
| Started By | Comment | ||
|---|---|---|---|
Yukon789 |
What if there were a tie after the jury votes? |
Lead | |
|
What does Survivor do if there is a tie with jury votes? They knew they were exposing themselves to the possibility of this when they went to the three
contestants in the final format. Russell 4, Natalie 4, Mick 1. What would they have done?
|
|||
QuizGuy66 |
|||
|
EPMB would soil himself with glee.
-QG |
|||
burberrylad |
|||
|
Would have made whoever voted for Mick decide.
If it was a 3-3-3 tie then I think the Final 3 would vote. For example, Natalie votes for Russ, Russ votes for Natalie thus Micks vote would decide. |
|||
Axie.rsfd |
|||
Yukon789 wrote:PURPLE ROCK |
|||
burnettfollower |
|||
|
Wasn't this discussed before?
There is no clear cut answer. Unless and until such a thing does happen we will probably never know. |
|||
Double Edged Sword |
|||
|
|
|||
JPOz |
|||
Double Edged Sword wrote:^because Probst clearly favored Russell; he'd tell Mick he was boring and Natalie he liked her underwear but he loves Russell and Russell deserved it a lot more than either one of them. |
|||
sammyhain2364 |
|||
|
If there's a tie all 20 contestants would have to go back to Samoa and play the game again
|
|||
Axie.rsfd |
|||
sammyhain2364 wrote:the saddest thing about this is that Galu probably would be Pagong'd again |
|||
Greenkiwi |
|||
sammyhain2364 wrote: Would we have to watch it again? (Please say no.) |
|||
Wolf Myth |
|||
|
Dave Ball decides the winner cuz he has the highest IQ and knows better than any of us.
|
|||