Sshaaz wrote:LOL WUT?
Take a close look at what you are saying... noone rooted for Sugar to win, yet millions rooted for Russell to win. How exactly does that happen? If they played the same game, then what qualifies Sugar as being better than Russell? You keep using the word "same" over and over. Something had to be different. Was it a bitter jury versus an objective one? No, we agree they were both bitter. Was it that Sugar *actually* deserved to win? Can we agree that she absolutely did not? So what is it? Maybe its the fact that Russell *actually* did deserve it. Maybe that's the difference in the scenarios. I can honestly say that Bob *didn't* deserve to win, so by your comparison, Natalie deserved it 20 times LESS. Fact.
Sugar was the obvi fan fave and America was like =O when Bob cinched it over her. Granted the Sucksdom lold since she went from EPIC to FAIL for her treacherous anti-Crystal ways, but Sugar was a fan favo. More, Sugar was in a season where EVERYONE aside from Jacquie got a great edit as opposed to Russell who was pimped from pre-game to end-game -- so much so that they couldn't even give a FULL SURVIVOR INTRO IN EP 1 (with Marisa) BECAUSE THEY WERE *SO STRETCHED FOR TIME TO FIT ALL OF HIS BEAUTY INTO OUR TV SCREENS*. lol.
Sugar earned every accolade she got, including runner up in the fan vote and her F3 status. Russhole lost in an epic Jury blowout and got the most hoggish edit ever for a season. Give. me. a. break.
Sugar is still >>>> Russell.











