The REAL winner of Somoa in Survivor Sucks Forum

0 Points

The REAL winner of Somoa

Started By	Comment
JaimeCat22		#81	[-]
Posts: 502 (12/21/09 09:52 PM) Reply Quote More Recent Posts	Anyone who says 'Easy as taking candy from a baby' has obviously never tried it. Remove this ad nevermind
ImANewUser		#82	[-]
Posts: 1868 (12/21/09 10:19 PM) Registered User Reply Quote More Recent Posts	JaimeCat22 wrote: It's like I said in the other thread - in seasons with a satisfying outcome, they don't need to write pages and pages of articles justifying the outcome. None of this outrage happened in Brian Heidik's season or Todd's season. And for good reason. Case closed. Natalie sucks but she won. Shitty ending to a shitty season. Let's move on to S20. Wasn't this because of Amanda completely FAIL-ing at the Final TC? And as I recall, wasn't there STILL a reasonable amount of outrage? And I completely skipped the finale, so I just lurked on the forums. :P
MonkeeSpanker		#83	[-]
Posts: 1193 (12/21/09 10:30 PM) Reply Quote More Recent Posts	SkyDreamer wrote: God, all of the Russell supporters are sore losers. He lost, get over it already. Bullshit, I think Russell is a sack of shit, but he deserved to win. Too many homos are going on and on about a social game, fuck that. Russhole did everything in his power to win, what exactly did Natalie do that was so great or compelling? She did nothing to earn this win, Mick did the same thing as her, why didn't he get any votes?
seltzer3		#84	[-]
Posts: 1590 (12/21/09 10:31 PM) Registered User Reply Quote More Recent Posts	Mick had an awful social game compared to Natalie. Every person that got booted, said that he never really talked to anyone.
ThrowMeGabon		#85	[-]
Posts: 1304 (12/21/09 10:35 PM) Reply Quote More Recent Posts	MonkeeSpanker wrote: SkyDreamer wrote: God, all of the Russell supporters are sore losers. He lost, get over it already. Bullshit, I think Russell is a sack of shit, but he deserved to win. Too many homos are going on and on about a social game, fuck that. Russhole did everything in his power to win, what exactly did Natalie do that was so great or compelling? She did nothing to earn this win, Mick did the same thing as her, why didn't he get any votes? X. I'm forced to defend Russell only because people are irrationally defending Natalie. It's not that I'm butthurt for Russell, he just deserved to win over those two. It's not a high bar.
Greenkiwi		#86	[-]
Posts: 3 (12/21/09 10:51 PM) Reply Quote More Recent Posts	MonkeeSpanker wrote: SkyDreamer wrote: God, all of the Russell supporters are sore losers. He lost, get over it already. Bullshit, I think Russell is a sack of shit, but he deserved to win. Too many homos are going on and on about a social game, fuck that. Russhole did everything in his power to win, what exactly did Natalie do that was so great or compelling? She did nothing to earn this win, Mick did the same thing as her, why didn't he get any votes? If you "fuck" the social game then it isn't Survivor, it's American Idol. Survivor is based around social interactions and relationships. It takes two things to win this game. A good strategy, and a good social game. Russ could strategies, but when it came to the social aspect he completely failed. Natalie, on the other hand hit a solid strategy and mixed it with an excellent social game. Nat has 2/2, Russ has 1/2. It's basically the same thing as Poopert, yet the entire opposite. Poopert was good at getting along with people, the social aspect. However, he's probably the biggest fail at a strategist the show has ever seen. Russ is the exact opposite, sporting a good strategy but with no social aspects to back him up. Mick didn't get any votes because Mick really didn't do anything. Natalie made moves, and more importantly, Natalie knew the jury hated Russ and she stroked his ego all the way to the bank. Personally, I think Nat munipulated Russell more than Russell munipulated anyone in the entire game.
Avatar		#87	[-]
Posts: 2 (12/21/09 11:53 PM) Reply Quote More Recent Posts	If Russell would have dropped the figurine, we wouldn't be having these discussions...
Brightside Sucks		#88	[-]
Posts: 782 (12/22/09 12:34 AM) Registered user Reply Quote More Recent Posts	Watching the delusional Russell fans grasping at straws is highly entertaining. Thanks for the laughter. I hate how the most arrogant, entitled player on the show was the narrator. I guarantee that if airtime was distributed equally, we would all see how much game was being played by EVERYONE. From the very VERY little of Natalie and Jaison's game, I could tell that they were playing well. Especially when Jaison informed Russell that Shambo is leaving. Russell can huff and puff to the confessional camera's all he wants. It's all just fluff to me.
bryanpasa		#89	[-]
Posts: 2974 (12/22/09 12:38 AM) Reply Quote More Recent Posts	Avatar wrote: If Russell would have dropped the figurine, we wouldn't be having these discussions... He cheated and there are screencaps of it.....Brett wins Samoa actually
ImCrushingYourHead		#90	[-]
Posts: 5390 (12/22/09 12:43 AM) Registered user Reply Quote More Recent Posts	Anyone who says 'Easy as taking candy from a baby' has obviously never tried it. Remove this ad Do tell!
underYa		#91	[-]
Posts: 1235 (12/22/09 12:53 AM) Registered User Reply Quote More Recent Posts	ThrowMeGabon wrote: MonkeeSpanker wrote: SkyDreamer wrote: God, all of the Russell supporters are sore losers. He lost, get over it already. Bullshit, I think Russell is a sack of shit, but he deserved to win. Too many homos are going on and on about a social game, fuck that. Russhole did everything in his power to win, what exactly did Natalie do that was so great or compelling? She did nothing to earn this win, Mick did the same thing as her, why didn't he get any votes? X. I'm forced to defend Russell only because people are irrationally defending Natalie. It's not that I'm butthurt for Russell, he just deserved to win over those two. It's not a high bar. Lmao, this isn't about Natalie or Mick. It's about Russel being a little baby. Had he had some class, maybe I'd support him now.. but no way in hell now. He deserved to lose, cause it's obvious he has no understanding of the game or the world in general. Arrogant little prick.
losemygrip		#92	[-]
Posts: 166 (12/22/09 01:13 AM) Registered User Reply Quote More Recent Posts	YemaGrl1988 wrote: Could Richard have won without the Tagi 4? Could Tina have won without Colby? Could Ethan have won without Lex? Could Vecepia have won without NuMaraamu? Could Brian have won without Clay? Could Jenna have won without Rob? Could Sandra have won without Lil? Could Amber have won without Rob? Could Chris have won without Twila? Could Tom have won without Ian? Could Danni have won without Rafe? Could Aras have won without Cirie? Could Yul have won without Ozzy? Could Earl have won without Cassandra? Could Todd have won without Amanda? Could Parvati have won without Amanda? Could Bob have won without Sugar? Could JT have won without Stephen? I mean, I understand you're upset but I'm pretty sure every winner relied on someone helping them win the game. The reason that Russell lost was because the jury didn't want him to win. The jury is there to vote for the winner. The rules don't state why they have to vote the way they vote. They don't have to vote for "most conniving" they can vote for any of the finalist. What you think is deserving and what others think is deserving is totally different. The jury probably knows what REALLY went on in the game better than you did. After all, viewers only received a manipulated edit of what went on in the game. Saying that Natalie didn't deserve to win doesn't make Russell more deserving. Say that Natalie wasn't strategic doesn't make Russell more strategic. If you think Russell deserved to win because he was true to himself, didn't Russell say he acts opposite in real life than he does in the game? Is that being true to himself? Isn't being true to themselves acting the way you would in real life to the situations in the game? Didn't Natalie do that? So by your logic: Natalie is the real winner of Samoa. Thank you Yema. The game isn't just about being entertaining and steamrolling to the end. It's about getting the jury to vote for you. If you don't do that, you're not a good player. Russell didn't do that, and Natalie did. And since this is Sucks, learn to spell Samoa, people. When I saw the title of this thread, I first thought it said "The REAL winner of Somosa" which I think is that big flat Indian bread. Now, THERE'S a prize worthy of 39 days starving in the jungle. A nice piece of somosa.
crisdizzle		#93	[-]
Posts: 68 (12/22/09 01:28 AM) Reply Quote More Recent Posts	The real "Soul Survivor" and it ain't Natalie or Russell!
georgiaknight33		#94	[-]
Posts: 273 (12/22/09 02:38 AM) Registered user Reply Quote More Recent Posts	Some points that must be made: -Playing the most abrasive and outlandish game does not mean you are playing the most strategic. -Just because people nod their heads in agreement doesn't mean they believe all of the bullshit you're saying. -Natalie knew Russell was a goat, therefore did not stop him. -If being mean was his 'strategy', someone please tell me how being degrading toward women in his confessionals helps him get to the Final 3. That is all.
jensamember36		#95	[-]
Posts: 6482 (12/22/09 02:44 AM) Reply Quote More Recent Posts	manimal wrote: It is my humble opinion that THAT'S were you lost me NO ONE GIVES A FUCK!
Cassidy666		#96	[-]
Posts: 10670 (12/22/09 02:47 AM) Registered User Reply Quote More Recent Posts	Didn't the real winner win? confused
Sshaaz		#97	[-]
Posts: 565 (12/22/09 02:51 AM) Reply Quote More Recent Posts	"-Playing the most abrasive and outlandish game does not mean you are playing the most strategic. " but everyone following you like sheep and agreeing with every move you make doesn't? "-Just because people nod their heads in agreement doesn't mean they believe all of the bullshit you're saying. " and doing the opposite gets you sent home. Tell Marisa I said 'Hi.' "-Natalie knew Russell was a goat, therefore did not stop him. " She couldn't if she wanted to...there werent a lot of coattails to jump onto had she tried... "-If being mean was his 'strategy', someone please tell me how being degrading toward women in his confessionals helps him get to the Final 3. " What do his confessionals have to do with anything? The have no bearing on any placement on the game whatsoever. Its a moot point. If Russell's strategy was to 'be mean' then why was he trusted by so many people? Hell, even Brett came close to trusting him at the end. Erik wasn't booted because Russell was mean, Erik was booted because Erik probably couldn't have played a worse game. Kelly wasn't booted because Russell was mean, she was booted because Galu were idiots. Laura wasn't booted because Russell was mean, Laura was booted because she was hated by a key player in the game at that point. Dave was saved by Russell, was that Russell being mean? Monica got exactly what she deserved after running her mouth. THAT is all...
Tigernanama		#98	[-]
Posts: 1569 (12/22/09 01:08 PM) Registered user Reply Quote More Recent Posts	It doesn't matter in the slightest, but 1500+ posts actually still makes me a bit of a noob. And you...well, you guessed it.
SuperJude		#99	[-]
Posts: 16260 (12/23/09 08:56 AM) Registered user Reply Quote More Recent Posts	Anyone who says 'Easy as taking candy from a baby' has obviously never tried it. Remove this ad This really needs to get bumped. The REAL winner of Somoa is nobody since Somoa doesn't exist but if we're talking Survivor: Samoa, then Natalie and Sucks are the REAL winners! -SJ™

<< Previous Topic Next Topic >>

Yuku free message boards

The REAL winner of Somoa