
| Started By | Comment | ||
|---|---|---|---|
TRAINROBBER |
|||
|
for anyone to say Natalie played an amazing game is laughable and ignorant...I'm no fan of the way Russell played the game but Natalie only made it as far
as she did because of Russell...the Jury vote was against Russell to win more than a vote for Natalie...history will prove it...
|
|||
IluvGoddessCirie |
|||
Ichiro20 wrote: In comparison to Eliza she certainly did play an amazing social game. But then again so did a lot of Survivors...... |
|||
OrsNaz |
|||
Quiddity wrote: Not at all. I can name a ton of small framed female contestants who performed better than males much larger than Russell and I know you can too. Like I said over and over, it wasn't the greatest example to prove my point but it is still valid. Darrah competed against Burton and won several times. Burton is a much larger physical threat than Russell could ever be. There are several instances like this, including Laura of this season. You are letting your bias cloud your judgment and you know I am right. Natalie couldn't win bowling or Baseball or the final 11 puzzle race? |
|||
SirCrocodilep |
|||
|
Eliza...
Ignore them... just wait for next season. People will eventually come to the conclusion that Russell is truly one of the best players out there. Opinions always change down the roads. That is the cycle itself. |
|||
XtremeInnovator420 |
|||
|
Yeah.....all this venom going around and having the people who are satisfied with the winner act more defensive than the person who's not satisfied and
that I don't even agree with just makes me say "screw it, I'm staying the hell out of this".
|
|||
JPOz |
|||
|
It's Survivor Jihad/The Holy War: Prayer Warrior Nation vs Egomaniacal Satanists. No wonder why it stirs up such passion.
|
|||
WylDawg |
|||
|
Sad thing is, that I think I'm the one who got the ball rolling for this. I thought there would be just a couple of civilized arguments.
My bad, sorry for destroying your Sucks career, Eliza? |
|||
pushingjate |
|||
|
I'm not trying to be a dick, I was just curious as to why she called the jury bitter. But since she refuses to answer the question, I'll just accept
she knows she's a hypocrite regarding that issue.
|
|||
CoconutPhone |
|||
|
Jeff also called the Jury bitter.
Just sayin'. |
|||
CSCin3D |
|||
|
Eliza asskissers are the lowest form of life on the planet next to Eliza herself
And lol at these stupid fucks using what Jeff thinks as backup |
|||
Maximus20 |
|||
CoconutPhone wrote:Jeff loved Coach..... Don't get me wrong. I usually think Jeff is on the ball. But ummm.. This time I personally don't agree. The jury voted for Natalie. Natalie is the best player. Done and Done. |
|||
pushingjate |
|||
CoconutPhone wrote:But Jeff didnt yell at Twila and call her names and later demand an apology from her, before casting a vote for Chris cause she "liked him better" |
|||
WylDawg |
|||
|
No worries, the contreversy will die down once the new season begins.
....who am I kidding? We're all going to be over it by next week. |
|||
Shred |
|||
|
I love when the jury is bitter <3
Seriously if the jury is bitter at you you did something wrong, you clearly did not play the best if EVERYONE hates you and does not wanna give you there vote. My opinion, should have played a better social game. Sorry, can never defend Russell. This game is multi layered and a lot of factors come into it. It all depends on what season but if you cannot adapt to the jury that sits in front of you then you don't deserve the million. Survivor is all about adapting. |
|||
JPOz |
|||
WylDawg wrote: Actually, in it's own way, it's a good thing you did it. Not if it means Eliza leaves forever but it proves the point about Russhole. If you go to far over a line people will say no thank you and walk away with no guilt. And it's their right to do it. Doesn't make them bitter. But, unfortunately, it could happen. She pretty much said "Stop" in her last post....but some just keep going. It's not your fault. It's their's. When someone says Stop they mean stop. When someone says no they mean no. When someone says "chill out"...take the giant chill pill and chill out. |
|||
craig |
|||
Eliza asskissers are the lowest form of life on the planet next to Eliza herself No, the lowest form of message board life, are those who hate on others just because they have different favourites or opinions. Besides, shouldn't Natalie fans be nice? You're acting like you should be Russell fans. :)
Last Edited By: craig
12/22/09 11:28 AM.
Edited 2 times.
|
|||
XtremeInnovator420 |
|||
|
...I'm a Natalie fan, glad she won, and am trying to act as impartial as at all possible in this whole thing, does that count?
|
|||
OrsNaz |
|||
CSCin3D wrote: Lol, nobody is ass kissing. I think Russell was the best player of the season and I believe the jury was bitter however I love Nat and I am happy she won. Its perfectly okay to disagree with Eliza and argue your points but there is no reason to swarm her with the same shit over and over again and insult her. It's just not cool.
Last Edited By: OrsNaz
12/22/09 11:41 AM.
Edited 2 times.
|
|||
JPOz |
|||
XtremeInnovator420 wrote:Yes, it does count. Thank you. Personally, I'm a SURVIVOR fan. I'm very glad Natalie won. I'm very sorry for Russell that he lost, in many ways he deserved the win. On the other side of the ledger, both have quite a few entries for why they didn't deserve to win. Eliza and Probst have publicly stated their opinion of the matter. I completely disagree with them. It would have been nice to discuss it with her in this forum. But personally, if I was her and this was the response I got, I wouldn't bother. Ain't no way anyone is going to get her or Probst to rethink their opinion with the approach that's been used here. |
|||
burnettfollower |
|||
TRAINROBBER wrote: If that's the case, they could have also easily voted for Mick to win. And the fact that she coat tailled Russell should have made her less of a player in the jury's eyes. Being nice and polite to everyone, and even going so far as to be bible thumping with them does not make a person the best player. It makes easier to get along with them as opposed to putting put with an arrogant, obnioxious douchbeag who threatens you, but not necassarily a better player. As for Mick not getting the win or any votes based on how poorly he led his team or being a poor leader overall, is another bullshit excuse to not give him
the votes. He made a crucial alliance, claims the decisions amongst the FF's were a consensus and everyone was consulted, and even contemplated switching
alliances and blindsiding Russell should have made him a better player than what he's given credit for. Because he was compared to big Russell by the Galus
does not make for a good analysis, imho, just crappy comparisons. Mick's plan as stated in the recrap was to lead by consensus, stay low, and not put a
target on his back for being a physical threat, and that he succeeded as a strategy.
|
|||