts: 16761 (12/22/09 05:09 PM) Registered User |
Even if Candice feels betrayed going into final TC, I think she's enough of a rational player to vote on game (like Eliza). With Jerri, on the other hand,
you can predict 100% that if Parv wins the last IC and targets her, she'll vote Sandra.
|
||
|
JaimeCat22 |
|||
|
Posts: 539 (12/22/09 05:10 PM) |
Jerri's jury speech should be epic. I can almost feel the venom oozing out of her in her Twitter posts.
|
||
|
LKMOSCAR |
|||
|
Posts: 8204 (12/22/09 05:12 PM) Registered user |
Boy oh boy! You all are going to be very surprised.
|
||
|
JaimeCat22 |
|||
|
Posts: 540 (12/22/09 05:13 PM) |
In a good way or a bad way?
|
||
|
about that |
|||
|
Posts: 3248 (12/22/09 05:24 PM) Registered User |
Sandra and Jerri's FB/Twitter comments are hilarious, but I do not put much stock in them. We do not really know much about whether they got along with
Russell in S20 or not. To me, their comments sound more like they are upset about CBS' over-hyping Russell's supposed strategic prowess and crazy
antics, specially since there is a double standard when female contestants play a similar game.
Also, Russell probably doesn't need to play very hard until mid-game since the Villains tribe doesn't go to TC as much as Foa Foa did in S19, and he knows he's playing with a some people who know what they're doing, so I think he must have adjusted his "in your face" strategy. Otherwise, he would have been voted off before the merge. |
||
|
tomash |
|||
|
Posts: 2172 (12/22/09 05:29 PM) |
Alol @ people talking about 'bitter juries' already and the wrong person winning already.
We don't even know how the season plays out yet, for all we know Sandra (who we don't have confirmed as a winner btw) could be the strategic mastermind of s20. |
||
|
dissimilis |
|||
|
Posts: 7500 (12/22/09 05:35 PM) Registered User |
If Sandra didnt get the editing shaft with Rupert, Fairplay and the whole outcasts thing in PI, I cant see her getting the editing shaft this time around. She
is way too big of a personality to not feature heavily.
|
||
|
MMan9000 |
|||
|
Posts: 167 (12/22/09 05:51 PM) |
I'd say we're going to be surprised in a good way. LKMOSCAR has said that Sandra will make a better winner than Parvati would've, and he's also
said that Sandra will not be UTR/ignored, so I'd say we're going to be in for a good surprise.
|
||
|
JaimeCat22 |
|||
|
Posts: 543 (12/22/09 05:52 PM) |
That's good to hear. I'll take the Sandra avatar as a positive sign.
|
||
|
Maximus20 |
|||
|
Posts: 431 (12/22/09 06:08 PM) |
tomash wrote: Maybe thats the surprise.... It sure would Surprise me....I mean shes entertaining...but I think most people are assuming she ISNT the one in charge...... |
||
|
AmightyRo |
|||
|
Posts: 1423 (12/22/09 06:20 PM) |
Wasn't the general concenus of speculation that Sandra won? So wouldn't a surprise be that she didn't win?
Maybe Russell wins???? :-o Nah. |
||
|
AlsoKnownAsJer2002 |
|||
|
Posts: 539 (12/22/09 06:40 PM) Registered User |
I hope Parvati wins. Only cause everyone assumes Sandra did. Makes for a great board implosion
|
||
|
Dr Will Hatch two point oh |
|||
|
Posts: 10080 (12/22/09 06:41 PM) Registered user |
tomash wrote: I don't believe I've ever in my life said that a Survivor winner undeserving. I just can't stand Sandra's childish temper tantrums whenever she doesn't get her way. |
||
|
Oowatanite |
|||
|
Posts: 9879 (12/22/09 07:06 PM) Registered User |
tomash wrote: 
Sandra may end up winning but it WILL NOT be because she's a strategic mastermind. She'll be a default winner as the lesser of three evils. And that's it.
|
||
|
Jedijake |
|||
|
Posts: 6086 (12/22/09 07:17 PM) MESS member |
She may emerge as one though. I'm getting used to the fact that she may win. I liked her a lot in S7, would rather a non-winner win (but not Russell), but
would accept Sandra happily in the current state of things.
I don't think that Russell will be able to claim that he was a puppetmaster in S20. I think that others will seek him out and give him no choice in the matter. People like Sandra and even Parvati are not going to sit by and give the impression they did nothing when the jury speaks. Russell will probably be more upset but will have less of a fight. But he may be humbled by being around people who have played 3 times and didn't make the finals or win. All in all, if he comes in third, it will not only be to two females but to two females who have already won. Ouch! And Amanda can tell him to stop bitching and moaning for making the finals twice without winning. |
||
Message board courtesy of Survivor Sucks member support.
Benevolent dictatorship courtesy of Survivor Sucks Admin Idoits.
