| Started By | Comment | ||
|---|---|---|---|
 Peteybird |
|||
|
Posts: 206 (12/21/09 11:02 AM) Registered user |
I keep seeing these retarded posts.
WHAT DID NATALIE EVEN DO? Seriously... CBS knew Natalie was going to win before the show went live, you can bet they gave her the best edit possible. And still, nothing... |
||
|
meathead |
|||
|
Posts: 146 (12/21/09 11:02 AM) Registered User |
Who's Natalie?
|
||
|
garblue |
|||
|
Posts: 3027 (12/21/09 11:15 AM) Registered User |
Miss Alki versus poindexter Dalton
Ross
And somehow, despite the fact that the rest of his alliance correctly understood the social dynamics and Russell massively misread them, there are cries that this is -- wait, what was it Dalton Ross said at Entertainment Weekly? -- yes, there it is. A travesty. You may have been rooting for Natalie because you liked her better (And that's fine. I get that.) but if you are voting, and you take that job seriously, you have to put that aside and vote for the best player. Any way you slice it, Natalie was not the best player. First of all, if you are voting and you take that job seriously, you have lost your grip on reality, because voting on Survivor is not a "job" to "take seriously." Second of all, there is no such thing as a "best player" other than the player who gets people to vote for him or her. |
||
|
Surfing Hippo in Trouble |
|||
|
Posts: 1969 (12/21/09 11:16 AM) |
WTF is with all these random noob Natalie haters.
Natalie <333333333333333333 |
||
|
smellofawoman |
|||
|
Posts: 604 (12/21/09 11:17 AM) |
Per that article:
Third of all: If you're a juror, you don't have to put aside anything! You have the ultimate power of your own reckless, irrational whimsy! That is the absolute essence of the game. The essence of being a juror on Survivor is that you can do whatever you want. The fact that some jurors vote out of a twisted sense of "respect," some vote out of resentment, some vote out of loyalty, and some vote because they think one person needs the money more? That's the game. Those are the rules, and everybody knows them, and everybody has the same opportunity to take them into account and play accordingly. The problem with Miss Alki is that she's not objective. I agree with everything she said, but during the All-Stars finale? It was all what a bunch of sore losers Big Tom, Twatwaffle and Outclassicia were. If that were the standard for every season, I would agree. |
||
|
Stranded |
|||
|
Posts: 2696 (12/21/09 11:21 AM) Registered User |
Second of all, there is no such thing as a "best player" other than the player who gets people to vote for him or her. THIS. A
MILLION TIMES THIS.
Last Edited By: Stranded
12/21/09 11:27 AM.
Edited 1 times.
|
||
|
garblue |
|||
|
Posts: 3028 (12/21/09 11:26 AM) Registered User |
I agree with her article, but I would like to point out that she continues to be wrong about Marissa. Marissa was nobody's idea of a weak link, and only
pig Russell and bigot Ben thought she was annoying.
|
||
|
Gregoire |
|||
|
Posts: 34846 (12/21/09 11:26 AM) Registered user |
smellofawoman wrote: Um, what did Natalie do? Nothing, same as Mick. She was literally selected by a spiteful jury. In essence, her only strategy was not being Mick. |
||
|
SurvivorNinja |
|||
|
Posts: 3201 (12/21/09 11:38 AM) Registered user |
Natalie >>>>> Russell H
|
||
|
IluvGoddessCirie |
|||
|
Posts: 581 (12/21/09 11:46 AM) |
SGD wrote: For fucks sake. Russel did not boot 14 or 15 people single handedly. I agree he deserved to win, but he gets WAY too much credit for things he did not do. Ben and Shambo I would give credit to Jaison for. Erik I would give Natalie the credit. Kelly and Dave were Shambo's choices. Getting Betsy and Ashley booted? What epic strategic moves! No one would have thought of getting rid of the older woman or the weakest tribe mate would they? I give credit to Russel for the moves that were his (Laura, John, Jaison, Marissa) and his hand in the other boots. But he was not single handedly responsible for everyone's ouster despite the editing, his own protestations or Probst's multiple orgasms. |
||
|
pinkbug8u |
|||
|
Posts: 160 (12/21/09 11:46 AM) Registered User |
Gregoire do you watch the show at all or do you just see what you want to see?
|
||
|
Dizzie Lizzie57 |
|||
|
Posts: 282 (12/21/09 11:54 AM) |
Now this was a shit shocker Natalie winning! I hate Russell, but after awhile, I thought he is right, most of these ppl are a bunch of idiots!!
That was his BIG mistake thinking they THINK logically when it came to voting! Even his answers to the jurors questions and his final speech, may have been true, but came off as way to cocky for 5 of the scorn jurors, they couldn't see beyond their nose and just remembered how Russell screwed them over so they wiped that smirk right off his face! I watched the Early Show, Russell was still complaining about not winning! The man who was interviewing them, he even got off on Russell bitching, and said something like, let us rub salt in the wound more and show Russel the real check for Natalie LOL! Russell will be remember as the BIGGEST SORE LOSER! Don't you think he should be thanking America for selecting him as their FAVORITE at least act HAPPY about this honor, instead of dissing Natalie? I think we'll being seeing him on "The Soup" Happy Holidays to everyone! |
||
|
Stranded |
|||
|
Posts: 2697 (12/21/09 11:55 AM) Registered User |
pinkbug8u wrote: Agreed. |
||
|
GGG |
|||
|
Posts: 4 (12/21/09 11:57 AM) |
snake oil wrote:Natalie is a great winner because she is actually likeable and isn't a horrible person. JT and Stephen were both boring and did nothing but sit there and watch Timbira crumble. |
||
|
Huntorr |
|||
|
Posts: 116 (12/21/09 11:58 AM) |
They both deserved to win. Natalie played a great game, Russell fans need to deal with it. |
||
|
Understandermant |
|||
|
Posts: 479 (12/21/09 12:07 PM) |
Umm....a woman won. That should be enough.
Russell losing to a girl <3 |
||
|
ThrowMeGabon |
|||
|
Posts: 1268 (12/21/09 12:10 PM) |
He played a fantastic strategic game and a bad social game, she played a mediocre strategic game and a mediocre social game. I don't hate Natalie: against
Mick and Jaison, she would've deserved to win. Against Russell, she didn't. Over time we'll realize what a shitty winner she was...I think people
are just happy a female finally won again.
|
||
|
Stranded |
|||
|
Posts: 2698 (12/21/09 12:15 PM) Registered User |
ThrowMeGabon wrote: I think you're just in shock at how Russell sucked at the game. Honestly? You think he really owned this season? She made every decision with him AND he never would have moved that far in the game without her crumbling Galu in the merge episode. End. Of. Story. |
||
|
bryanpasa |
|||
|
Posts: 2965 (12/21/09 12:17 PM) |
Natalie deserves it....LOL @ all Natalie hate.
|
||
|
Heliox |
|||
|
Posts: 3686 (12/21/09 12:19 PM) |
Natalie, Jordan and Kris Allen. A banner year for idiots winning reality tv shows.
|
||
Message board courtesy of Survivor Sucks member support.
Benevolent dictatorship courtesy of Survivor Sucks Admin Idoits.
