
| Started By | Comment | ||
|---|---|---|---|
Sshaaz |
|||
|
I've never actually hoped someone's kid would die of cancer. First time for everything, I suppose...
|
|||
ThrowMeGabon |
|||
|
Y, but Bob (and Susie) have grown on me over time. It was a clusterfuck random season, and I guess it deserved a clusterfuck random winner.
|
|||
Greenkiwi |
|||
|
Are you wishing death upon my kid because Russell lost Survivor Samoa?
|
|||
novaya |
|||
Sshaaz wrote: lolwut? |
|||
Sshaaz |
|||
|
Nope, I guess it's more that your hatred of a human being has been converted into total skepticism of something that is greater than a stupid game. You are
saying, in a nutshell, "If there's any good that St. Jude's could do to help a single child, I refuse to be a part of it because I hate
Russell." In a way, I feel sorry for you, but in some ways, I don't.
|
|||
Greenkiwi |
|||
novaya wrote:I believe the translation is: Anyone who like Russel's loss will have their kid receive cancer due to the fact that we don't see what a quiet, gentle, and totally not sore loser Russell is. |
|||
Sshaaz |
|||
|
See the translation above
|
|||
Greenkiwi |
|||
Sshaaz wrote:What are you talking about. I said that winning the sprint choice award does nothing to prove that you're a good player. Aha, I don't hate Russell at all, I just think Natalie played a better game. I think it's great that Russell donated money to cancer, but that doesn't mean I think he should have won the game. |
|||
novaya |
|||
|
No, I'm saying Russell's gameplay is as good as Sugar's (if not worse than it). And anyone saying Sugar is a famewhore is a flagrant retard because
Russell is more of one.
I could also create a web site saying "WOW I'M SO FUCKING AWESOME AND EVERYONE ELSE FUCKING SUCKS" with the caveat that "if u agree, I'll donate to a charity ^_^." If Russell really gave a fuck about dying children or w/e he would have been more noble and truly philanthropic like "Help everyday kids become the SOLE SURVIVORS!" and not "Russellgotscrewed.com, ps, donate to my glories and St. Jude's gets a cut." FOAD hypocrite. Sugar would never have done this shit. Russell is the worst loser ever. |
|||
ThrowMeGabon |
|||
|
Just playing devil's advocate, would you rather have a sore loser who cared intensely about the game, or a graceful loser who never gave two shits about
the game?
|
|||
Greenkiwi |
|||
ThrowMeGabon wrote: Meh, it really doesn't matter to me. |
|||
ThrowMeGabon |
|||
|
Well that answers a lot of questions for me, greenwiki :-)
|
|||
novaya |
|||
|
Graceful loser who created a fun season of epic ups and downs (Gabon) over a camerahog sore loser who dovetailed that bullshit into shitting over the winner
and peddling chintzy merchandise vis-a-vis a self-aggrandizing web site like [survivorname]gotscrewed.com any. day. of. the. week.
Any love for Russell's in-game gameplay should be flushed down the toilet due to his bitter obvi famewhoring. And again, this is why Russell played like Sugar yet is still worse than her at the end of the day. |
|||
Sshaaz |
|||
|
Fact is, America votes for the player of the season. That is putting everyone who votes on the jury. Russell wins in a landslide. Deny that, I dare you...
Therefore, America believes Russell got screwed. You may not, which is great. Don't buy a shirt, nobody gives a shit. But don't sit here and think that
the results of Russell losing this game pale in comparison to Sugar's. "Sugar would never have done this shit." That sentence speaks VOLUMES
toward character. Everything else you've uttered speaks towards yours, as well.
|
|||
novaya |
|||
Sshaaz wrote:TY James Clement, winner of Survivor: China AND Survivor: Fans v. Favorites. I bet Monica could have won Fan Fave were she edited as aggressively as Russell. Sugar was also a fan favo of Gabon and is back for S20 too, just like Russhole. Try again. |
|||
SPunKeeMonKee |
|||
|
The problem with Sugar & her antics was that we ended up with boring-ass Bob winning. He didn't do anything strategic & was dragged the whole way
through, even his own alliance mates said he never contributed to the strategy sessions & just did random shit at camp (Marcunt mentioned this in an
interview). What's even more disgusting was the reason he was taken to the end, because he was supposedly a "good person" according to Sugar
& her twisted, hypocritical logic. Seeing him win was not satisfying, having Russell lose caused a meltdown of epic proportions.. and we're only one
day into it.
Russell's game was easier to swallow compared to Sugar's "omg I will help America's favourite get to the end so I can become popular & further my acting career" strategy. At least he was trying to win, even though he was delusional about the jury votes. Ugh, they're both horrid in completely different ways. |
|||
Sshaaz |
|||
|
Do you honestly think that any person who takes the time to sit there and pick up their phone to place a vote for "Player of the Season" doesn't
vote for the person they think deserves to win the game? Are you *that* ignorant? Come on, please... Monica could have won, sure...had she PLAYED aggressively
as Russell.
|
|||
Jeffieboi |
|||
|
Sugar controlled every vote she was there for. That was including the winner. She wanted Bob to win, and she made sure that happened. Russell didn't get
his way, and then cried like the little bitch that he is. Sugar controlled her season WAY more than Russell controlled his. Russell, Natalie, Jaison, and Mick
all had the same goal, but somehow Russell was the only one who got his way? Hell no! All four of them had equal control, and in the end Natalie was the one
who got her way. Sugar may not have won, but in the end she still got her way.
Sugar >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Russell H. |
|||
Sshaaz |
|||
|
I suppose Nat and Mick held that figurine up long enough for Brett to lose. So ignorant...
|
|||
bryanpasa |
|||
|
Natalie won! You can't change it! File a lawsuit if you want! and f*ck with CBS.
Brett won! due to rigging of the final challenge....Russhole couldn't even be there since he'll be targetted by Brett & Friends. |
|||