hi i have spoilers too!!! in Survivor Spoilers Forum

0 Points

hi i have spoilers too!!!

Started By	Comment
SurferZ		#1961	[-]
Posts: 25 (12/22/09 07:23 PM) More Recent Posts	Ads - The reason I wake up every morning. Remove this ad If you guys did not see the Dalton Ross interview with Russell he gives a little reference to S20. After Russell goes on this rant about Jaison being weak and needing help, he says something along the lines of how he should help these people, like this guy Coach, they need help.
Maximus20		#1962	[-]
Posts: 432 (12/22/09 07:32 PM) More Recent Posts	^haha yeah I noticed that too No epic Coach/Russel alliance I guess
indiekid26		#1963	[-]
Posts: 6028 (12/22/09 08:07 PM) More Recent Posts	Oowatanite wrote: tomash wrote: We don't even know how the season plays out yet, for all we know Sandra could be the strategic mastermind of s20. Sandra may end up winning but it WILL NOT be because she's a strategic mastermind. She'll be a default winner as the lesser of three evils. And that's it. Oo, let's take a look at the track record of people you've supported and championed as deserving winners (who never end up winning) over the last several seasons...shall we?
round peg		#1964	[-]
Posts: 453 (12/22/09 08:34 PM) More Recent Posts	EXACTLY! indiekid26 the fucker Oo-wank-inite is always made a fool, half the time by his damn self, like this season for example. He was so certain that Mick was gonna take it! acting like a condescending jerk off, only for that boring piece of shit mick to get 0 votes!
LKMOSCAR		#1965	[-]
Posts: 8205 (12/22/09 08:37 PM) Registered user More Recent Posts	By the way, Russell does not lose because of a bitter jury. In S20, he makes at least TWO ginormous mistakes. In an interview he gave the other night, it's in one of the Sucks threads, a lady asks him if he'd change anything about his game this season (Samoa). He responds with something like, "Well, in THIS season I wouldn't have changed anything." Knowing what he does in S20, he knows that he made errors. I don't think he'll be playing the "I should have won card" in May.
JaimeCat22		#1966	[-]
Posts: 545 (12/22/09 08:40 PM) More Recent Posts	Does Parvati lose because of a bitter jury?
Heliox		#1967	[-]
Posts: 3693 (12/22/09 09:17 PM) More Recent Posts	Jeff in an interview about S20 I hope you're all jazzed about Survivor: Heroes Vs. Villains. I think you are going to really enjoy it! We have an all-star cast returning. A lot of people you will expect and want to see and a couple of surprise choices that may leave you scratching your head, which we love, by the way. A couple of surprise choices, that they love to leave us scratching our head? That is probably code for Spillbitch over ruled my ass and we have some idiots who don't deserve to be on the show but are returning anyway. ie-Danielle and Candice
Maximus20		#1968	[-]
Posts: 433 (12/22/09 09:36 PM) More Recent Posts	LKMOSCAR wrote: By the way, Russell does not lose because of a bitter jury. In S20, he makes at least TWO ginormous mistakes. In an interview he gave the other night, it's in one of the Sucks threads, a lady asks him if he'd change anything about his game this season (Samoa). He responds with something like, "Well, in THIS season I wouldn't have changed anything." Knowing what he does in S20, he knows that he made errors. I don't think he'll be playing the "I should have won card" in May. Wow they must have been pretty large errors if RUSSEL sees them as mistakes. (Which I assume is what your saying, even Russel realizes he screwed up??) because frankly I think he made some big errors in Samoa too lmao. Can't wait to see!
speedyforme		#1969	[-]
Posts: 8269 (12/22/09 09:37 PM) Registered user More Recent Posts	LKMOSCAR wrote: By the way, Russell does not lose because of a bitter jury. In S20, he makes at least TWO ginormous mistakes. In an interview he gave the other night, it's in one of the Sucks threads, a lady asks him if he'd change anything about his game this season (Samoa). He responds with something like, "Well, in THIS season I wouldn't have changed anything." Knowing what he does in S20, he knows that he made errors. I don't think he'll be playing the "I should have won card" in May. Yeah probably going to the end with Parvati and Sandra. LOL. 1 & 2.
roxbury123		#1970	[-]
Posts: 686 (12/22/09 09:38 PM) More Recent Posts	Ads - The reason I wake up every morning. Remove this ad Heliox wrote: Jeff in an interview about S20 I hope you're all jazzed about Survivor: Heroes Vs. Villains. I think you are going to really enjoy it! We have an all-star cast returning. A lot of people you will expect and want to see and a couple of surprise choices that may leave you scratching your head, which we love, by the way. A couple of surprise choices, that they love to leave us scratching our head? That is probably code for Spillbitch over ruled my ass and we have some idiots who don't deserve to be on the show but are returning anyway. ie-Danielle and Candice dont forget Erika Lynn Shay who only casts her friends.
indiekid26		#1971	[-]
Posts: 6030 (12/22/09 09:57 PM) More Recent Posts	LKMOSCAR - you have tips for this season?
MMan9000		#1972	[-]
Posts: 168 (12/22/09 10:13 PM) More Recent Posts	Does one of Russell's big mistakes involve taking a certain kick-ass latina that can get loud to the end?
Oowatanite		#1973	[-]
Posts: 9888 (12/22/09 10:29 PM) Registered User More Recent Posts	indiekid26 wrote: Oowatanite wrote: tomash wrote: We don't even know how the season plays out yet, for all we know Sandra could be the strategic mastermind of s20. Sandra may end up winning but it WILL NOT be because she's a strategic mastermind. She'll be a default winner as the lesser of three evils. And that's it. Oo, let's take a look at the track record of people you've supported and championed as deserving winners (who never end up winning) over the last several seasons...shall we? What the hell does that hafta do with Sandra ? Sandra was a default winner in S7 and she probably will be a default winner in S20. Good for her but she's no "strategic mastermind".
7neves7		#1974	[-]
Posts: 2868 (12/22/09 10:42 PM) Registered User More Recent Posts	Honestly, I really don't give a shit.. I like Sandra because she is a great character and she isn't afraid to tell it like it is. It makes it even greater that she gets far and (hopefully) wins. She may not be a strategic mastermind, but she is doing something right for getting to the end both times. The great thing about Sandra is that she doesn't just sit back and let people do things. She will actually take control and make moves, instead of sitting back and trying to fly under the radar. While being UTR is a legit strategy, its boring to watch on the tube..
Kirblar		#1975	[-]
Posts: 8629 (12/22/09 10:54 PM) Registered user More Recent Posts	Someone mentioned in one of these threads they heard Russ regretted not taking Amanda to the end.
xena321		#1976	[-]
Posts: 83 (12/22/09 11:04 PM) Registered User More Recent Posts	Kirblar wrote: Someone mentioned in one of these threads they heard Russ regretted not taking Amanda to the end. Probaly he feels like her since he failed twice in back-to-back seasons.
ElisabethNelehHeidiRok		#1977	[-]
Posts: 1772 (12/23/09 12:07 AM) Registered User More Recent Posts	I think that was at Vevmo, which I dont think that person knew what they were talking about because I thought Russell got along well with Candice.
survivorready		#1978	[-]
Posts: 525 (12/23/09 01:21 AM) More Recent Posts	I just hope they won't give Russell the same edit they gave him this time: he deserved it but went up to a bitter jury!! Russell's argument that the proof that he played a good strategic game is the fact that he controlled everybody is just BOGUS! Controlling people doesn't necessarily mean that he played a social game at all. Social game is getting people to like you no matter how many moves you make against them. For example, Parvati did turn her back on Natalie and Alexis, but they still liked her and understood why she had to do certain things. The same thing goes for Cirie! The difference between people like Russell and Parvati/Cirie is that he makes it much more personal! When Parv/Cirie voted out Ozzy they said it was because he was a threat, Russell would say b/c that "dumb bitch came after me"! In the end Rusell just played a horrible SOCIAL GAME! Isn't it funny that if Russell loses next season, Amanda and him will be two people who lost 2 seasons back-to-back because of doing the same thing in their respective seasons? Amanda- Horrible final tribal perfomances! Russell- bringing the wrong people to the finals!
Lexxan		#1979	[-]
Posts: 939 (12/23/09 02:19 AM) More Recent Posts	Kirblar wrote: Someone mentioned in one of these threads they heard Russ regretted not taking Amanda to the end. I can imagine him saying to Amanda during his Jury speech "Well, I should have taken you, since you suck at giving speeches" Way to work the Jury, Russ
val.kellyclarksonex...		#1980	[-]
Posts: 257 (12/23/09 06:54 AM) More Recent Posts	Ads - The reason I wake up every morning. Remove this ad survivorready wrote: I just hope they won't give Russell the same edit they gave him this time: he deserved it but went up to a bitter jury!! Russell's argument that the proof that he played a good strategic game is the fact that he controlled everybody is just BOGUS! Controlling people doesn't necessarily mean that he played a social game at all. Social game is getting people to like you no matter how many moves you make against them. For example, Parvati did turn her back on Natalie and Alexis, but they still liked her and understood why she had to do certain things. The same thing goes for Cirie! The difference between people like Russell and Parvati/Cirie is that he makes it much more personal! When Parv/Cirie voted out Ozzy they said it was because he was a threat, Russell would say b/c that "dumb bitch came after me"! In the end Rusell just played a horrible SOCIAL GAME! Isn't it funny that if Russell loses next season, Amanda and him will be two people who lost 2 seasons back-to-back because of doing the same thing in their respective seasons? Amanda- Horrible final tribal perfomances! Russell- bringing the wrong people to the finals! I couldn't agree more. And I hate tha fact that he THINKS he totally deserves the money just for playing a good strategic game. Someone tell him that it was good but not flawless. The social game is a key factor at the end, but probably he knows it by now lol

<< Previous Topic Next Topic >>

Yuku free message boards

hi i have spoilers too!!!