I have been watching survivor from the beginning, I just dont live my life on the trons like some of you do LOL!!

| Started By | Comment | ||
|---|---|---|---|
schoolsgirl |
|||
|
direct your hate and assholery to someone who actually cares
I have been watching survivor from the beginning, I just dont live my life on the trons like some of you do LOL!! |
|||
Wild Animal Kingdom |
|||
|
This guy is just a mental case! he should also go down in history as the most bitter survivor looser in history. He makes Sue Hawk look like an angel.
And he says titles are important to him. Well, I've got one for him. Miserable Whiney Fat Fu**! |
|||
bryanpasa |
|||
|
LOL @ Russell being so bitter
~~ I just realized one thing. Marisa for Second Chance edition! She'll probably win! =P |
|||
SilvahYoshum |
|||
Miles Edgeworth wrote: so russell should get credit for telling natalie "hey, go make those people like us" rather than natalie for actually doing it? |
|||
underYa |
|||
|
Cry baby cry.
|
|||
Miles Edgeworth |
|||
SPunKeeMonKee wrote: So Russel pissed off two jurors and now he sucks at the social game? Lets not kid ourselves here, Natalie did very little in the game and was rewarded for getting piggybacked to the end and having a vagina. The only only thing the mick jaison and nat trio did other than the erik boot was not boot russel and that was his doing not theirs. |
|||
novaya |
|||
Miles Edgeworth wrote: Sugar was a better player than Russell. FACT. |
|||
Miles Edgeworth |
|||
novaya wrote: K fixed that incorrect statement of yours. Though I have no doubts that if she made the finals on this season her vagina would have gotten her the win. |
|||
novaya |
|||
|
Read the Russel H. = Sugar thread and be illuminated. <3
|
|||
Sshaaz |
|||
|
|
|||
swim4life227 |
|||
LOLABINGO wrote:Nah he hates Brett too, he would have been just as bitter if Brett beat him too. He's only congratulating Brett and saying he deserved it because he didn't win or beat him. Earlier in the episode he said Brett hasn't done anything and doesn't deserve it because he only started playing the game on day 35 or w/e |
|||
cid |
|||
|
Posts: 90 (12/22/09 03:50 AM) |
Last Edited By: cid
01/07/10 03:11 PM.
Edited 2 times.
|
||
xoDC3xo |
|||
Miles Edgeworth wrote:Natalie didn't need to make big moves. She aligned with Russell who actively protected her and promised to take her to the final three. He was a slimy douchebag and everyone liked her. What do people suggest she do? Make unnecessary moves? Bullshit. She didn't need to... THAT'S THE POINT! He actively protected her. Her hands were clean even though she was right along with Russell in voting out everyone. He made an alliegence to her and she exploited it. Did she need to do much? No. But obviously it was the right thing to do and she did it why is she being faulted for that? |
|||
Yeaster |
|||
Miles Edgeworth wrote: At least the moves Sugar made actually benefited her (up until she self-destructed during the endgame, but even then she had enough sense to know there was no way in hell she was going to win). Russell did more than Natalie but a lot of the moves he made were simply unnecessary, and did nothing to help him. Natalie knew she didn't have to do a whole lot and so she didn't, choosing to only act when she needed to thus landing the win. |
|||
pjadedd |
|||
|
More than being a complete sore loser, the thing that bothers me most about Russell's interviews are when he says he wouldn't have done anything
differently. That shows how unflexible he was as a player. His strategy was to play hard as this character, everyone else be damned. I'm not attributing
his game to luck, but it worked out for him. The moves he made worked when they needed to and he was playing with a bunch of people who sucked at the game. He
seemed, though, until the bitter end to not want to even think for a second that there was something else he could do.
This is just my opinion, but when there are jury members telling other finalists "give me a reason to vote for you so I don't have to vote for Russell," there is a huge flaw in your game. Don't get me wrong, I completely understand that there are bitter people on the jury, but I can't attribute Natalie getting 7 votes to people being bitter simply that they lost. People have played big and won. People have been jerks and won. Others have pointed out Rich and Brian. Kelly was unliked by some and Clay was not a good alternative vs. Brian. It's key to have people around you that others don't like to, especially if you're going to play like Russell. I also think the social aspect goes beyond making friends and being liked. Other than the scene where he said he would want his daughters to date someone like Brett, we didn't see much in terms of sincerity from Russell (not saying it wasn't there; we just didn't see it). It seems that Russell, especially when interacting with Galu, was all game. Building relationships is important for the jury, and not just to say "I know about you and your family, etc, etc." Look at Russell's answer to Laura's question. He said that he needed to get rid of her or she'd be sitting up there. That's your typical jury answer. Most of the jury won't buy it, though, because they'll just think it's Russell trying to be sincere when he's not. Finalists have given bullshit answers before, but because of relationships formed or knowing how to say things to certain people, it worked. Look at China. Do you think Todd really believed his biggest move was getting out Jean-Robert? He said that because that's what JR wanted to hear. And because they had a relationship, JR believed him (or at least voted for him, I believe). Russell doesn't get that you can play the game the same way 5 times and have 5 different results. People can be pissed about losing, but still respect your game. |
|||
micronesia |
|||
|
To all people who think Nat was a major factor in voting out Erik: Show me any evidence (except for her saying: "Hey girls, I dont trust Erik")...
If she`d be the social mastermind of anything, we`d have heard of it in detail by now. Yet there is no footage, no interview, NOTHING (!) giving us any insight into how she supposedly did it. It didnt happen, people... Russ sent her over to stir things up, she said "Erik is not trustworthy, lulz, lets vote him out, I`m sweet, kthxbye". That`s it. |
|||
Miles Edgeworth |
|||
Yeaster wrote: All of his moves were necessary cuz he was playing for the whole team while the others just sat back campaigning so yea they were beneficial. And the brett alliance was necessary to try and stop the other three from teaming up on him just in case he lost immunity. the whole she didnt do alot but should win defense is bullshit. If thats the case Mick should have won this game hands down 9-0. His hannds were squeaky clean and he voted the same way evo else did. But I guarantee you everybody would call me out for stating such drivel. the same applies to natalie, she didnt win the game, russel lost it when a bitter jury gave the game to someone else. This had nothing to do with social ties or anything it was a preplanned group anal raping and would have happened even if russel was peaches with everybody |
|||
BortBort |
|||
|
If you are going to let the editing tell you that Russell controlled the game from start to finish and was the best player ever then you have to be willing to
opne wide and swallow when the editing tells you that Nat engineered the Erik boot. Cos the editing did tell us that Nat engineered Erik's boot, whether or
not it is actually true is another story.
|
|||
token lunatic |
|||
|
I don't know who will be reviled more in Alumni's minds: Lil, Mariano, or Russell.
|
|||
Miles Edgeworth |
|||
|
Ive actually conceded that fact. It still only counts as 1 move in 39 days. what the fuck was she doing for the other 38?
|
|||