| Started By | Comment | ||
|---|---|---|---|
 damnredsox |
When Russell asked Natalie, to choose between Jaison and Mick...... |
Lead | |
|
Posts: 58 (12/23/09 12:01 AM) |
Her reason she gave Russell for voting out Mick was this and i quote "Voting off Mick would insure he would be gone tonight and then tomorrow if we win
immunity its just me, you and Jaison and we have a better chance"
Huh? this is the person who won the game? |
||
|
Sshaaz |
|||
|
Posts: 627 (12/23/09 12:03 AM) |
Richard Hatch 2.0
|
||
|
Shred |
|||
|
Posts: 871 (12/23/09 12:04 AM) |
Easy
If they vote off Mick, if Brett loses, Brett is gone and they have a better chance of beating Jaison then Mick. Easy to get. |
||
|
RickyJ1 |
|||
|
Posts: 261 (12/23/09 12:08 AM) Registered user |
damnredsox wrote:What do you expect from a pharmaceutical rep? They are legal drug dealers, just some tits and ass to get the doctors to prescribe their drugs. |
||
|
pinkbug8u |
|||
|
Posts: 168 (12/23/09 12:43 AM) Registered User |
I got what she said just fine. what's hard to understand about that? They think Mick is a bigger jury threat and voting him off will ensure he
doesn't get to the jury.
|
||
|
NickF227 |
|||
|
Posts: 13061 (12/23/09 12:47 AM) |
Are the Russell lovers seriously just finding random shit to hate on now?
|
||
|
Sshaaz |
|||
|
Posts: 631 (12/23/09 12:51 AM) |
"Voting off Mick would ensure he would be gone tonight."
Are you *sure* Natalie? That's a bold statement... I mean *ensure* is a pretty definitive term. There's no wavering, so make sure you are saying what you mean... I completely understand the Natalie love now. |
||
|
Sshaaz |
|||
|
Posts: 632 (12/23/09 12:55 AM) |
"They think Mick is a bigger jury threat and voting him off will ensure he doesn't get to the jury."
I rest my case. |
||
|
SuperJude |
|||
|
Posts: 16186 (12/23/09 12:55 AM) Registered user |
damnredsox wrote: this from a red sox fan? 
-SJ™ |
||
|
pinkbug8u |
|||
|
Posts: 169 (12/23/09 01:01 AM) Registered User |
I rest my case. I don't for the life of me even understand your case. |
||
|
Sshaaz |
|||
|
Posts: 633 (12/23/09 01:10 AM) |
Jury Exhibit A: "Voting off Mick would insure he would be gone tonight" Thank you Captain Obvious.
Jury Exhibit B: "They think Mick is a bigger jury threat and voting him off will ensure he doesn't get to the jury." Voting Mick OFF ensures he DOESNT get to the jury. Your honor, Natalie isn't overly "bright" as it were, but she's pretty adorable. Natalie fans love this and proclaim it worthy of the title of Sole Survivor. But ladies and gentlemen of the jury, could it be said that the reason Natalie has fans are because they are as fucking retarded as she seems to be? Let the evidence show: Guilty as charged. Again, I rest my case. |
||
|
RickyJ1 |
|||
|
Posts: 264 (12/23/09 01:12 AM) Registered user |
Sshaaz wrote: With brain power like that I can see why Russell wanted to take her to the final. |
||
|
pinkbug8u |
|||
|
Posts: 170 (12/23/09 01:13 AM) Registered User |
yeah you're still not making sense.
|
||
|
Sshaaz |
|||
|
Posts: 634 (12/23/09 01:14 AM) |
How's the weather in Arkansas, pinkbug?
|
||
|
pinkbug8u |
|||
|
Posts: 171 (12/23/09 01:16 AM) Registered User |
i wouldn't know. how's the weather in crazy?
|
||
|
pinkbug8u |
|||
|
Posts: 172 (12/23/09 01:18 AM) Registered User |
voting Mick off will ensure he doesn't get a chance to stand in front of a jury. does that make more sense to you now? seriously grasping at straws.
|
||
|
Sshaaz |
|||
|
Posts: 635 (12/23/09 01:19 AM) |
do you still not see?
|
||
|
Venatrix Avia |
|||
|
Posts: 128 (12/23/09 01:19 AM) |
The stray comma in the subject line makes my eyes bleed. Good thing it's ironic, right, in a post about someone being kinda dumb?
Oh wait |
||
|
xoDC3xo |
|||
|
Posts: 166 (12/23/09 01:21 AM) |
Sshaaz wrote:The adorable idiot you speak of knew that the fat, sexist, troll would never see her as a threat. Russell got beat by an IDIOT! GEE, how embarrassing! Russell got outwitted by someone not that bright. You guys do realize you're not really helping Russell's case here? |
||
|
seltzer3 |
|||
|
Posts: 1596 (12/23/09 01:23 AM) Registered User |
This isn't that hard. Natalie believed that Mick was more of a jury threat than Jaison. That whole dialogue was pretty much debating keeping a weaker F3
opponent (Jaison), or keeping a guy that has a better chance taking out Brett (Mick). Its not that hard to understand.
|
||
|
Sshaaz |
|||
|
Posts: 636 (12/23/09 01:23 AM) |
See, when you put it that way, it actually makes sense...not MORE sense, but sense. Now, look at what Nat says and tell me what she really meant by
"Voting Mick off would ensure that he'd be gone tonight"
|
||
Message board courtesy of Survivor Sucks member support.
Benevolent dictatorship courtesy of Survivor Sucks Admin Idoits.
